GEO audit of a service company site — AI readiness 47/100

An anonymised report of a real site — service company site. The address, the company name and any identifying quotes are hidden.

This audit in brief

An audit of a service company site. The score is 47 out of 100; about 30 pages were read and 100% of the criteria evaluated.

The strongest area is “AI Access & Crawlability” — 100 out of 100.

The three weakest areas: Entity Clarity — 13/100, Service Structure — 25/100, AI Summary Readiness — 26/100.

“Entity Clarity” is only partly prepared: some criteria pass, others do not.

The report at a glance

Strengths

  • AI Access & Crawlability100/100
  • Schema.org / JSON-LD67/100
  • Trust Signals67/100

Main problems

  • Entity Clarity13/100
  • Service Structure25/100
  • AI Summary Readiness26/100
  • Proof Layer27/100
  • External Consistency30/100

This example was updated after a re-check (2026-09).

Anonymised example report: services site. Addresses, names and quotes are hidden.

47of 100
Readiness for AI recommendations

~30 pages

criteria evaluated: 100%

criteria 3.9.0 · engine 1.43.0

Доступность для AI

100

16 checked · 16 passed · 0 issues

  • Главная страница возвращает HTTP 200

  • Финальный URL использует HTTPS

  • robots.txt присутствует

    • HTTP status: ≈200
  • XML sitemap присутствует

    • URLs indexed: 39
  • OAI-SearchBot разрешён

  • Политика для GPTBot ясна

  • Googlebot разрешён

  • YandexBot разрешён

  • Нет глобального Disallow: /

    • Global block: None
  • HTML-контент доступен

  • Страницы, закрытые от индексации

    • Homepage closed to indexing: no
    • Pages closed to indexing: 0
    • Share of read pages: 0%
  • Фавиконка присутствует

    • HTTP status: ≈200
  • Несуществующие страницы отвечают 404

    • HTTP status: ≈400
  • Язык и кодировка объявлены

  • Canonical главной корректен

  • Редиректы корня сходятся

Понятность компании как сущности

13

10 checked · 2 passed · 3 issues

  • Partial: Brand name is unclear

    Fix: Only one source confirms this name. Add it to a second independent source (e.g. WebSite JSON-LD or Open Graph og:site_name) to remove ambiguity.

  • Видимость юридического лица

    • Identifier value: ********1598
  • Partial: Business category is unclear

    Fix: State your business category consistently in Organization/Service/Product JSON-LD, the homepage title, and your company summary.

  • Partial: The «what we do» statement is unconvincing

    Fix: Add a short paragraph to the homepage that directly explains what the company does and what services or products it offers.

    • Character count: ≈370
    • Subject signal: no
    • Activity signal: yes
    • Structured corroboration: yes
  • География оказания услуг

    • Reason: No local/geographic service signals (LocalBusiness, existing areaServed, or a service tied to a physical location) detected
    • areaServed found: no
  • Issue: Target audience is unclear

    Fix: Add a dedicated \"Who it's for\" section and explicitly list the types of customers, companies, or users the offering fits.

    • Audience source: none
  • Issue: About page says too little

    Fix: Add a substantive About page describing what you do, your history, your team, your legal details, and a link to contact.

    • About page found: no
  • Полнота страницы контактов

    • Contact form: yes
    • Channels count: 5
  • Partial: sameAs profiles are incomplete

    Fix: Only one official profile link was found. Add sameAs entries for your other official profiles and mirror them on the site.

    • sameAs count: 0
    • Visible profiles count: 1
    • Overlapping profiles count: 0
  • Согласованность сущности на страницах

    • Reason: Fewer than two independent strong name sources were found across the scanned pages
    • Independent sources: 1
  • Issue: A quotable company summary is missing

    Fix: Publish a company summary in your Organization JSON-LD: a "description" of at least 150 characters and two sentences that names the company, what it does and who or where it serves.

    • Summary source: none
  • Partial: Brand positioning is indistinct

    Fix: State what makes the company different in a way a reader could repeat: a named method, a measurable outcome, a specific focus.

Структура услуг

25

8 checked · 1 passed · 4 issues

  • Отдельная страница для каждой ключевой услуги

    • Reason: No service/business-provider signals detected
    • Core services detected: 0
  • Конкретное название услуги

    • Services detected: 6
    • Specific names: 6
    • Generic names: 0
    • Coverage percent: 100%
  • Partial: The result of the service is unclear

    Fix: For each service, state the concrete outcome: what the client gets after the work is complete.

    • Services evaluated: 6
    • Services with outcome: 2
    • Coverage percent: 33%
  • Issue: Not every service says who it is for

    Fix: Add a \"Who it's for\" block to service pages and list the client types or tasks the offer suits.

