GEO audit of a service company site — AI readiness 47/100
An anonymised report of a real site — service company site. The address, the company name and any identifying quotes are hidden.
This audit in brief
An audit of a service company site. The score is 47 out of 100; about 30 pages were read and 100% of the criteria evaluated.
The strongest area is “AI Access & Crawlability” — 100 out of 100.
The three weakest areas: Entity Clarity — 13/100, Service Structure — 25/100, AI Summary Readiness — 26/100.
“Entity Clarity” is only partly prepared: some criteria pass, others do not.
The report at a glance
Strengths
- AI Access & Crawlability100/100
- Schema.org / JSON-LD67/100
- Trust Signals67/100
Main problems
- Entity Clarity13/100
- Service Structure25/100
- AI Summary Readiness26/100
- Proof Layer27/100
- External Consistency30/100
This example was updated after a re-check (2026-09).
Anonymised example report: services site. Addresses, names and quotes are hidden.
~30 pages
criteria evaluated: 100%
criteria 3.9.0 · engine 1.43.0
Доступность для AI
10016 checked · 16 passed · 0 issues
Главная страница возвращает HTTP 200
Финальный URL использует HTTPS
robots.txt присутствует
- HTTP status: ≈200
XML sitemap присутствует
- URLs indexed: 39
OAI-SearchBot разрешён
Политика для GPTBot ясна
Googlebot разрешён
YandexBot разрешён
Нет глобального Disallow: /
- Global block: None
HTML-контент доступен
Страницы, закрытые от индексации
- Homepage closed to indexing: no
- Pages closed to indexing: 0
- Share of read pages: 0%
Фавиконка присутствует
- HTTP status: ≈200
Несуществующие страницы отвечают 404
- HTTP status: ≈400
Язык и кодировка объявлены
Canonical главной корректен
Редиректы корня сходятся
Понятность компании как сущности
1310 checked · 2 passed · 3 issues
Partial: Brand name is unclear
Fix: Only one source confirms this name. Add it to a second independent source (e.g. WebSite JSON-LD or Open Graph og:site_name) to remove ambiguity.
Видимость юридического лица
- Identifier value: ********1598
Partial: Business category is unclear
Fix: State your business category consistently in Organization/Service/Product JSON-LD, the homepage title, and your company summary.
Partial: The «what we do» statement is unconvincing
Fix: Add a short paragraph to the homepage that directly explains what the company does and what services or products it offers.
- Character count: ≈370
- Subject signal: no
- Activity signal: yes
- Structured corroboration: yes
География оказания услуг
- Reason: No local/geographic service signals (LocalBusiness, existing areaServed, or a service tied to a physical location) detected
- areaServed found: no
Issue: Target audience is unclear
Fix: Add a dedicated \"Who it's for\" section and explicitly list the types of customers, companies, or users the offering fits.
- Audience source: none
Issue: About page says too little
Fix: Add a substantive About page describing what you do, your history, your team, your legal details, and a link to contact.
- About page found: no
Полнота страницы контактов
- Contact form: yes
- Channels count: 5
Partial: sameAs profiles are incomplete
Fix: Only one official profile link was found. Add sameAs entries for your other official profiles and mirror them on the site.
- sameAs count: 0
- Visible profiles count: 1
- Overlapping profiles count: 0
Согласованность сущности на страницах
- Reason: Fewer than two independent strong name sources were found across the scanned pages
- Independent sources: 1
Issue: A quotable company summary is missing
Fix: Publish a company summary in your Organization JSON-LD: a "description" of at least 150 characters and two sentences that names the company, what it does and who or where it serves.
- Summary source: none
Partial: Brand positioning is indistinct
Fix: State what makes the company different in a way a reader could repeat: a named method, a measurable outcome, a specific focus.
Структура услуг
258 checked · 1 passed · 4 issues
Отдельная страница для каждой ключевой услуги
- Reason: No service/business-provider signals detected
- Core services detected: 0
Конкретное название услуги
- Services detected: 6
- Specific names: 6
- Generic names: 0
- Coverage percent: 100%
Partial: The result of the service is unclear
Fix: For each service, state the concrete outcome: what the client gets after the work is complete.
- Services evaluated: 6
- Services with outcome: 2
- Coverage percent: 33%
Issue: Not every service says who it is for
Fix: Add a \"Who it's for\" block to service pages and list the client types or tasks the offer suits.
