GEO audit of a service company site — AI readiness 37/100
An anonymised report of a real site — service company site. The address, the company name and any identifying quotes are hidden.
This audit in brief
The site is service company site, AI readiness 37 out of 100. about 30 pages were read, covering 100% of the applicable criteria.
The strongest area is “Conversion Trust” — 92 out of 100.
The three weakest areas: External Consistency — 0/100, Proof Layer — 10/100, FAQ Quality — 19/100.
“External Consistency” is only partly prepared: some criteria pass, others do not.
The report at a glance
Strengths
- Conversion Trust92/100
- Schema.org / JSON-LD60/100
- Trust Signals51/100
Main problems
- External Consistency0/100
- Proof Layer10/100
- FAQ Quality19/100
- Answer Readiness22/100
- Service Structure22/100
Anonymised example report: services site. Addresses, names and quotes are hidden.
~30 pages
criteria evaluated: 100%
criteria 3.11.0 · engine 1.50.0
Доступность для AI
—16 checked · 15 passed · 1 issues
Главная страница возвращает HTTP 200
Финальный URL использует HTTPS
robots.txt присутствует
- HTTP status: ≈200
XML sitemap присутствует
- URLs indexed: 93
OAI-SearchBot разрешён
Политика для GPTBot ясна
Googlebot разрешён
YandexBot разрешён
Нет глобального Disallow: /
- Global block: None
HTML-контент доступен
Страницы, закрытые от индексации
- Homepage closed to indexing: no
- Pages closed to indexing: 0
- Share of read pages: 0%
Фавиконка присутствует
- HTTP status: ≈200
Несуществующие страницы отвечают 404
- HTTP status: ≈400
Язык и кодировка объявлены
Canonical главной корректен
Issue: Root redirects diverge or run long
Fix: Redirect every spelling of the site root (http, www) to the one canonical address — a divergent variant is a second site competing for the same identity
Понятность компании как сущности
3312 checked · 5 passed · 4 issues
Ясность названия бренда
Видимость юридического лица
- Identifier value: ******5159
Понятность категории бизнеса
Чёткое описание «что мы делаем»
- Character count: ≈150
- Subject signal: yes
- Activity signal: yes
- Structured corroboration: yes
География оказания услуг
Issue: Target audience is unclear
Fix: Add a dedicated \"Who it's for\" section and explicitly list the types of customers, companies, or users the offering fits.
- Audience source: none
Partial: About page says too little
Fix: Expand your About page with more substance (at least a few short paragraphs) and add supporting details — company name, description, legal info, team, history/mission, and a contact link.
- Text length: ≈2420
- Supporting signals count: 2
Partial: Contact page is incomplete
Fix: You have multiple contact channels but no dedicated contact page. Create one that lists them together.
- Contact page URL: none
- Contact form: no
- Channels count: 3
Issue: sameAs profiles are incomplete
Fix: Add sameAs links to your official company profiles and duplicate those links visibly on the site.
- sameAs count: 0
- Visible profiles count: 0
- Overlapping profiles count: 0
Issue: Company name is written differently across pages
Fix: Use the same brand and legal name everywhere — in Schema.org, Open Graph, and your main pages.
Issue: A quotable company summary is missing or too thin
Fix: Publish a company summary in your Organization JSON-LD: a "description" of at least 150 characters and two sentences that names the company, what it does and who or where it serves.
- Summary source: none
Partial: Brand positioning is indistinct
Fix: State what makes the company different in a way a reader could repeat: a named method, a measurable outcome, a specific focus.
Структура услуг
225 checked · 1 passed · 3 issues
Отдельная страница для каждой ключевой услуги
- Reason: No service/business-provider signals detected
- Core services detected: 0
Конкретное название услуги
- Services detected: 10
- Specific names: 10
- Generic names: 0
- Coverage percent: 100%
Partial: The result of the service is unclear
Fix: For each service, state the concrete outcome: what the client gets after the work is complete.
- Services evaluated: 10
- Services with outcome: 1
- Coverage percent: 10%
Issue: Not every service says who it is for
Fix: Add a \"Who it's for\" block to service pages and list the client types or tasks the offer suits.
- Services evaluated: 10
- Services with target audience: 0
- Coverage percent: 0%
Кому услуга не подходит
- Reason: No project/custom-delivery service candidates detected
- Applicable services: 0
Issue: Price is not visible for every service
Fix: For each service, state a price, price range, starting-from cost, or a clear custom-quote condition.
