GEO audit of a media project — AI readiness 40/100

An anonymised report of a real site — media project. The address, the company name and any identifying quotes are hidden.

This audit in brief

This is an audit of a media project scoring 40 out of 100. The crawl read about 30 pages; 100% of the applicable criteria reached a verdict.

The strongest area is “External Consistency” — 100 out of 100.

The three weakest areas: Proof Layer — 22/100, FAQ Quality — 24/100, AI Summary Readiness — 31/100.

“Proof Layer” is only partly prepared: some criteria pass, others do not.

The report at a glance

Strengths

  • External Consistency100/100
  • Schema.org / JSON-LD57/100
  • Entity Clarity45/100

Main problems

  • Proof Layer22/100
  • FAQ Quality24/100
  • AI Summary Readiness31/100
  • Conversion Trust35/100
  • Service Structure39/100

Anonymised example report: media site. Addresses, names and quotes are hidden.

40of 100
Readiness for AI recommendations

~30 pages

criteria evaluated: 100%

criteria 3.3.0 · engine 1.28.0

Доступность для AI

10 checked · 10 passed · 0 issues

  • Главная страница возвращает HTTP 200

  • Финальный URL использует HTTPS

  • robots.txt присутствует

    • HTTP status: ≈200
  • XML sitemap присутствует

    • URLs indexed: ≈1980
  • OAI-SearchBot разрешён

  • Политика для GPTBot ясна

  • Googlebot разрешён

  • YandexBot разрешён

  • Нет глобального Disallow: /

    • Global block: None
  • HTML-контент доступен

Понятность компании как сущности

45

11 checked · 5 passed · 3 issues

  • Ясность названия бренда

  • Partial: Legal entity details are incomplete

    Fix: A legal/company name is visible, but no registration identifier (VAT/tax ID/company number, or ИНН/ОГРН) was found. Add one.

  • Issue: Business category is unclear

    Fix: State your business category consistently in Organization/Service/Product JSON-LD, the homepage title, and your company summary.

    • Category candidate: none
  • Чёткое описание «что мы делаем»

    • Character count: ≈250
    • Subject signal: yes
    • Activity signal: yes
    • Structured corroboration: yes
  • География оказания услуг

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Понятность целевой аудитории

  • Issue: About page says too little

    Fix: Add a substantive About page describing what you do, your history, your team, your legal details, and a link to contact.

    • About page found: no
  • Полнота страницы контактов

    • Contact form: no
    • Channels count: 3
  • Внешние профили sameAs

    • sameAs count: 0
    • Visible profiles count: 12
    • Overlapping profiles count: 0
  • Issue: Company details differ from page to page

    Fix: Use the same brand and legal name everywhere — in Schema.org, Open Graph, and your main pages.

  • Partial: A quotable company summary is missing

    Fix: Publish a company summary in your Organization JSON-LD: a "description" of at least 150 characters and two sentences that names the company, what it does and who or where it serves.

    • Character count: 33
    • Sentence count: 1
    • Identity signal: no
    • Activity signal: no
    • Context signal: no
  • Partial: Brand positioning is indistinct

    Fix: State what makes the company different in a way a reader could repeat: a named method, a measurable outcome, a specific focus.

Структура услуг

39

8 checked · 3 passed · 3 issues

  • Issue: Core services have no pages of their own

    Fix: Create a separate page for each core service with its own URL, H1, and description.

    • Core services detected: 10
    • Dedicated service pages: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
  • Конкретное название услуги

    • Services detected: 10
    • Specific names: 10
    • Generic names: 0
    • Coverage percent: 100%
  • Issue: The result of the service is unclear

    Fix: For each service, state the concrete outcome: what the client gets after the work is complete.

    • Services evaluated: 10
    • Services with outcome: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
  • Partial: Not every service says who it is for

    Fix: Add a \"Who it's for\" block to service pages and list the client types or tasks the offer suits.

    • Services evaluated: 10
    • Services with target audience: 1
    • Coverage percent: 10%
  • Issue: Not every service says who it is not for

    Fix: For complex or custom services, state limitations, requirements, and cases where the service is not a fit.

    • Applicable services: 1
    • Services with limitations/non-fit: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
  • Наличие цены или диапазона цены

    • Services evaluated: 10
    • Visible price coverage: 10
    • Structured-only coverage: 0
    • Coverage percent: 100%
  • Понятные сроки оказания услуги

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Этапы работы

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Partial: Not every service has proof of its own

    Fix: Connect each core service to a relevant case study, review, result, or other proof.

