GEO audit of a property developer site — AI readiness 58/100

An anonymised report of a real site — property developer site. The address, the company name and any identifying quotes are hidden.

This audit in brief

An audit of a property developer site. The score is 58 out of 100; about 30 pages were read and 99% of the criteria evaluated.

The strongest area is “Answer Readiness” — 73 out of 100.

The three weakest areas: Proof Layer — 17/100, AI Summary Readiness — 38/100, Service Structure — 42/100.

“Proof Layer” is only partly prepared: some criteria pass, others do not.

The report at a glance

Strengths

  • Answer Readiness73/100
  • Schema.org / JSON-LD71/100
  • Entity Clarity70/100

Main problems

  • Proof Layer17/100
  • AI Summary Readiness38/100
  • Service Structure42/100
  • Trust Signals46/100
  • FAQ Quality50/100

Anonymised example report: real-estate site. Addresses, names and quotes are hidden.

58of 100
Readiness for AI recommendations

~30 pages

criteria evaluated: 99%

criteria 2.2.0 · engine 1.24.0

Доступность для AI

10 checked · 10 passed · 0 issues

  • Главная страница возвращает HTTP 200

  • Финальный URL использует HTTPS

  • robots.txt присутствует

    • HTTP status: ≈200
  • XML sitemap присутствует

    • Sitemap: Sitemap is present, but its child sitemaps point to a different host we cannot follow
  • OAI-SearchBot разрешён

  • Политика для GPTBot ясна

  • Googlebot разрешён

  • YandexBot разрешён

  • Нет глобального Disallow: /

    • Global block: None
  • HTML-контент доступен

Понятность компании как сущности

70

12 checked · 6 passed · 1 issues

  • Ясность названия бренда

  • Partial: Legal entity details are incomplete

    Fix: A legal/company name is visible, but no registration identifier (VAT/tax ID/company number, or ИНН/ОГРН) was found. Add one.

  • Понятность категории бизнеса

  • Partial: The «what we do» statement is unconvincing

    • Character count: ≈210
    • Subject signal: yes
    • Activity signal: yes
    • Structured corroboration: no
  • География оказания услуг

  • Partial: Target audience is unclear

    Fix: Add a dedicated \"Who it's for\" section and explicitly list the types of customers, companies, or users the offering fits.

  • Качество страницы «О компании»

    • Text length: ≈4460
    • Supporting signals count: 5
  • Полнота страницы контактов

    • Contact form: no
    • Channels count: 4
  • Issue: sameAs profiles are incomplete

    Fix: Add sameAs links to your official company profiles and duplicate those links visibly on the site.

    • sameAs count: 0
    • Visible profiles count: 0
    • Overlapping profiles count: 0
  • Согласованность сущности на страницах

  • Partial: A quotable company summary is missing

    • Character count: ≈210
    • Sentence count: 2
    • Identity signal: yes
    • Activity signal: yes
    • Context signal: yes
  • Partial: Brand positioning is indistinct

    Fix: State what makes the company different in a way a reader could repeat: a named method, a measurable outcome, a specific focus.

Структура услуг

42

10 checked · 4 passed · 4 issues

  • Отдельная страница для каждой ключевой услуги

    • Core services detected: 10
    • Dedicated service pages: 10
    • Coverage percent: 100%
  • Конкретное название услуги

    • Services detected: 10
    • Specific names: 10
    • Generic names: 0
    • Coverage percent: 100%
  • Partial: The result of the service is unclear

    Fix: For each service, state the concrete outcome: what the client gets after the work is complete.

    • Services evaluated: 10
    • Services with outcome: 2
    • Coverage percent: 20%
  • Issue: Not every service says who it is for

    Fix: Add a \"Who it's for\" block to service pages and list the client types or tasks the offer suits.

    • Services evaluated: 10
    • Services with target audience: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
  • Issue: Not every service says who it is not for

    Fix: For complex or custom services, state limitations, requirements, and cases where the service is not a fit.

    • Applicable services: 10
    • Services with limitations/non-fit: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
  • Наличие цены или диапазона цены

    • Services evaluated: 10
    • Visible price coverage: 10
    • Structured-only coverage: 0
    • Coverage percent: 100%
  • Issue: Timelines are missing for some services

    Fix: State an approximate timeline or duration range for project and custom-delivery services.

    • Applicable services: 10
    • Services with timeline: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
  • Issue: Process steps are missing for some services

    Fix: Describe the service delivery process in at least three sequential steps.

    • Applicable services: 10
    • Services with process: 0
    • Steps count: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
  • Partial: Not every service has proof of its own

    Fix: Connect each core service to a relevant case study, review, result, or other proof.

