GEO audit of a service company site — AI readiness 22/100
An anonymised report of a real site — service company site. The address, the company name and any identifying quotes are hidden.
This audit in brief
An audit of a service company site. The score is 22 out of 100; about 30 pages were read and 97% of the criteria evaluated.
The strongest area is “Trust Signals” — 49 out of 100.
The three weakest areas: FAQ Quality — 0/100, Schema.org / JSON-LD — 0/100, Entity Clarity — 15/100.
“FAQ Quality” is only partly prepared: some criteria pass, others do not.
The report at a glance
Strengths
- Trust Signals49/100
- Service Structure42/100
- Answer Readiness34/100
Main problems
- FAQ Quality0/100
- Schema.org / JSON-LD0/100
- Entity Clarity15/100
- AI Summary Readiness24/100
- Proof Layer26/100
Anonymised example report: services site. Addresses, names and quotes are hidden.
~30 pages
criteria evaluated: 97%
criteria 3.3.0 · engine 1.28.0
Доступность для AI
—10 checked · 10 passed · 0 issues
Главная страница возвращает HTTP 200
Финальный URL использует HTTPS
robots.txt присутствует
- HTTP status: ≈200
XML sitemap присутствует
- URLs indexed: ≈1710
OAI-SearchBot разрешён
Политика для GPTBot ясна
Googlebot разрешён
YandexBot разрешён
Нет глобального Disallow: /
- Global block: None
HTML-контент доступен
Понятность компании как сущности
159 checked · 3 passed · 4 issues
Issue: Brand name is unclear
Fix: Add a clear, consistent company or brand name to your Organization/WebSite JSON-LD, Open Graph tags, and main pages.
- Detected name: none
Видимость юридического лица
- Identifier value: ******0509
Issue: Business category is unclear
Fix: State your business category consistently in Organization/Service/Product JSON-LD, the homepage title, and your company summary.
- Category candidate: none
Чёткое описание «что мы делаем»
- Character count: ≈400
- Subject signal: yes
- Activity signal: yes
- Structured corroboration: yes
География оказания услуг
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Issue: Target audience is unclear
Fix: Add a dedicated \"Who it's for\" section and explicitly list the types of customers, companies, or users the offering fits.
- Audience source: none
Partial: About page says too little
Fix: Expand your About page with more substance (at least a few short paragraphs) and add supporting details — company name, description, legal info, team, history/mission, and a contact link.
- Text length: ≈4260
- Supporting signals count: 2
Полнота страницы контактов
- Contact form: yes
- Channels count: 4
Внешние профили sameAs
- Reason: No Organization/LocalBusiness/Person entity or reliable company name found
- sameAs count: 0
Согласованность сущности на страницах
- Reason: Fewer than two independent strong name sources were found across the scanned pages
- Independent sources: 0
Issue: A quotable company summary is missing
Fix: Publish a company summary in your Organization JSON-LD: a "description" of at least 150 characters and two sentences that names the company, what it does and who or where it serves.
- Summary source: none
Partial: Brand positioning is indistinct
Fix: State what makes the company different in a way a reader could repeat: a named method, a measurable outcome, a specific focus.
Структура услуг
428 checked · 3 passed · 4 issues
Отдельная страница для каждой ключевой услуги
- Reason: No service/business-provider signals detected
- Core services detected: 0
Конкретное название услуги
- Services detected: 5
- Specific names: 5
- Generic names: 0
- Coverage percent: 100%
Partial: The result of the service is unclear
Fix: For each service, state the concrete outcome: what the client gets after the work is complete.
- Services evaluated: 5
- Services with outcome: 2
- Coverage percent: 40%
Issue: Not every service says who it is for
Fix: Add a \"Who it's for\" block to service pages and list the client types or tasks the offer suits.
- Services evaluated: 5
- Services with target audience: 0
- Coverage percent: 0%
Issue: Not every service says who it is not for
Fix: For complex or custom services, state limitations, requirements, and cases where the service is not a fit.
- Applicable services: 5
- Services with limitations/non-fit: 0
- Coverage percent: 0%
Наличие цены или диапазона цены
- Services evaluated: 5
- Visible price coverage: 5
- Structured-only coverage: 0
- Coverage percent: 100%
Issue: Timelines are missing for some services
Fix: State an approximate timeline or duration range for project and custom-delivery services.