    • Services evaluated: 10
    • Services with specific proof: 0
    • Strong coverage: 0
    • Weak coverage: 10
  • FAQ по конкретной услуге

    • Services evaluated: 10
    • Services with specific FAQ: 10
    • Coverage percent: 100%

Слой доказательств

22

7 checked · 2 passed · 4 issues

  • Issue: Commercial claims are not backed up

    Fix: Put the evidence next to the claim: a figure, a named client, a date, a certificate, a link to the source. A claim a reader cannot check reads as advertising.

  • Issue: Claims about experience are unsupported

    Fix: Show what the experience consists of: since when, how many projects, in which industries. "Years on the market" without content is not experience, it is age.

  • Issue: Claims about client numbers are unsupported

    Fix: Name the clients, or say where the count comes from and as of when. A round number with no source is the first thing a reader discounts.

  • Проверка заявлений о результатах

    • Reason: The site makes no claims about results achieved
  • Объяснение гарантий

    • Reason: No guarantee/refund/warranty claim found
    • Explanation signals count: 0
  • Partial: Reviews do not show where they came from

    Fix: Show the number of reviews and state where they come from: your own database, a company profile, or an independent platform.

    • Visible reviews found: 0
    • Structured reviews found: no
    • Review count: none
    • Review platform/source found: yes
  • Issue: Case studies carry no facts

    Fix: Write each case as task, approach and result, with numbers. A case that only names the client proves nothing an assistant can repeat.

  • Видимость сертификатов или лицензий

    • Reason: No certificate/license/accreditation claim found
    • Credential claims: 0
  • Внешние ссылки на доказательства

    • Proof contexts found: yes
    • External proof links count: 20
  • Неподтверждённые превосходные заявления

Сигналы доверия

43

7 checked · 2 passed · 2 issues

  • Реальные контактные данные

    • Corroborated values count: 1
    • Independent sources count: 2
    • Conflicting values: no
  • Partial: Legal company information is incomplete

    Fix: Publish the legal company name and key registration details on a dedicated legal/company details page.

    • Legal page URL: none
    • Legal name found: yes
    • Identifier types: none
    • Text length: 0
  • Физический адрес или зона оказания услуг

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Partial: The people behind the site are barely visible

    Fix: Add a team or experts page with names, roles, and their connection to the organization.

    • Dedicated team page: no
    • Usable Person count: 20
    • Usable ProfileBlock count: 0
    • Visible ProfileBlock count: 0
  • Указание авторов или экспертов

    • Editorial pages: 29
    • Attributed pages: 29
    • Coverage percent: ≈100
  • Политика конфиденциальности

    • Reason: No data-collection forms detected
    • Forms/data collection detected: no
  • Условия оказания услуг

    • Reason: No order/payment/booking/contract signals detected
    • Transaction signals: none
  • Issue: No reviews on the site

    Fix: Add visible customer reviews or testimonials, and only mark up reviews that genuinely appear on the page.

    • Visible reviews count: 0
    • Structured Review count: 0
    • AggregateRating found: no
    • Review pages: 0
  • Partial: Too few case studies

    Fix: Add case studies describing the task, approach, and result for your core services.

    • Case pages found: 1
    • Substantive cases: 0
    • Section groups: 1
    • Text length: ≈16550
  • Issue: Content looks abandoned

    Fix: State publish and modified dates on your content and keep key content regularly updated.

    • Editorial pages: 20
    • Pages with reliable date: 20
    • Pages older than 730 days: 20
    • Date coverage percent: ≈100

Schema.org и JSON-LD

57

11 checked · 5 passed · 3 issues

  • Partial: No JSON-LD markup at all

    Fix: Add JSON-LD structured data to your homepage too — it's the page AI systems and search engines check first, and right now only secondary pages carry it.

    • Pages scanned: 30
    • Pages with JSON-LD: 29
    • JSON-LD blocks found: 29
    • Homepage JSON-LD: no
  • Валидация JSON-LD

    • Total blocks: 29
    • Valid blocks: 29
    • Invalid blocks: 0
    • Pages with invalid JSON-LD: 0
  • Partial: Organization markup is missing or incomplete

    Fix: Add the Organization JSON-LD block to your homepage too — it's currently only on a secondary page, and the homepage is what AI systems and search engines check first.

  • Разметка LocalBusiness

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Issue: No WebSite markup

    Fix: Add a WebSite JSON-LD block (name and url, optionally a SearchAction) so AI systems can identify this as your site's canonical web presence.