- Services evaluated: 10
- Visible price coverage: 0
- Structured-only coverage: 0
- Coverage percent: 0%
Понятные сроки оказания услуги
- Reason: No project/custom-delivery service candidates detected
- Applicable services: 0
Этапы работы
- Reason: No project/custom-delivery service candidates detected
- Applicable services: 0
Доказательства или кейсы по услуге
- Reason: No reliable service candidates or service-provider signals detected
- Services evaluated: 0
Issue: Not every service has its own FAQ
Fix: Add service-specific questions and answers on each core service's own page.
- Services evaluated: 10
- Services with specific FAQ: 0
- Coverage percent: 0%
Слой доказательств
105 checked · 1 passed · 3 issues
Issue: Not every commercial claim is backed up
Fix: Put the evidence next to the claim: a figure, a named client, a date, a certificate, a link to the source. A claim a reader cannot check reads as advertising.
Issue: Claims about experience are unsupported
Fix: Show what the experience consists of: since when, how many projects, in which industries. "Years on the market" without content is not experience, it is age.
Проверка заявлений о количестве клиентов
- Reason: The site makes no claims about how many clients it has
Проверка заявлений о результатах
- Reason: The site makes no claims about results achieved
Partial: The guarantee is promised but not explained
Fix: Tie the guarantee statement to distinct conditions: duration, scope, limitations, and the claims process.
- Source document found: no
- Structured warranty found: no
- Explanation signals count: 1
Видимость источников отзывов
- Reason: No visible or structured review/rating signals found
- Visible reviews found: 0
Фактическая глубина кейсов
- Reason: No case studies were found to read
Видимость сертификатов или лицензий
- Reason: No certificate/license/accreditation claim found
- Credential claims: 0
Issue: Too few links to proof outside the site
Fix: Add links to independent sources: review cards, registries, publications, certificates, or external case corroboration.
- Proof contexts found: yes
- External proof links count: 0
- Proof link types: none
Неподтверждённые превосходные заявления
Сигналы доверия
514 checked · 2 passed · 1 issues
Реальные контактные данные
- Corroborated values count: 2
- Independent sources count: 4
- Conflicting values: no
Partial: Legal company information is incomplete
Fix: Publish the legal company name and key registration details on a dedicated legal/company details page.
- Legal page URL: none
- Legal name found: yes
- Text length: 0
Физический адрес или зона оказания услуг
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Видимость экспертов или команды
- Reason: No service-provider/expert-business signals detected
- Usable Person count: 0
Указание авторов или экспертов
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Политика конфиденциальности
- Forms/data collection detected: yes
- Text length: ≈1450
- Linked site-wide: yes
Условия оказания услуг
- Reason: No order/payment/booking/contract signals detected
- Transaction signals: none
Issue: Too few reviews on the site
Fix: Add visible customer reviews or testimonials, and only mark up reviews that genuinely appear on the page.
- Visible reviews count: 0
- Structured Review count: 0
- AggregateRating found: no
- Review pages: 0
Кейсы
- Reason: No service-provider/business signals detected
- Case pages found: 0
Актуальность обновления контента
- Reason: No editorial/content pages or date signals detected
- Editorial pages: 0
Schema.org и JSON-LD
6011 checked · 7 passed · 4 issues
Наличие JSON-LD
- Pages scanned: 30
- Pages with JSON-LD: 30
- JSON-LD blocks found: 30
- Homepage JSON-LD: yes
Валидация JSON-LD
- Total blocks: 30
- Valid blocks: 30
- Invalid blocks: 0
- Pages with invalid JSON-LD: 0
Разметка Organization
Разметка LocalBusiness
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Разметка WebSite
Issue: WebPage markup is missing or incomplete
Fix: Add a WebPage JSON-LD entity (or a more specific subtype like AboutPage/ContactPage/FAQPage) to your pages so AI systems can understand what each page represents.
- WebPage type found: none
Issue: No BreadcrumbList markup
Fix: Add BreadcrumbList JSON-LD to your deeper pages (e.g. /services/consulting) so AI systems can understand where each page sits in your site's structure.