    • Services evaluated: 6
    • Services with target audience: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
  • Issue: Not every service says who it is not for

    Fix: For complex or custom services, state limitations, requirements, and cases where the service is not a fit.

    • Applicable services: 3
    • Services with limitations/non-fit: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
  • Partial: Price is not visible for every service

    Fix: For each service, state a price, price range, starting-from cost, or a clear custom-quote condition.

    • Services evaluated: 6
    • Visible price coverage: 3
    • Structured-only coverage: 0
    • Coverage percent: 50%
  • Issue: Timelines are missing for some services

    Fix: State an approximate timeline or duration range for project and custom-delivery services.

    • Applicable services: 3
    • Services with timeline: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
  • Issue: Process steps are missing for some services

    Fix: Describe the service delivery process in at least three sequential steps.

    • Applicable services: 3
    • Services with process: 0
    • Steps count: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
  • Доказательства или кейсы по услуге

    • Reason: No reliable service candidates or service-provider signals detected
    • Services evaluated: 0
  • Partial: Not every service has its own FAQ

    Fix: Add service-specific questions and answers on each core service's own page.

    • Services evaluated: 6
    • Services with specific FAQ: 1
    • Coverage percent: 17%

Слой доказательств

27

7 checked · 2 passed · 3 issues

  • Issue: Commercial claims are not backed up

    Fix: Put the evidence next to the claim: a figure, a named client, a date, a certificate, a link to the source. A claim a reader cannot check reads as advertising.

  • Issue: Claims about experience are unsupported

    Fix: Show what the experience consists of: since when, how many projects, in which industries. "Years on the market" without content is not experience, it is age.

  • Проверка заявлений о количестве клиентов

    • Reason: The site makes no claims about how many clients it has
  • Проверка заявлений о результатах

    • Reason: The site makes no claims about results achieved
  • Объяснение гарантий

    • Source document found: yes
    • Structured warranty found: no
    • Explanation signals count: 2
  • Partial: Reviews do not show where they came from

    Fix: Show the number of reviews and state where they come from: your own database, a company profile, or an independent platform.

    • Visible reviews found: 0
    • Structured reviews found: no
    • Review count: none
    • Review platform/source found: yes
  • Фактическая глубина кейсов

    • Reason: No case studies were found to read
  • Partial: Certificates and licences are shown unconvincingly

    Fix: Show the certificate, license, or accreditation along with the document name, the issuing organization, and a link to verification.

    • Credential claims: yes
    • Visible assets: 3
    • Document links: 2
  • Issue: Too few links to proof outside the site

    Fix: Add links to independent sources: review cards, registries, publications, certificates, or external case corroboration.

    • Proof contexts found: yes
    • External proof links count: 0
    • Proof link types: none
  • Неподтверждённые превосходные заявления

Сигналы доверия

67

5 checked · 3 passed · 1 issues

  • Реальные контактные данные

    • Corroborated values count: 2
    • Independent sources count: 5
    • Conflicting values: no
  • Partial: Legal company information is incomplete

    Fix: Publish the legal company name and key registration details on a dedicated legal/company details page.

    • Legal page URL: none
    • Legal name found: yes
    • Text length: 0
  • Физический адрес или зона оказания услуг

    • Visible address: yes
    • Structured address: yes
    • Fields found: 4
  • Видимость экспертов или команды

    • Reason: No service-provider/expert-business signals detected
    • Usable Person count: 0
  • Указание авторов или экспертов

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Политика конфиденциальности

    • Forms/data collection detected: yes
    • Text length: ≈12450
    • Linked site-wide: yes
  • Условия оказания услуг

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Issue: No reviews on the site

    Fix: Add visible customer reviews or testimonials, and only mark up reviews that genuinely appear on the page.

    • Visible reviews count: 0
    • Structured Review count: 0
    • AggregateRating found: no
    • Review pages: 0
  • Кейсы

    • Reason: No service-provider/business signals detected
    • Case pages found: 0
  • Актуальность обновления контента

    • Reason: No editorial/content pages or date signals detected
    • Editorial pages: 0

Schema.org и JSON-LD

67

10 checked · 7 passed · 3 issues

  • Наличие JSON-LD

    • Pages scanned: 30
    • Pages with JSON-LD: 4
    • JSON-LD blocks found: 6
    • Homepage JSON-LD: yes
  • Валидация JSON-LD

    • Total blocks: 6
    • Valid blocks: 6
    • Invalid blocks: 0
    • Pages with invalid JSON-LD: 0
  • Issue: Organization markup is missing or incomplete

    Fix: Add an Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD block with your company's name, url, logo and contact details so AI systems can identify who is behind this site.