    • WebSite type found: none
  • Partial: WebPage markup is missing or incomplete

    Fix: Add WebPage-level JSON-LD to your homepage too — it's currently only on a secondary page.

  • Разметка BreadcrumbList

  • Разметка Service

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Разметка Product / Offer

    • Reason: No product/catalog signals detected on the scanned site
    • Product entities found: 0
    • Offer entities found: 0
  • Issue: No FAQPage markup

    Fix: Mark up your existing FAQ section with FAQPage JSON-LD (Question/Answer pairs) so AI systems can surface your answers directly.

    • FAQ blocks found: 7
    • FAQPage schema pages: 0
  • Разметка Person

  • Разметка Review

    • Reason: No review signals (reviews/testimonials page match, or existing Review/AggregateRating/review property) detected on the scanned site
    • Review entities found: 0
  • Разметка AggregateRating

    • Reason: No review signals detected on the scanned site — nothing to aggregate a rating from
    • AggregateRating entities found: 0
  • Issue: No sameAs links in the markup

    Fix: Add sameAs links to your Organization (or LocalBusiness/Person) JSON-LD pointing to your official profiles (social media, Wikipedia, Crunchbase, etc.) and other authoritative external listings.

    • Valid sameAs count: 0
    • Invalid sameAs count: 0
  • Зона обслуживания (areaServed)

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Почтовый адрес (PostalAddress)

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Соответствие Schema видимому контенту

  • Риск спамной или вводящей в заблуждение разметки

Готовность AI Summary

31

8 checked · 1 passed · 2 issues

  • Partial: Homepage has no AI summary

    Fix: Add a compact company description near the main heading: what it does, who it serves, and what it offers.

    • Character count: ≈160
    • Sentence count: 3
    • Initial HTML region: no
    • Identity signal: no
    • Activity signal: no
    • Context signal: yes
  • AI Summary на страницах услуг

    • Reason: No dedicated service pages detected
    • Service pages evaluated: 0
  • Partial: The key-facts block is missing or thin

    Fix: Add a compact key-facts block: price, timeline, format, geography, audience, and key terms.

    • Facts found: 13
    • Heading: none
    • Visible/structured-only: structured-only
  • Issue: "Why choose us" has no proof behind it

    Fix: Tie the \"why choose us\" block to concrete evidence: case studies, reviews, ratings, certificates, or measurable facts.

    • Proof types near: none
    • Proof types site-wide: 2
  • Блок «Кому подходит»

    • Key offer pages: 1
    • Pages with best-for block: 1
    • Coverage percent: 100%
  • Issue: The «not for» block is missing in places

    Fix: For complex and custom offers, add a compact block covering limitations and applicability conditions.

    • Applicable offers: 1
    • Pages with not-for block: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
    • Heading: none
  • Краткие выжимки кейсов

    • Reason: No substantive case-study pages detected
    • Case pages evaluated: 0
  • Partial: Wording is too abstract

    Fix: Replace vague promises with checkable facts: what exactly you do, on what terms, with what result.

  • Partial: Too much empty filler text

    Fix: Remove sentences that carry no information — an AI answer built from them says nothing about you.

  • Partial: Paragraphs are hard to quote

    Fix: Write self-contained paragraphs an AI can quote as a complete answer: one thought, concrete facts, no dependence on the rest of the page.

    • Quotable paragraphs found: 2

Качество FAQ

24

7 checked · 1 passed · 5 issues

  • Наличие FAQ

    • Visible FAQ blocks: 7
    • Unique questions: 7
    • Pages with FAQ: 2
    • Dedicated FAQ pages: 0
  • Issue: Buying questions are not answered

    Fix: Add answers about pricing, timelines, ordering process, payment, or service availability.

    • Commercial topic groups found: 0
  • Issue: Objections are not answered

    Fix: Add answers to common objections: cancellation, refunds, guarantees, limitations, security, or support.

    • Objection topic groups found: 0
  • Покрытие локальных вопросов

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Issue: Comparison questions are not answered

    Fix: Add questions about the differences between services, plans, products, or solution options.

    • Comparison topic groups found: 0
  • Вопросы выбора подрядчика или поставщика

    • Reason: The site does not show service/solution provider signals
    • Vendor-selection topic groups found: 0
  • Issue: FAQ answers are too vague

    Fix: Answer FAQ questions with terms, numbers and steps instead of restating the question or promising to discuss it individually.

    • FAQ pairs reviewed: 7
    • Share of specific answers: 29%
  • Issue: FAQ has no FAQPage markup

    Fix: Add FAQPage JSON-LD to every page where a question-and-answer block is visible to users.