- Deep pages found: 26
- BreadcrumbList pages found: 0
Разметка Service
- Reason: No service signals (service-page URL/heading match, Microdata Service, or offer catalog) detected on the scanned site
- Service type found: none
Разметка Product / Offer
- Reason: No product/catalog signals detected on the scanned site
- Product entities found: 0
- Offer entities found: 0
Issue: No FAQPage markup
Fix: Mark up your existing FAQ section with FAQPage JSON-LD (Question/Answer pairs) so AI systems can surface your answers directly.
- FAQ blocks found: 2
- FAQPage schema pages: 0
Разметка Person
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Разметка Review
- Reason: No review signals (reviews/testimonials page match, or existing Review/AggregateRating/review property) detected on the scanned site
- Review entities found: 0
Разметка AggregateRating
- Reason: No review signals detected on the scanned site — nothing to aggregate a rating from
- AggregateRating entities found: 0
Issue: sameAs links are missing or invalid
Fix: Add sameAs links to your Organization (or LocalBusiness/Person) JSON-LD pointing to your official profiles (social media, Wikipedia, Crunchbase, etc.) and other authoritative external listings.
- Valid sameAs count: 0
- Invalid sameAs count: 0
Зона обслуживания (areaServed)
Почтовый адрес (PostalAddress)
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Соответствие Schema видимому контенту
Риск спамной или вводящей в заблуждение разметки
Готовность AI Summary
438 checked · 2 passed · 2 issues
Partial: The homepage has no proper AI summary
Fix: Add a compact company description near the main heading: what it does, who it serves, and what it offers.
- Character count: 54
- Sentence count: 1
- Initial HTML region: no
- Identity signal: no
- Activity signal: no
- Context signal: yes
AI Summary на страницах услуг
- Service pages evaluated: 10
- Strong summaries: 8
- Weak summaries: 2
- Coverage percent: 80%
Partial: The key-facts block is missing or thin
Fix: Add a compact key-facts block: price, timeline, format, geography, audience, and key terms.
- Facts found: 10
- Fact types: none
- Heading: none
- Visible/structured-only: structured-only
Issue: "Why choose us" has no proof behind it
Fix: Tie the \"why choose us\" block to concrete evidence: case studies, reviews, ratings, certificates, or measurable facts.
- Why-choose section URL: none
- Heading: none
- Proof types near: none
- Proof types site-wide: 1
Issue: The «best for» block is missing in places
Fix: Add a dedicated \"Who it's for\" or \"Best for\" block to the homepage and key offer pages.
- Key offer pages: 27
- Pages with best-for block: 0
- Coverage percent: 0%
- Heading: none
Блок ограничений
- Reason: No project/custom/complex offer candidates detected
- Applicable offers: 0
Краткие выжимки кейсов
- Reason: No substantive case-study pages detected
- Case pages evaluated: 0
Partial: Wording is too abstract
Fix: Replace vague promises with checkable facts: what exactly you do, on what terms, with what result.
Partial: Too much empty filler text
Fix: Remove sentences that carry no information — an AI answer built from them says nothing about you.
Абзацы, которые легко цитировать
- Quotable paragraphs found: 14
Качество FAQ
197 checked · 1 passed · 5 issues
Partial: FAQ is missing or too small
Fix: Add a question-and-answer block on a dedicated FAQ page or on key service pages.
- Visible FAQ blocks: 2
- Unique questions: 2
- Pages with FAQ: 1
- Dedicated FAQ pages: 0
Issue: Buying questions are not answered
Fix: Add answers about pricing, timelines, ordering process, payment, or service availability.
- Commercial topic groups found: 0
Issue: Objections are not answered
Fix: Add answers to common objections: cancellation, refunds, guarantees, limitations, security, or support.
- Objection topic groups found: 0
Issue: Local questions are not answered
Fix: Add questions and answers about service area, address, directions, parking, or local delivery.
- Local topic groups found: 0
Покрытие сравнительных вопросов
- Reason: Only one offering was found — nothing objective to compare
- Comparison question found: no
Вопросы выбора подрядчика или поставщика
- Reason: The site does not show service/solution provider signals
- Vendor-selection topic groups found: 0
Конкретность ответов
- FAQ pairs reviewed: 2
- Share of specific answers: 100%
Issue: FAQPage markup is missing on some FAQ blocks
Fix: Add FAQPage JSON-LD to every page where a question-and-answer block is visible to users.
- Pages with visible FAQ: 1
- Pages with FAQPage schema: 0
- Coverage percent: 0
Issue: Questions are not worded the way clients ask them
Fix: Phrase questions the way customers actually ask them out loud — that is the wording AI systems match against.