- Applicable services: 5
- Services with timeline: 0
- Coverage percent: 0%
Issue: Process steps are missing for some services
Fix: Describe the service delivery process in at least three sequential steps.
- Applicable services: 5
- Services with process: 0
- Steps count: 0
- Coverage percent: 0%
Доказательства или кейсы по услуге
- Reason: No reliable service candidates or service-provider signals detected
- Services evaluated: 0
FAQ по конкретной услуге
- Services evaluated: 5
- Services with specific FAQ: 5
- Coverage percent: 100%
Слой доказательств
265 checked · 1 passed · 3 issues
Issue: Commercial claims are not backed up
Fix: Put the evidence next to the claim: a figure, a named client, a date, a certificate, a link to the source. A claim a reader cannot check reads as advertising.
Проверка заявлений об опыте
- Reason: The site makes no claims about its experience
Проверка заявлений о количестве клиентов
- Reason: The site makes no claims about how many clients it has
Проверка заявлений о результатах
- Reason: The site makes no claims about results achieved
Partial: The guarantee is promised but not explained
Fix: Tie the guarantee statement to distinct conditions: duration, scope, limitations, and the claims process.
- Source document found: no
- Structured warranty found: no
- Explanation signals count: 2
Видимость источников отзывов
- Reason: No visible or structured review/rating signals found
- Visible reviews found: 0
Фактическая глубина кейсов
- Reason: No case studies were found to read
Видимость сертификатов или лицензий
- Credential claims: yes
- Visible assets: 1
- Document links: 1
Issue: Too few links to proof outside the site
Fix: Add links to independent sources: review cards, registries, publications, certificates, or external case corroboration.
- Proof contexts found: yes
- External proof links count: 0
- Proof link types: none
Issue: Superlatives with nothing behind them
Fix: Back a superlative with what makes it true — a ranking, an award, a measured figure — or drop it: an unproven "best" costs trust and gives an AI nothing to quote.
Сигналы доверия
494 checked · 1 passed · 2 issues
Реальные контактные данные
- Corroborated values count: 2
- Independent sources count: 3
- Conflicting values: no
Partial: Legal company information is incomplete
Fix: Publish the legal company name and key registration details on a dedicated legal/company details page.
- Legal page URL: none
- Legal name found: yes
- Text length: 0
Физический адрес или зона оказания услуг
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Видимость экспертов или команды
- Reason: No service-provider/expert-business signals detected
- Usable Person count: 0
Указание авторов или экспертов
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Issue: The privacy policy is missing or perfunctory
Fix: Add an accessible privacy policy page and link to it next to data-collection forms.
- Forms/data collection detected: yes
- Privacy page URL: none
- Text length: 0
- Linked site-wide: no
Условия оказания услуг
- Reason: No order/payment/booking/contract signals detected
- Transaction signals: none
Issue: No reviews on the site
Fix: Add visible customer reviews or testimonials, and only mark up reviews that genuinely appear on the page.
- Visible reviews count: 0
- Structured Review count: 0
- AggregateRating found: no
- Review pages: 0
Кейсы
- Reason: No service-provider/business signals detected
- Case pages found: 0
Актуальность обновления контента
- Reason: No editorial/content pages or date signals detected
- Editorial pages: 0
Schema.org и JSON-LD
05 checked · 0 passed · 5 issues
Issue: No JSON-LD markup at all
Fix: Add at least one <script type=\"application/ld+json\"> block describing your organization so AI systems can read structured facts about your business.
- Pages scanned: 30
- Pages with JSON-LD: 0
- JSON-LD blocks found: 0
- Homepage JSON-LD: no
Валидация JSON-LD
- Reason: No JSON-LD found anywhere on the scanned site — nothing to validate
Issue: Organization markup is missing or incomplete
Fix: Add an Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD block with your company's name, url, logo and contact details so AI systems can identify who is behind this site.
- Organization type found: none
Разметка LocalBusiness
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Issue: No WebSite markup
Fix: Add a WebSite JSON-LD block (name and url, optionally a SearchAction) so AI systems can identify this as your site's canonical web presence.