- Services evaluated: 6
- Services with target audience: 0
- Coverage percent: 0%
Issue: Not every service says who it is not for
Fix: For complex or custom services, state limitations, requirements, and cases where the service is not a fit.
- Applicable services: 3
- Services with limitations/non-fit: 0
- Coverage percent: 0%
Partial: Price is not visible for every service
Fix: For each service, state a price, price range, starting-from cost, or a clear custom-quote condition.
- Services evaluated: 6
- Visible price coverage: 3
- Structured-only coverage: 0
- Coverage percent: 50%
Issue: Timelines are missing for some services
Fix: State an approximate timeline or duration range for project and custom-delivery services.
- Applicable services: 3
- Services with timeline: 0
- Coverage percent: 0%
Issue: Process steps are missing for some services
Fix: Describe the service delivery process in at least three sequential steps.
- Applicable services: 3
- Services with process: 0
- Steps count: 0
- Coverage percent: 0%
Доказательства или кейсы по услуге
- Reason: No reliable service candidates or service-provider signals detected
- Services evaluated: 0
Partial: Not every service has its own FAQ
Fix: Add service-specific questions and answers on each core service's own page.
- Services evaluated: 6
- Services with specific FAQ: 1
- Coverage percent: 17%
Слой доказательств
277 checked · 2 passed · 3 issues
Issue: Commercial claims are not backed up
Fix: Put the evidence next to the claim: a figure, a named client, a date, a certificate, a link to the source. A claim a reader cannot check reads as advertising.
Issue: Claims about experience are unsupported
Fix: Show what the experience consists of: since when, how many projects, in which industries. "Years on the market" without content is not experience, it is age.
Проверка заявлений о количестве клиентов
- Reason: The site makes no claims about how many clients it has
Проверка заявлений о результатах
- Reason: The site makes no claims about results achieved
Объяснение гарантий
- Source document found: yes
- Structured warranty found: no
- Explanation signals count: 2
Partial: Reviews do not show where they came from
Fix: Show the number of reviews and state where they come from: your own database, a company profile, or an independent platform.
- Visible reviews found: 0
- Structured reviews found: no
- Review count: none
- Review platform/source found: yes
Фактическая глубина кейсов
- Reason: No case studies were found to read
Partial: Certificates and licences are shown unconvincingly
Fix: Show the certificate, license, or accreditation along with the document name, the issuing organization, and a link to verification.
- Credential claims: yes
- Visible assets: 3
- Document links: 2
Issue: Too few links to proof outside the site
Fix: Add links to independent sources: review cards, registries, publications, certificates, or external case corroboration.
- Proof contexts found: yes
- External proof links count: 0
- Proof link types: none
Неподтверждённые превосходные заявления
Сигналы доверия
675 checked · 3 passed · 1 issues
Реальные контактные данные
- Corroborated values count: 2
- Independent sources count: 5
- Conflicting values: no
Partial: Legal company information is incomplete
Fix: Publish the legal company name and key registration details on a dedicated legal/company details page.
- Legal page URL: none
- Legal name found: yes
- Text length: 0
Физический адрес или зона оказания услуг
- Visible address: yes
- Structured address: yes
- Fields found: 4
Видимость экспертов или команды
- Reason: No service-provider/expert-business signals detected
- Usable Person count: 0
Указание авторов или экспертов
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Политика конфиденциальности
- Forms/data collection detected: yes
- Text length: ≈12450
- Linked site-wide: yes
Условия оказания услуг
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Issue: No reviews on the site
Fix: Add visible customer reviews or testimonials, and only mark up reviews that genuinely appear on the page.
- Visible reviews count: 0
- Structured Review count: 0
- AggregateRating found: no
- Review pages: 0
Кейсы
- Reason: No service-provider/business signals detected
- Case pages found: 0
Актуальность обновления контента
- Reason: No editorial/content pages or date signals detected
- Editorial pages: 0
Schema.org и JSON-LD
6710 checked · 7 passed · 3 issues
Наличие JSON-LD
- Pages scanned: 30
- Pages with JSON-LD: 4
- JSON-LD blocks found: 6
- Homepage JSON-LD: yes
Валидация JSON-LD
- Total blocks: 6
- Valid blocks: 6
- Invalid blocks: 0
- Pages with invalid JSON-LD: 0
Issue: Organization markup is missing or incomplete
Fix: Add an Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD block with your company's name, url, logo and contact details so AI systems can identify who is behind this site.