- FAQ pairs reviewed: 2
- Share of naturally phrased questions: 0%
Согласованность со страницами услуг
- Reason: No reliable service/product candidates were found
- Services detected: 0
Готовность к AI-ответам
2210 checked · 3 passed · 5 issues
Контент под рекомендательные запросы
Issue: "Best provider for…" questions are not covered
Fix: Answer how to choose a provider for this task — selection criteria, comparisons, and where you fit among the alternatives.
Issue: Problem-driven questions are not covered
Fix: Describe the problem the customer starts from, in their own words — not only the service you sell.
Issue: Not every local question is covered
Fix: Tie core services to service-area regions on the relevant pages and in areaServed.
- Geographic offers: 10
- Offers with local coverage: 0
- Coverage percent: 0%
- Geography signals: none
Issue: There is almost no comparison of options
Fix: Add a dedicated comparison of the options covering price, composition, outcome, limitations, and selection guidance.
- Comparable group type: yes
- Candidates: 0
- Comparison page URL: none
- Dimensions found: 0
- Strong/weak: none
- Heading: none
Partial: Too few pages for a reader who is choosing
Fix: Prepare decision-stage pages for core offers with terms, price, proof, FAQ, and a specific action.
- Offers evaluated: 10
- Decision-stage pages: 5
- Coverage percent: 50%
Partial: It is not clear how this differs from competitors
Fix: Name differences a reader can check — numbers, named methods, specific guarantees — instead of general claims.
Issue: Limitations are not admitted anywhere
Fix: Say plainly what you do not do and whom you do not suit — an honest limit is a strong trust signal for both people and AI.
Понятный следующий шаг
- Answer-oriented pages: 5
- Pages with specific next step: 5
- Coverage percent: 100%
Не шаблонный контент
Внешняя согласованность
01 checked · 0 passed · 1 issues
Видимость Google Business Profile
Согласованность названия бренда
Согласованность адреса
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Согласованность телефона
Согласованность описания услуг
Видимость внешних отзывов
Внешние ссылки и цитирования
Issue: Too few links to official profiles
Fix: Add links to the company's official profiles on the site and duplicate them in sameAs.
- Visible official profiles: 0
- Structured profiles: 0
- Overlapping profiles: 0
- Platforms: none
Упоминания бренда
Риск противоречий
Коммерческое доверие
9211 checked · 5 passed · 2 issues
Понятность оффера на первом экране
- Identity found: yes
- Offer found: yes
- Primary action found: yes
- Method: initial HTML source region
Видимость CTA
- Primary CTA count: 90
- Generic CTA count: ≈110
- Initial-region CTA: primary
Partial: Leaving a request is hard or impossible
Fix: Add a short lead-capture form with a clear submit button and a field for the visitor's message.
- Service-provider signal: no
- Quote/contact CTA: no
- Lead form found: no
- Contact page or channel: yes
Issue: Price and conditions are not visible
Fix: State a price, a range, a starting-from price, or a clear custom-quote condition on the offer page.
- Visible price/condition count: 2
- Structured-only count: 0
Partial: The guarantee is not explained
Fix: If you make a guarantee or refund claim, state its duration, conditions, limitations, and how to request it.
- Explanation signals count: 1
- Structured warranty: no
Issue: Proof next to the call to action is insufficient
Fix: Place a review, rating, case study, or other verifiable proof near the primary action.
- Proof type: none
- Structurally near: no
- Proof source URL: none
- Proximity reason: not structurally near
Быстрый способ связи
- Reason: No provider/contact-oriented signals detected
- Fast contact types: n/a
Partial: Legal pages are incomplete
Fix: Add links to the privacy policy and terms near forms, checkout, or payment.
- Data collection: yes
- Transaction: no
- Terms page/link: none
- Linked near flow: no
Мобильная готовность к конверсии
- Viewport adapts to the device: The page declares itself usable on a phone
Низкий уровень отвлекающих элементов
Partial: Trust signals where the decision is made are insufficient
Fix: Add trust signals near the form or button: reviews, contacts, guarantees, company details, or terms.
Понятный следующий шаг
- Key offer pages: 27
- Pages with specific CTA: 27
- Initial specific CTA: yes
- Generic CTA count: ≈110
Want to know which of these problems your own site has? Run an AIRA check.