GEO audit of a media project — AI readiness 25/100

An anonymised report of a real site — media project. The address, the company name and any identifying quotes are hidden.

This audit in brief

An audit of a media project. The score is 25 out of 100; about 30 pages were read and 99% of the criteria evaluated.

The strongest area is “Trust Signals” — 49 out of 100.

The three weakest areas: External Consistency — 0/100, Schema.org / JSON-LD — 14/100, FAQ Quality — 17/100.

“External Consistency” is only partly prepared: some criteria pass, others do not.

The report at a glance

Strengths

  • Trust Signals49/100
  • Answer Readiness43/100
  • Proof Layer37/100

Main problems

  • External Consistency0/100
  • Schema.org / JSON-LD14/100
  • FAQ Quality17/100
  • Entity Clarity20/100
  • Service Structure22/100

Anonymised example report: media site. Addresses, names and quotes are hidden.

25of 100
Readiness for AI recommendations

~30 pages

criteria evaluated: 99%

criteria 3.3.0 · engine 1.28.0

Доступность для AI

10 checked · 10 passed · 0 issues

  • Главная страница возвращает HTTP 200

  • Финальный URL использует HTTPS

  • robots.txt присутствует

    • HTTP status: ≈200
  • XML sitemap присутствует

    • URLs indexed: ≈5000
  • OAI-SearchBot разрешён

  • Политика для GPTBot ясна

  • Googlebot разрешён

  • YandexBot разрешён

  • Нет глобального Disallow: /

    • Global block: None
  • HTML-контент доступен

Понятность компании как сущности

20

11 checked · 2 passed · 5 issues

  • Issue: Brand name is unclear

    Fix: Multiple conflicting company/brand names were found with no single dominant one. Standardize on one name across Organization/WebSite JSON-LD, Open Graph, and your pages.

  • Partial: Legal entity details are incomplete

    Fix: A legal/company name is visible, but no registration identifier (VAT/tax ID/company number, or ИНН/ОГРН) was found. Add one.

  • Issue: Business category is unclear

    Fix: State your business category consistently in Organization/Service/Product JSON-LD, the homepage title, and your company summary.

    • Category candidate: none
  • Partial: The «what we do» statement is unconvincing

    • Character count: 67
    • Subject signal: yes
    • Activity signal: yes
    • Structured corroboration: no
  • География оказания услуг

    • Reason: No local/geographic service signals (LocalBusiness, existing areaServed, or a service tied to a physical location) detected
    • areaServed found: no
  • Понятность целевой аудитории

  • Issue: About page says too little

    Fix: Add a substantive About page describing what you do, your history, your team, your legal details, and a link to contact.

    • About page found: no
  • Partial: Contact page is incomplete

    Fix: You have multiple contact channels but no dedicated contact page. Create one that lists them together.

    • Contact page URL: none
    • Contact form: no
    • Channels count: 3
  • Внешние профили sameAs

    • sameAs count: 0
    • Visible profiles count: 10
    • Overlapping profiles count: 0
  • Issue: Company details differ from page to page

    Fix: Use the same brand and legal name everywhere — in Schema.org, Open Graph, and your main pages.

  • Issue: A quotable company summary is missing

    Fix: Publish a company summary in your Organization JSON-LD: a "description" of at least 150 characters and two sentences that names the company, what it does and who or where it serves.

    • Summary source: none
  • Partial: Brand positioning is indistinct

    Fix: State what makes the company different in a way a reader could repeat: a named method, a measurable outcome, a specific focus.

Структура услуг

22

6 checked · 1 passed · 4 issues

  • Отдельная страница для каждой ключевой услуги

    • Reason: No service/business-provider signals detected
    • Core services detected: 0
  • Конкретное название услуги

    • Services detected: 10
    • Specific names: 10
    • Generic names: 0
    • Coverage percent: 100%
  • Partial: The result of the service is unclear

    Fix: For each service, state the concrete outcome: what the client gets after the work is complete.

    • Services evaluated: 10
    • Services with outcome: 3
    • Coverage percent: 30%
  • Issue: Not every service says who it is for

    Fix: Add a \"Who it's for\" block to service pages and list the client types or tasks the offer suits.