    • Organization type found: none
  • Разметка LocalBusiness

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Issue: No WebSite markup

    Fix: Add a WebSite JSON-LD block (name and url, optionally a SearchAction) so AI systems can identify this as your site's canonical web presence.

    • WebSite type found: none
  • Разметка WebPage

  • Разметка BreadcrumbList

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Разметка Service

    • Reason: No service signals (service-page URL/heading match, Microdata Service, or offer catalog) detected on the scanned site
    • Service type found: none
  • Issue: Product / Offer markup is missing or unlinked

    Fix: Add Product and a related Offer with price, currency, availability and a URL so AI systems can understand what you sell.

    • Product entities found: 0
    • Offer entities found: 0
  • Разметка FAQPage

  • Разметка Person

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Разметка Review

    • Reason: No review signals (reviews/testimonials page match, or existing Review/AggregateRating/review property) detected on the scanned site
    • Review entities found: 0
  • Разметка AggregateRating

    • Reason: No review signals detected on the scanned site — nothing to aggregate a rating from
    • AggregateRating entities found: 0
  • Ссылки sameAs

    • Reason: No Organization, LocalBusiness, or Person entity found on the scanned site
    • sameAs values found: 0
  • Зона обслуживания (areaServed)

    • Reason: No geography signal (LocalBusiness, existing areaServed, or Service paired with an address/place) detected on the scanned site
    • areaServed found: no
  • Почтовый адрес (PostalAddress)

    • Fields found: 3
  • Соответствие Schema видимому контенту

  • Риск спамной или вводящей в заблуждение разметки

Готовность AI Summary

26

9 checked · 1 passed · 3 issues

  • Partial: Homepage has no AI summary

    Fix: Add a compact company description near the main heading: what it does, who it serves, and what it offers.

    • Character count: 58
    • Sentence count: 2
    • Initial HTML region: no
    • Identity signal: no
    • Activity signal: no
    • Context signal: yes
  • Partial: Service pages have no AI summary

    Fix: Add a short summary under the H1 of each service page: what the service is, its outcome, and who it's for.

    • Service pages evaluated: 6
    • Strong summaries: 1
    • Weak summaries: 5
    • Coverage percent: 17%
  • Partial: The key-facts block is missing or thin

    Fix: Add a compact key-facts block: price, timeline, format, geography, audience, and key terms.

    • Facts found: 16
    • Heading: none
    • Visible/structured-only: structured-only
  • Issue: "Why choose us" has no proof behind it

    Fix: Tie the \"why choose us\" block to concrete evidence: case studies, reviews, ratings, certificates, or measurable facts.

    • Why-choose section URL: none
    • Heading: none
    • Proof types near: none
    • Proof types site-wide: 1
  • Issue: The «best for» block is missing in places

    Fix: Add a dedicated \"Who it's for\" or \"Best for\" block to the homepage and key offer pages.

    • Key offer pages: 1
    • Pages with best-for block: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
    • Heading: none
  • Issue: The «not for» block is missing in places

    Fix: For complex and custom offers, add a compact block covering limitations and applicability conditions.

    • Applicable offers: 3
    • Pages with not-for block: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
    • Heading: none
  • Краткие выжимки кейсов

    • Reason: No substantive case-study pages detected
    • Case pages evaluated: 0
  • Partial: Wording is too abstract

    Fix: Replace vague promises with checkable facts: what exactly you do, on what terms, with what result.

  • Partial: Too much empty filler text

    Fix: Remove sentences that carry no information — an AI answer built from them says nothing about you.

  • Абзацы, которые легко цитировать

    • Quotable paragraphs found: 5

Качество FAQ

43

6 checked · 2 passed · 2 issues

  • Partial: No FAQ on the site

    Fix: Add a question-and-answer block on a dedicated FAQ page or on key service pages.

    • Visible FAQ blocks: 2
    • Unique questions: 2
    • Pages with FAQ: 1
    • Dedicated FAQ pages: 0
  • Partial: Buying questions are not answered

    Fix: Add answers about pricing, timelines, ordering process, payment, or service availability.

    • Commercial topic groups found: 1
  • Issue: Objections are not answered

    Fix: Add answers to common objections: cancellation, refunds, guarantees, limitations, security, or support.