    • Services evaluated: 10
    • Services with specific proof: 0
    • Strong coverage: 0
    • Weak coverage: 10
  • FAQ по конкретной услуге

    • Services evaluated: 10
    • Services with specific FAQ: 10
    • Coverage percent: 100%

Слой доказательств

17

7 checked · 0 passed · 5 issues

  • Issue: Commercial claims are not backed up

    Fix: Put the evidence next to the claim: a figure, a named client, a date, a certificate, a link to the source. A claim a reader cannot check reads as advertising.

  • Issue: Claims about experience are unsupported

    Fix: Show what the experience consists of: since when, how many projects, in which industries. "Years on the market" without content is not experience, it is age.

  • Проверка заявлений о количестве клиентов

    • Reason: The site makes no claims about how many clients it has
  • Issue: Claims about results are unsupported

    Fix: Show the numbers behind the result: from what to what, over what period, for whom. A result without a baseline cannot be judged and will not be quoted.

  • Partial: The guarantee is promised but not explained

    Fix: Tie the guarantee statement to distinct conditions: duration, scope, limitations, and the claims process.

    • Source document found: no
    • Structured warranty found: no
    • Explanation signals count: 1
  • Видимость источников отзывов

    • Reason: No visible or structured review/rating signals found
    • Visible reviews found: 0
  • Issue: Case studies carry no facts

    Fix: Write each case as task, approach and result, with numbers. A case that only names the client proves nothing an assistant can repeat.

  • Видимость сертификатов или лицензий

    • Reason: No certificate/license/accreditation claim found
    • Credential claims: 0
  • Issue: Too few links to proof outside the site

    Fix: Add links to independent sources: review cards, registries, publications, certificates, or external case corroboration.

    • Proof contexts found: yes
    • External proof links count: 0
    • Proof link types: none
  • Partial: Superlatives with nothing behind them

    Fix: Back a superlative with what makes it true — a ranking, an award, a measured figure — or drop it: an unproven "best" costs trust and gives an AI nothing to quote.

Сигналы доверия

46

8 checked · 3 passed · 3 issues

  • Issue: Contact details are insufficient

    Fix: Publish consistent contact details in at least two independent places: your contact page and structured data.

    • Corroborated values count: 2
    • Independent sources count: 4
    • Conflicting values: yes
  • Partial: Legal company information is incomplete

    Fix: Publish the legal company name and key registration details on a dedicated legal/company details page.

    • Legal page URL: none
    • Legal name found: yes
    • Identifier types: none
    • Text length: 0
  • Физический адрес или зона оказания услуг

    • Visible address: yes
    • Structured address: yes
    • Fields found: 5
  • Видимость экспертов или команды

    • Dedicated team page: yes
    • Usable Person count: 16
    • Usable ProfileBlock count: 6
    • Visible ProfileBlock count: 6
  • Issue: Authorship is missing in places

    Fix: State the author of your content and add a visible byline, profile link, or Person/author markup.

    • Editorial pages: 1
    • Attributed pages: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0
    • Source types: none
  • Политика конфиденциальности

    • Forms/data collection detected: yes
    • Text length: ≈27210
    • Linked site-wide: yes
  • Условия оказания услуг

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Issue: No reviews on the site

    Fix: Add visible customer reviews or testimonials, and only mark up reviews that genuinely appear on the page.

    • Visible reviews count: 0
    • Structured Review count: 0
    • AggregateRating found: no
    • Review pages: 0
  • Partial: Too few case studies

    Fix: Add case studies describing the task, approach, and result for your core services.

    • Case pages found: 4
    • Substantive cases: 0
    • Section groups: 0
    • Text length: ≈170
  • Актуальность обновления контента

    • Reason: Editorial pages exist but no reliable publish/modified date could be found
    • Editorial pages: 1
    • Pages with reliable date: 0
    • Newest date: unknown
    • Oldest date: unknown
    • Pages older than 730 days: 0
    • Date coverage percent: 0

Schema.org и JSON-LD

71

16 checked · 10 passed · 4 issues

  • Наличие JSON-LD

    • Pages scanned: 30
    • Pages with JSON-LD: 29
    • JSON-LD blocks found: 63
    • Homepage JSON-LD: yes
  • Partial: JSON-LD is broken

    • Total blocks: 63
    • Valid blocks: 62
    • Invalid blocks: 1
    • Pages with invalid JSON-LD: 1
  • Разметка Organization

  • Issue: No LocalBusiness markup

    Fix: Add a JSON-LD LocalBusiness (or a more specific subtype matching your actual business type, e.g. Restaurant, Store, Attorney) so AI systems can identify this as a physical/local business.

    • LocalBusiness type found: none
  • Issue: No WebSite markup

    Fix: Add a WebSite JSON-LD block (name and url, optionally a SearchAction) so AI systems can identify this as your site's canonical web presence.