- WebSite type found: none
Issue: WebPage markup is missing or incomplete
Fix: Add a WebPage JSON-LD entity (or a more specific subtype like AboutPage/ContactPage/FAQPage) to your pages so AI systems can understand what each page represents.
- WebPage type found: none
Issue: No BreadcrumbList markup
Fix: Add BreadcrumbList JSON-LD to your deeper pages (e.g. /services/consulting) so AI systems can understand where each page sits in your site's structure.
- Deep pages found: 26
- BreadcrumbList pages found: 0
Разметка Service
- Reason: No service signals (service-page URL/heading match, Microdata Service, or offer catalog) detected on the scanned site
- Service type found: none
Разметка Product / Offer
- Reason: No product/catalog signals detected on the scanned site
- Product entities found: 0
- Offer entities found: 0
Разметка FAQPage
- Reason: No FAQ/Q&A content detected anywhere on the scanned site
- FAQ blocks found: 0
Разметка Person
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Разметка Review
- Reason: No review signals (reviews/testimonials page match, or existing Review/AggregateRating/review property) detected on the scanned site
- Review entities found: 0
Разметка AggregateRating
- Reason: No review signals detected on the scanned site — nothing to aggregate a rating from
- AggregateRating entities found: 0
Ссылки sameAs
- Reason: No Organization, LocalBusiness, or Person entity found on the scanned site
- sameAs values found: 0
Зона обслуживания (areaServed)
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Почтовый адрес (PostalAddress)
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Соответствие Schema видимому контенту
- Reason: The site carries no valid JSON-LD to compare with its pages
Риск спамной или вводящей в заблуждение разметки
- Reason: The site carries no valid JSON-LD to compare with its pages
Готовность AI Summary
248 checked · 1 passed · 4 issues
Partial: Homepage has no AI summary
Fix: Add a compact company description near the main heading: what it does, who it serves, and what it offers.
- Character count: ≈440
- Sentence count: 2
- Initial HTML region: no
- Identity signal: yes
- Activity signal: no
- Context signal: yes
AI Summary на страницах услуг
- Reason: No dedicated service pages detected
- Service pages evaluated: 0
Issue: The key-facts block is missing or thin
Fix: Add a compact key-facts block: price, timeline, format, geography, audience, and key terms.
- Fact block source: none
- Facts found: 0
- Fact types: none
- Heading: none
- Visible/structured-only: structured-only
Issue: "Why choose us" has no proof behind it
Fix: Tie the \"why choose us\" block to concrete evidence: case studies, reviews, ratings, certificates, or measurable facts.
- Why-choose section URL: none
- Heading: none
- Proof types near: none
- Proof types site-wide: 1
Issue: The «best for» block is missing in places
Fix: Add a dedicated \"Who it's for\" or \"Best for\" block to the homepage and key offer pages.
- Key offer pages: 1
- Pages with best-for block: 0
- Coverage percent: 0%
- Heading: none
Issue: The «not for» block is missing in places
Fix: For complex and custom offers, add a compact block covering limitations and applicability conditions.
- Applicable offers: 5
- Pages with not-for block: 0
- Coverage percent: 0%
- Heading: none
Краткие выжимки кейсов
- Reason: No substantive case-study pages detected
- Case pages evaluated: 0
Partial: Wording is too abstract
Fix: Replace vague promises with checkable facts: what exactly you do, on what terms, with what result.
Partial: Too much empty filler text
Fix: Remove sentences that carry no information — an AI answer built from them says nothing about you.
Абзацы, которые легко цитировать
- Quotable paragraphs found: 5
Качество FAQ
01 checked · 0 passed · 1 issues
Issue: No FAQ on the site
Fix: Add a question-and-answer block on a dedicated FAQ page or on key service pages.
- Visible FAQ blocks: 0
Покрытие коммерческих вопросов
- Reason: No visible FAQ content found
- Commercial topic groups found: 0
Покрытие возражений
- Reason: No visible FAQ content found
- Objection topic groups found: 0
Покрытие локальных вопросов
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Покрытие сравнительных вопросов
- Reason: No visible FAQ content found
- Comparison question found: no
Вопросы выбора подрядчика или поставщика
- Reason: No visible FAQ content found
- Vendor-selection topic groups found: 0
Конкретность ответов
- Reason: AI evaluation was unavailable for this run
Разметка FAQPage
- Reason: No visible FAQ content found
- Pages with visible FAQ: 0
Естественные формулировки вопросов
- Reason: AI evaluation was unavailable for this run
Согласованность со страницами услуг
- Reason: No visible FAQ content found
- Services detected: 0
Готовность к AI-ответам
349 checked · 4 passed · 4 issues
Контент под рекомендательные запросы
Issue: "Best provider for…" questions are not covered
Fix: Answer how to choose a provider for this task — selection criteria, comparisons, and where you fit among the alternatives.