- Organization type found: none
Разметка LocalBusiness
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Issue: No WebSite markup
Fix: Add a WebSite JSON-LD block (name and url, optionally a SearchAction) so AI systems can identify this as your site's canonical web presence.
- WebSite type found: none
Разметка WebPage
Разметка BreadcrumbList
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Разметка Service
- Reason: No service signals (service-page URL/heading match, Microdata Service, or offer catalog) detected on the scanned site
- Service type found: none
Issue: Product / Offer markup is missing or unlinked
Fix: Add Product and a related Offer with price, currency, availability and a URL so AI systems can understand what you sell.
- Product entities found: 0
- Offer entities found: 0
Разметка FAQPage
Разметка Person
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Разметка Review
- Reason: No review signals (reviews/testimonials page match, or existing Review/AggregateRating/review property) detected on the scanned site
- Review entities found: 0
Разметка AggregateRating
- Reason: No review signals detected on the scanned site — nothing to aggregate a rating from
- AggregateRating entities found: 0
Ссылки sameAs
- Reason: No Organization, LocalBusiness, or Person entity found on the scanned site
- sameAs values found: 0
Зона обслуживания (areaServed)
- Reason: No geography signal (LocalBusiness, existing areaServed, or Service paired with an address/place) detected on the scanned site
- areaServed found: no
Почтовый адрес (PostalAddress)
- Fields found: 3
Соответствие Schema видимому контенту
Риск спамной или вводящей в заблуждение разметки
Готовность AI Summary
269 checked · 1 passed · 3 issues
Partial: Homepage has no AI summary
Fix: Add a compact company description near the main heading: what it does, who it serves, and what it offers.
- Character count: 58
- Sentence count: 2
- Initial HTML region: no
- Identity signal: no
- Activity signal: no
- Context signal: yes
Partial: Service pages have no AI summary
Fix: Add a short summary under the H1 of each service page: what the service is, its outcome, and who it's for.
- Service pages evaluated: 6
- Strong summaries: 1
- Weak summaries: 5
- Coverage percent: 17%
Partial: The key-facts block is missing or thin
Fix: Add a compact key-facts block: price, timeline, format, geography, audience, and key terms.
- Facts found: 16
- Heading: none
- Visible/structured-only: structured-only
Issue: "Why choose us" has no proof behind it
Fix: Tie the \"why choose us\" block to concrete evidence: case studies, reviews, ratings, certificates, or measurable facts.
- Why-choose section URL: none
- Heading: none
- Proof types near: none
- Proof types site-wide: 1
Issue: The «best for» block is missing in places
Fix: Add a dedicated \"Who it's for\" or \"Best for\" block to the homepage and key offer pages.
- Key offer pages: 1
- Pages with best-for block: 0
- Coverage percent: 0%
- Heading: none
Issue: The «not for» block is missing in places
Fix: For complex and custom offers, add a compact block covering limitations and applicability conditions.
- Applicable offers: 3
- Pages with not-for block: 0
- Coverage percent: 0%
- Heading: none
Краткие выжимки кейсов
- Reason: No substantive case-study pages detected
- Case pages evaluated: 0
Partial: Wording is too abstract
Fix: Replace vague promises with checkable facts: what exactly you do, on what terms, with what result.
Partial: Too much empty filler text
Fix: Remove sentences that carry no information — an AI answer built from them says nothing about you.
Абзацы, которые легко цитировать
- Quotable paragraphs found: 5
Качество FAQ
436 checked · 2 passed · 2 issues
Partial: No FAQ on the site
Fix: Add a question-and-answer block on a dedicated FAQ page or on key service pages.
- Visible FAQ blocks: 2
- Unique questions: 2
- Pages with FAQ: 1
- Dedicated FAQ pages: 0
Partial: Buying questions are not answered
Fix: Add answers about pricing, timelines, ordering process, payment, or service availability.
- Commercial topic groups found: 1
Issue: Objections are not answered
Fix: Add answers to common objections: cancellation, refunds, guarantees, limitations, security, or support.