    • Pages with visible FAQ: 2
    • Pages with FAQPage schema: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0
  • Partial: Questions are not worded the way clients ask them

    Fix: Phrase questions the way customers actually ask them out loud — that is the wording AI systems match against.

    • FAQ pairs reviewed: 7
    • Share of naturally phrased questions: 71%
  • Согласованность со страницами услуг

    • Reason: No reliable service/product candidates were found
    • Services detected: 0

Готовность к AI-ответам

43

9 checked · 5 passed · 4 issues

  • Контент под рекомендательные запросы

  • Issue: "Best provider for…" questions are not covered

    Fix: Answer how to choose a provider for this task — selection criteria, comparisons, and where you fit among the alternatives.

  • Покрытие проблемных запросов

  • Покрытие локальных запросов

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Issue: There is almost no comparison of options

    Fix: Add a dedicated comparison of the options covering price, composition, outcome, limitations, and selection guidance.

    • Comparable group type: yes
    • Candidates: 0
    • Comparison page URL: none
    • Dimensions found: 0
    • Strong/weak: none
    • Heading: none
  • Страницы для этапа выбора

    • Offers evaluated: 10
    • Decision-stage pages: 10
    • Coverage percent: 100%
  • Issue: It is not clear how this differs from competitors

    Fix: Name differences a reader can check — numbers, named methods, specific guarantees — instead of general claims.

  • Issue: Limitations are not admitted anywhere

    Fix: Say plainly what you do not do and whom you do not suit — an honest limit is a strong trust signal for both people and AI.

  • Понятный следующий шаг

    • Answer-oriented pages: 1
    • Pages with specific next step: 1
    • Coverage percent: 100%
  • Не шаблонный контент

Внешняя согласованность

100

1 checked · 1 passed · 0 issues

  • Видимость Google Business Profile

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Согласованность названия бренда

  • Согласованность адреса

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Согласованность телефона

  • Согласованность описания услуг

  • Видимость внешних отзывов

  • Внешние ссылки и цитирования

  • Ссылки на социальные сети и профили

    • Visible official profiles: 11
    • Structured profiles: 0
    • Overlapping profiles: 0
  • Упоминания бренда

  • Риск противоречий

Коммерческое доверие

35

10 checked · 4 passed · 0 issues

  • Partial: The first screen does not say what is on offer

    Fix: Place the name or a clear heading, a specific offer, and the main target action near the start of the homepage.

    • Identity found: yes
    • Offer found: yes
    • Primary action found: no
    • H1: none
    • CTA label: none
    • Method: initial HTML source region
  • Partial: The call to action is hard to find

    Fix: Add a specific action button near the start of the page: order, book, get a quote, or get started.

    • Primary CTA count: 1
    • Generic CTA count: 2
    • Initial-region CTA: none
    • Label: none
    • Target: none
  • Partial: Leaving a request is hard or impossible

    Fix: Add a short lead-capture form with a clear submit button and a field for the visitor's message.

    • Service-provider signal: yes
    • Quote/contact CTA: no
    • Lead form found: no
    • Contact page or channel: yes
  • Видимость цены или условий

    • Visible price/condition count: 6
    • Structured-only count: 0
  • Объяснение гарантий

    • Reason: No guarantee/refund/warranty claim found
    • Explanation signals count: 0
  • Partial: No proof next to the call to action

    Fix: Place a review, rating, case study, or other verifiable proof near the primary action.

    • Structurally near: no
    • Proximity reason: not structurally near
  • Быстрый способ связи

    • Source URL count: 29
    • Visible phone/messenger count: 48
    • Phone (masked): none
  • Юридические страницы

    • Reason: No data collection and no transaction signals detected
    • Privacy page/link: n/a
  • Мобильная готовность к конверсии

    • Viewport adapts to the device: The page declares itself usable on a phone
  • Низкий уровень отвлекающих элементов

  • Partial: No trust signals where the decision is made

    Fix: Add trust signals near the form or button: reviews, contacts, guarantees, company details, or terms.

    • Trust types near: none
  • Partial: The next step is not obvious

    Fix: Use specific actions such as \"Get a quote\", \"Book now\", \"Order\", or \"Start a check\" instead of a vague \"Learn more\".

    • Key offer pages: 0
    • Pages with specific CTA: 0
    • Initial specific CTA: no
    • Generic CTA count: 2
    • Label: none

Want to know which of these problems your own site has? Run an AIRA check.

Similar examples

AI SEO Audit Example — a media project, 40/100 | AIRA