    • Services evaluated: 10
    • Services with target audience: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
  • Issue: Not every service says who it is not for

    Fix: For complex or custom services, state limitations, requirements, and cases where the service is not a fit.

    • Applicable services: 10
    • Services with limitations/non-fit: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
  • Issue: Price is not visible for every service

    Fix: For each service, state a price, price range, starting-from cost, or a clear custom-quote condition.

    • Services evaluated: 10
    • Visible price coverage: 0
    • Structured-only coverage: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
  • Понятные сроки оказания услуги

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Этапы работы

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Доказательства или кейсы по услуге

    • Reason: No reliable service candidates or service-provider signals detected
    • Services evaluated: 0
  • Issue: Not every service has its own FAQ

    Fix: Add service-specific questions and answers on each core service's own page.

    • Services evaluated: 10
    • Services with specific FAQ: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%

Слой доказательств

37

8 checked · 3 passed · 3 issues

  • Issue: Commercial claims are not backed up

    Fix: Put the evidence next to the claim: a figure, a named client, a date, a certificate, a link to the source. A claim a reader cannot check reads as advertising.

  • Проверка заявлений об опыте

    • Reason: The site makes no claims about its experience
  • Проверка заявлений о количестве клиентов

    • Reason: The site makes no claims about how many clients it has
  • Issue: Claims about results are unsupported

    Fix: Show the numbers behind the result: from what to what, over what period, for whom. A result without a baseline cannot be judged and will not be quoted.

  • Partial: The guarantee is promised but not explained

    Fix: Tie the guarantee statement to distinct conditions: duration, scope, limitations, and the claims process.

    • Source document found: no
    • Structured warranty found: no
    • Explanation signals count: 1
  • Partial: Reviews do not show where they came from

    Fix: Show the number of reviews and state where they come from: your own database, a company profile, or an independent platform.

    • Visible reviews found: 0
    • Structured reviews found: no
    • Review count: none
    • Review platform/source found: yes
  • Issue: Case studies carry no facts

    Fix: Write each case as task, approach and result, with numbers. A case that only names the client proves nothing an assistant can repeat.

  • Видимость сертификатов или лицензий

    • Credential claims: yes
    • Visible assets: 8
    • Document links: 8
  • Внешние ссылки на доказательства

    • Proof contexts found: yes
    • External proof links count: 14
  • Неподтверждённые превосходные заявления

Сигналы доверия

49

3 checked · 1 passed · 2 issues

  • Реальные контактные данные

    • Corroborated values count: 1
    • Independent sources count: 2
    • Conflicting values: no
  • Issue: Legal company information is incomplete

    Fix: Publish the legal company name and key registration details on a dedicated legal/company details page.

    • Legal page URL: none
    • Legal name found: no
    • Identifier types: none
    • Text length: 0
  • Физический адрес или зона оказания услуг

    • Reason: No local-business/physical-location signals detected
    • Visible address: no
  • Видимость экспертов или команды

    • Reason: No service-provider/expert-business signals detected
    • Usable Person count: 0
  • Указание авторов или экспертов

    • Reason: No editorial content pages detected
    • Editorial pages: 0
  • Политика конфиденциальности

    • Reason: No data-collection forms detected
    • Forms/data collection detected: no
  • Условия оказания услуг

    • Reason: No order/payment/booking/contract signals detected
    • Transaction signals: none
  • Issue: No reviews on the site

    Fix: Add visible customer reviews or testimonials, and only mark up reviews that genuinely appear on the page.

    • Visible reviews count: 0
    • Structured Review count: 0
    • AggregateRating found: no
    • Review pages: 0
  • Кейсы

    • Reason: No service-provider/business signals detected
    • Case pages found: 0
  • Актуальность обновления контента

    • Reason: Editorial pages exist but no reliable publish/modified date could be found
    • Editorial pages: 0
    • Pages with reliable date: 0
    • Newest date: unknown
    • Oldest date: unknown
    • Pages older than 730 days: 0
    • Date coverage percent: 0

Schema.org и JSON-LD

14

7 checked · 1 passed · 6 issues

  • Наличие JSON-LD

    • Pages scanned: 30
    • Pages with JSON-LD: 30
    • JSON-LD blocks found: 30
    • Homepage JSON-LD: yes
  • Issue: JSON-LD is broken

    Fix: None of the JSON-LD blocks on this site parse as valid JSON. Validate each block with a JSON linter or Google's Rich Results Test and republish.