- Objection topic groups found: 0
Покрытие локальных вопросов
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Покрытие сравнительных вопросов
- Reason: Only one offering was found — nothing objective to compare
- Comparison question found: no
Вопросы выбора подрядчика или поставщика
- Reason: The site does not show service/solution provider signals
- Vendor-selection topic groups found: 0
Конкретность ответов
- FAQ pairs reviewed: 13
- Share of specific answers: 92%
Issue: FAQ has no FAQPage markup
Fix: Add FAQPage JSON-LD to every page where a question-and-answer block is visible to users.
- Pages with visible FAQ: 1
- Pages with FAQPage schema: 0
- Coverage percent: 0
Естественные формулировки вопросов
- FAQ pairs reviewed: 13
- Share of naturally phrased questions: 85%
Согласованность со страницами услуг
- Reason: No reliable service/product candidates were found
- Services detected: 0
Готовность к AI-ответам
579 checked · 6 passed · 3 issues
Контент под рекомендательные запросы
Issue: "Best provider for…" questions are not covered
Fix: Answer how to choose a provider for this task — selection criteria, comparisons, and where you fit among the alternatives.
Покрытие проблемных запросов
Покрытие локальных запросов
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Issue: There is almost no comparison of options
Fix: Add a dedicated comparison of the options covering price, composition, outcome, limitations, and selection guidance.
- Comparable group type: yes
- Candidates: 0
- Comparison page URL: none
- Dimensions found: 0
- Strong/weak: none
- Heading: none
Страницы для этапа выбора
- Offers evaluated: 6
- Decision-stage pages: 4
- Coverage percent: 67%
Понятные отличия от конкурентов
Issue: Limitations are not admitted anywhere
Fix: Say plainly what you do not do and whom you do not suit — an honest limit is a strong trust signal for both people and AI.
Понятный следующий шаг
- Answer-oriented pages: 4
- Pages with specific next step: 3
- Coverage percent: 75%
Не шаблонный контент
Внешняя согласованность
301 checked · 0 passed · 0 issues
Видимость Google Business Profile
Согласованность названия бренда
Согласованность адреса
Согласованность телефона
Согласованность описания услуг
Видимость внешних отзывов
Внешние ссылки и цитирования
Partial: Too few links to official profiles
Fix: Add links to the company's official profiles on the site and duplicate them in sameAs.
- Visible official profiles: 2
- Structured profiles: 0
- Overlapping profiles: 0
Упоминания бренда
Риск противоречий
Коммерческое доверие
3711 checked · 6 passed · 0 issues
Partial: The first screen does not say what is on offer
Fix: Place the name or a clear heading, a specific offer, and the main target action near the start of the homepage.
- Identity found: yes
- Offer found: yes
- Primary action found: no
- CTA label: none
- Method: initial HTML source region
Partial: The call to action is hard to find
Fix: Add a specific action button near the start of the page: order, book, get a quote, or get started.
- Primary CTA count: 8
- Generic CTA count: 4
- Initial-region CTA: none
- Label: none
- Target: none
Наличие формы заявки
- Service-provider signal: no
- Quote/contact CTA: no
- Lead form found: yes
- Contact page or channel: yes
Видимость цены или условий
- Visible price/condition count: 25
- Structured-only count: 1
Объяснение гарантий
- Explanation signals count: 3
- Structured warranty: no
Partial: No proof next to the call to action
Fix: Place a review, rating, case study, or other verifiable proof near the primary action.
- Structurally near: no
- Proximity reason: not structurally near
Быстрый способ связи
- Reason: No provider/contact-oriented signals detected
- Fast contact types: n/a
Юридические страницы
- Data collection: yes
- Transaction: yes
- Linked near flow: yes
Partial: Hard to convert on a phone
Fix: Fix what still does not fit a phone screen: fixed pixel widths, tables with many columns, an over-long form, a blocked zoom. The viewport is declared correctly — these are what is left.
- Elements with a fixed width wider than a phone screen: 1
Низкий уровень отвлекающих элементов
Блоки доверия рядом с точками конверсии
Partial: The next step is not obvious
Fix: Use specific actions such as \"Get a quote\", \"Book now\", \"Order\", or \"Start a check\" instead of a vague \"Learn more\".
- Key offer pages: 0
- Pages with specific CTA: 0
- Initial specific CTA: no
- Generic CTA count: 4
- Label: none
Want to know which of these problems your own site has? Run an AIRA check.