Покрытие проблемных запросов
Покрытие локальных запросов
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Issue: There is almost no comparison of options
Fix: Add a dedicated comparison of the options covering price, composition, outcome, limitations, and selection guidance.
- Comparable group type: yes
- Candidates: 0
- Comparison page URL: none
- Dimensions found: 0
- Strong/weak: none
- Heading: none
Partial: Too few pages for a reader who is choosing
Fix: Prepare decision-stage pages for core offers with terms, price, proof, FAQ, and a specific action.
- Offers evaluated: 5
- Decision-stage pages: 2
- Coverage percent: 40%
Issue: It is not clear how this differs from competitors
Fix: Name differences a reader can check — numbers, named methods, specific guarantees — instead of general claims.
Issue: Limitations are not admitted anywhere
Fix: Say plainly what you do not do and whom you do not suit — an honest limit is a strong trust signal for both people and AI.
Понятный следующий шаг
- Answer-oriented pages: 2
- Pages with specific next step: 2
- Coverage percent: 100%
Не шаблонный контент
Внешняя согласованность
301 checked · 0 passed · 0 issues
Видимость Google Business Profile
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Согласованность названия бренда
Согласованность адреса
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Согласованность телефона
Согласованность описания услуг
Видимость внешних отзывов
Внешние ссылки и цитирования
Partial: Too few links to official profiles
Fix: Add links to the company's official profiles on the site and duplicate them in sameAs.
- Visible official profiles: 1
- Structured profiles: 0
- Overlapping profiles: 0
Упоминания бренда
Риск противоречий
Коммерческое доверие
3210 checked · 3 passed · 3 issues
Partial: The first screen does not say what is on offer
Fix: Place the name or a clear heading, a specific offer, and the main target action near the start of the homepage.
- Identity found: yes
- Offer found: yes
- Primary action found: no
- CTA label: none
- Method: initial HTML source region
Partial: The call to action is hard to find
Fix: Add a specific action button near the start of the page: order, book, get a quote, or get started.
- Primary CTA count: 90
- Generic CTA count: ≈110
- Initial-region CTA: none
- Label: none
- Target: none
Наличие формы заявки
- Service-provider signal: no
- Quote/contact CTA: no
- Lead form found: yes
- Contact page or channel: yes
Видимость цены или условий
- Reason: No offering/commercial signals detected
- Visible price/condition count: 0
Объяснение гарантий
- Explanation signals count: 2
- Structured warranty: no
Issue: No proof next to the call to action
Fix: Place a review, rating, case study, or other verifiable proof near the primary action.
- Proof type: none
- Structurally near: no
- Proof source URL: none
- Proximity reason: not structurally near
Быстрый способ связи
- Reason: No provider/contact-oriented signals detected
- Fast contact types: n/a
Issue: Legal pages are missing
Fix: Add links to the privacy policy and terms near forms, checkout, or payment.
- Data collection: yes
- Transaction: no
- Privacy page/link: none
- Terms page/link: none
- Linked near flow: no
Мобильная готовность к конверсии
- Viewport adapts to the device: The page declares itself usable on a phone
Issue: Too much distracts from the action
Fix: Leave one obvious next step on the page. Several different actions asking for the same attention means none of them is the next step.
Partial: No trust signals where the decision is made
Fix: Add trust signals near the form or button: reviews, contacts, guarantees, company details, or terms.
Partial: The next step is not obvious
Fix: Use specific actions such as \"Get a quote\", \"Book now\", \"Order\", or \"Start a check\" instead of a vague \"Learn more\".
- Key offer pages: 0
- Pages with specific CTA: 0
- Initial specific CTA: no
- Generic CTA count: ≈110
- Label: none
Want to know which of these problems your own site has? Run an AIRA check.