    • WebSite type found: none
  • Partial: WebPage markup is missing or incomplete

    Fix: Add WebPage-level JSON-LD to your homepage too — it's currently only on a secondary page.

  • Issue: No BreadcrumbList markup

    Fix: Add BreadcrumbList JSON-LD to your deeper pages (e.g. /services/consulting) so AI systems can understand where each page sits in your site's structure.

    • Deep pages found: 7
    • BreadcrumbList pages found: 0
  • Разметка Service

  • Разметка Product / Offer

    • Product entities found: 0
    • Offer entities found: 51
    • Related pair found: yes
    • Price: ≈60000
  • Разметка FAQPage

  • Разметка Person

  • Разметка Review

    • Reason: No review signals (reviews/testimonials page match, or existing Review/AggregateRating/review property) detected on the scanned site
    • Review entities found: 0
  • Разметка AggregateRating

    • Reason: No review signals detected on the scanned site — nothing to aggregate a rating from
    • AggregateRating entities found: 0
  • Issue: No sameAs links in the markup

    Fix: Add sameAs links to your Organization (or LocalBusiness/Person) JSON-LD pointing to your official profiles (social media, Wikipedia, Crunchbase, etc.) and other authoritative external listings.

    • Valid sameAs count: 0
    • Invalid sameAs count: 0
  • Зона обслуживания (areaServed)

  • Почтовый адрес (PostalAddress)

    • Fields found: 5
  • Соответствие Schema видимому контенту

  • Риск спамной или вводящей в заблуждение разметки

Готовность AI Summary

38

9 checked · 1 passed · 4 issues

  • Partial: Homepage has no AI summary

    Fix: Add a compact company description near the main heading: what it does, who it serves, and what it offers.

    • Character count: ≈210
    • Sentence count: 2
    • Initial HTML region: no
    • Identity signal: yes
    • Activity signal: no
    • Context signal: yes
  • Partial: Service pages have no AI summary

    Fix: Add a short summary under the H1 of each service page: what the service is, its outcome, and who it's for.

    • Service pages evaluated: 10
    • Strong summaries: 0
    • Weak summaries: 10
    • Coverage percent: 0%
  • Блок ключевых фактов

    • Facts found: 4
    • Visible/structured-only: visible
  • Partial: "Why choose us" has no proof behind it

    Fix: Tie the \"why choose us\" block to concrete evidence: case studies, reviews, ratings, certificates, or measurable facts.

    • Proof types site-wide: 2
  • Issue: The «best for» block is missing in places

    Fix: Add a dedicated \"Who it's for\" or \"Best for\" block to the homepage and key offer pages.

    • Key offer pages: 9
    • Pages with best-for block: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
    • Heading: none
  • Issue: The «not for» block is missing in places

    Fix: For complex and custom offers, add a compact block covering limitations and applicability conditions.

    • Applicable offers: 10
    • Pages with not-for block: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
    • Heading: none
  • Краткие выжимки кейсов

    • Reason: No substantive case-study pages detected
    • Case pages evaluated: 0
  • Issue: Wording is too abstract

    Fix: Replace vague promises with checkable facts: what exactly you do, on what terms, with what result.

  • Issue: Too much empty filler text

    Fix: Remove sentences that carry no information — an AI answer built from them says nothing about you.

  • Partial: Paragraphs are hard to quote

    Fix: Write self-contained paragraphs an AI can quote as a complete answer: one thought, concrete facts, no dependence on the rest of the page.

Качество FAQ

50

9 checked · 2 passed · 3 issues

  • Наличие FAQ

    • Visible FAQ blocks: 15
    • Unique questions: 9
    • Pages with FAQ: 6
    • Dedicated FAQ pages: 0
  • Partial: Buying questions are not answered

    Fix: Add answers about pricing, timelines, ordering process, payment, or service availability.

    • Commercial topic groups found: 1
  • Issue: Objections are not answered

    Fix: Add answers to common objections: cancellation, refunds, guarantees, limitations, security, or support.

    • Objection topic groups found: 0
  • Покрытие локальных вопросов

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Issue: Comparison questions are not answered

    Fix: Add questions about the differences between services, plans, products, or solution options.

    • Comparison topic groups found: 0
  • Issue: "How to choose a provider" questions are not answered

    Fix: Add questions about choosing your company: experience, qualifications, work process, case studies, and support.

    • Vendor-selection topic groups found: 0
  • Конкретность ответов

    • FAQ pairs reviewed: 20
    • Share of specific answers: 85%
  • Partial: FAQ has no FAQPage markup

    Fix: Add FAQPage JSON-LD to every page where a question-and-answer block is visible to users.