    • Objection topic groups found: 0
  • Покрытие локальных вопросов

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Покрытие сравнительных вопросов

    • Reason: Only one offering was found — nothing objective to compare
    • Comparison question found: no
  • Вопросы выбора подрядчика или поставщика

    • Reason: The site does not show service/solution provider signals
    • Vendor-selection topic groups found: 0
  • Конкретность ответов

    • FAQ pairs reviewed: 13
    • Share of specific answers: 92%
  • Issue: FAQ has no FAQPage markup

    Fix: Add FAQPage JSON-LD to every page where a question-and-answer block is visible to users.

    • Pages with visible FAQ: 1
    • Pages with FAQPage schema: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0
  • Естественные формулировки вопросов

    • FAQ pairs reviewed: 13
    • Share of naturally phrased questions: 85%
  • Согласованность со страницами услуг

    • Reason: No reliable service/product candidates were found
    • Services detected: 0

Готовность к AI-ответам

57

9 checked · 6 passed · 3 issues

  • Контент под рекомендательные запросы

  • Issue: "Best provider for…" questions are not covered

    Fix: Answer how to choose a provider for this task — selection criteria, comparisons, and where you fit among the alternatives.

  • Покрытие проблемных запросов

  • Покрытие локальных запросов

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Issue: There is almost no comparison of options

    Fix: Add a dedicated comparison of the options covering price, composition, outcome, limitations, and selection guidance.

    • Comparable group type: yes
    • Candidates: 0
    • Comparison page URL: none
    • Dimensions found: 0
    • Strong/weak: none
    • Heading: none
  • Страницы для этапа выбора

    • Offers evaluated: 6
    • Decision-stage pages: 4
    • Coverage percent: 67%
  • Понятные отличия от конкурентов

  • Issue: Limitations are not admitted anywhere

    Fix: Say plainly what you do not do and whom you do not suit — an honest limit is a strong trust signal for both people and AI.

  • Понятный следующий шаг

    • Answer-oriented pages: 4
    • Pages with specific next step: 3
    • Coverage percent: 75%
  • Не шаблонный контент

Внешняя согласованность

30

1 checked · 0 passed · 0 issues

  • Видимость Google Business Profile

  • Согласованность названия бренда

  • Согласованность адреса

  • Согласованность телефона

  • Согласованность описания услуг

  • Видимость внешних отзывов

  • Внешние ссылки и цитирования

  • Partial: Too few links to official profiles

    Fix: Add links to the company's official profiles on the site and duplicate them in sameAs.

    • Visible official profiles: 2
    • Structured profiles: 0
    • Overlapping profiles: 0
  • Упоминания бренда

  • Риск противоречий

Коммерческое доверие

37

11 checked · 6 passed · 0 issues

  • Partial: The first screen does not say what is on offer

    Fix: Place the name or a clear heading, a specific offer, and the main target action near the start of the homepage.

    • Identity found: yes
    • Offer found: yes
    • Primary action found: no
    • CTA label: none
    • Method: initial HTML source region
  • Partial: The call to action is hard to find

    Fix: Add a specific action button near the start of the page: order, book, get a quote, or get started.

    • Primary CTA count: 8
    • Generic CTA count: 4
    • Initial-region CTA: none
    • Label: none
    • Target: none
  • Наличие формы заявки

    • Service-provider signal: no
    • Quote/contact CTA: no
    • Lead form found: yes
    • Contact page or channel: yes
  • Видимость цены или условий

    • Visible price/condition count: 25
    • Structured-only count: 1
  • Объяснение гарантий

    • Explanation signals count: 3
    • Structured warranty: no
  • Partial: No proof next to the call to action

    Fix: Place a review, rating, case study, or other verifiable proof near the primary action.

    • Structurally near: no
    • Proximity reason: not structurally near
  • Быстрый способ связи

    • Reason: No provider/contact-oriented signals detected
    • Fast contact types: n/a
  • Юридические страницы

    • Data collection: yes
    • Transaction: yes
    • Linked near flow: yes
  • Partial: Hard to convert on a phone

    Fix: Fix what still does not fit a phone screen: fixed pixel widths, tables with many columns, an over-long form, a blocked zoom. The viewport is declared correctly — these are what is left.

    • Elements with a fixed width wider than a phone screen: 1
  • Низкий уровень отвлекающих элементов

  • Блоки доверия рядом с точками конверсии

  • Partial: The next step is not obvious

    Fix: Use specific actions such as \"Get a quote\", \"Book now\", \"Order\", or \"Start a check\" instead of a vague \"Learn more\".

    • Key offer pages: 0
    • Pages with specific CTA: 0
    • Initial specific CTA: no
    • Generic CTA count: 4
    • Label: none

Want to know which of these problems your own site has? Run an AIRA check.

Similar examples

GEO Audit Example: service company site, partial readiness | AIRA