    • Pages with visible FAQ: 6
    • Pages with FAQPage schema: 5
    • Coverage percent: 83
  • Partial: Questions are not worded the way clients ask them

    Fix: Phrase questions the way customers actually ask them out loud — that is the wording AI systems match against.

    • FAQ pairs reviewed: 20
    • Share of naturally phrased questions: 75%
  • Partial: FAQ contradicts the service pages

    Fix: Add questions and answers for every core service, and place them on the relevant pages.

    • Services detected: 10
    • Services covered: 3
    • Coverage percent: 30
    • Uncovered service: ≈22000
    • Uncovered service: ≈60000
    • Uncovered service: ≈70000

Готовность к AI-ответам

73

9 checked · 6 passed · 2 issues

  • Контент под рекомендательные запросы

  • Покрытие интента «лучший исполнитель для…»

  • Покрытие проблемных запросов

  • Покрытие локальных запросов

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Issue: There is almost no comparison of options

    Fix: Add a dedicated comparison of the options covering price, composition, outcome, limitations, and selection guidance.

    • Comparable group type: yes
    • Candidates: 0
    • Comparison page URL: none
    • Dimensions found: 0
    • Strong/weak: none
    • Heading: none
  • Страницы для этапа выбора

    • Offers evaluated: 10
    • Decision-stage pages: 10
    • Coverage percent: 100%
  • Понятные отличия от конкурентов

  • Честные ограничения

  • Partial: The next step is not obvious

    Fix: End local, comparison, and decision-stage pages with a specific next action.

    • Answer-oriented pages: 3
    • Pages with specific next step: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
    • CTA labels/headings: none
  • Issue: Content reads as template text

    Fix: Rewrite wording that would fit any company in any industry — name your own specifics instead.

Внешняя согласованность

60

1 checked · 0 passed · 0 issues

  • Видимость Google Business Profile

  • Согласованность названия бренда

  • Согласованность адреса

  • Согласованность телефона

  • Согласованность описания услуг

  • Видимость внешних отзывов

  • Внешние ссылки и цитирования

  • Partial: Too few links to official profiles

    Fix: Add links to the company's official profiles on the site and duplicate them in sameAs.

    • Visible official profiles: 1
    • Structured profiles: 0
    • Overlapping profiles: 0
  • Упоминания бренда

  • Риск противоречий

Коммерческое доверие

68

12 checked · 5 passed · 1 issues

  • Partial: The first screen does not say what is on offer

    Fix: Place the name or a clear heading, a specific offer, and the main target action near the start of the homepage.

    • Identity found: yes
    • Offer found: yes
    • Primary action found: no
    • CTA label: none
    • Method: initial HTML source region
  • Partial: The call to action is hard to find

    Fix: Add a specific action button near the start of the page: order, book, get a quote, or get started.

    • Primary CTA count: 9
    • Generic CTA count: 15
    • Initial-region CTA: none
    • Label: none
    • Target: none
  • Partial: Leaving a request is hard or impossible

    Fix: Add a short lead-capture form with a clear submit button and a field for the visitor's message.

    • Service-provider signal: yes
    • Quote/contact CTA: no
    • Lead form found: no
    • Contact page or channel: yes
  • Partial: Price and conditions are not visible

    Fix: State a price, a range, a starting-from price, or a clear custom-quote condition on the offer page.

    • Visible price/condition count: 46
    • Structured-only count: 41
  • Объяснение гарантий

    • Explanation signals count: 2
    • Structured warranty: no
  • Issue: No proof next to the call to action

    Fix: Place a review, rating, case study, or other verifiable proof near the primary action.

    • Proof type: none
    • Structurally near: no
    • Proof source URL: none
    • Proximity reason: not structurally near
  • Быстрый способ связи

    • Source URL count: 29
    • Visible phone/messenger count: ≈100
    • Phone (masked): *******4577
  • Юридические страницы

    • Data collection: yes
    • Transaction: no
    • Terms page/link: none
    • Linked near flow: yes
  • Partial: Hard to convert on a phone

    Fix: Fix what still does not fit a phone screen: fixed pixel widths, tables with many columns, an over-long form, a blocked zoom. The viewport is declared correctly — these are what is left.

    • Zooming is disabled: A reader who cannot enlarge a label cannot fill the form
  • Низкий уровень отвлекающих элементов

  • Блоки доверия рядом с точками конверсии

  • Partial: The next step is not obvious

    Fix: Use specific actions such as \"Get a quote\", \"Book now\", \"Order\", or \"Start a check\" instead of a vague \"Learn more\".

    • Key offer pages: 9
    • Pages with specific CTA: 1
    • Initial specific CTA: no
    • Generic CTA count: 15
    • Label: none

Want to know which of these problems your own site has? Run an AIRA check.

Similar examples

GEO Audit Example: property developer site, good readiness | AIRA