    • Total blocks: 30
    • Valid blocks: 0
    • Invalid blocks: 30
    • Pages with invalid JSON-LD: 30
  • Issue: Organization markup is missing or incomplete

    Fix: Add an Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD block with your company's name, url, logo and contact details so AI systems can identify who is behind this site.

    • Organization type found: none
  • Разметка LocalBusiness

    • Reason: No strong local-business signals (address plus phone/hours/geo/map/branch/pricing, or an address on a contact/location page) detected on the scanned site
    • LocalBusiness type found: none
  • Issue: No WebSite markup

    Fix: Add a WebSite JSON-LD block (name and url, optionally a SearchAction) so AI systems can identify this as your site's canonical web presence.

    • WebSite type found: none
  • Issue: WebPage markup is missing or incomplete

    Fix: Add a WebPage JSON-LD entity (or a more specific subtype like AboutPage/ContactPage/FAQPage) to your pages so AI systems can understand what each page represents.

    • WebPage type found: none
  • Issue: No BreadcrumbList markup

    Fix: Add BreadcrumbList JSON-LD to your deeper pages (e.g. /services/consulting) so AI systems can understand where each page sits in your site's structure.

    • Deep pages found: 28
    • BreadcrumbList pages found: 0
  • Разметка Service

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Разметка Product / Offer

    • Reason: No product/catalog signals detected on the scanned site
    • Product entities found: 0
    • Offer entities found: 0
  • Issue: No FAQPage markup

    Fix: Mark up your existing FAQ section with FAQPage JSON-LD (Question/Answer pairs) so AI systems can surface your answers directly.

    • FAQ blocks found: 8
    • FAQPage schema pages: 0
  • Разметка Person

    • Reason: No author/team signals (team/author-page match, Microdata Person, or author/creator/employee/founder/member property) detected on the scanned site
    • Person type found: none
  • Разметка Review

    • Reason: No review signals (reviews/testimonials page match, or existing Review/AggregateRating/review property) detected on the scanned site
    • Review entities found: 0
  • Разметка AggregateRating

    • Reason: No review signals detected on the scanned site — nothing to aggregate a rating from
    • AggregateRating entities found: 0
  • Ссылки sameAs

    • Reason: No Organization, LocalBusiness, or Person entity found on the scanned site
    • sameAs values found: 0
  • Зона обслуживания (areaServed)

    • Reason: No geography signal (LocalBusiness, existing areaServed, or Service paired with an address/place) detected on the scanned site
    • areaServed found: no
  • Почтовый адрес (PostalAddress)

    • Reason: No local-business or address signals detected on the scanned site
    • Fields found: 0
  • Соответствие Schema видимому контенту

    • Reason: The site carries no valid JSON-LD to compare with its pages
  • Риск спамной или вводящей в заблуждение разметки

    • Reason: The site carries no valid JSON-LD to compare with its pages

Готовность AI Summary

24

9 checked · 2 passed · 3 issues

  • Partial: Homepage has no AI summary

    Fix: Add a compact company description near the main heading: what it does, who it serves, and what it offers.

    • Character count: 66
    • Sentence count: 1
    • Initial HTML region: no
    • Identity signal: no
    • Activity signal: no
    • Context signal: yes
  • AI Summary на страницах услуг

    • Reason: No dedicated service pages detected
    • Service pages evaluated: 0
  • Блок ключевых фактов

    • Facts found: 6
    • Fact types: none
    • Heading: none
    • Visible/structured-only: visible
  • Partial: "Why choose us" has no proof behind it

    Fix: Tie the \"why choose us\" block to concrete evidence: case studies, reviews, ratings, certificates, or measurable facts.

    • Why-choose section URL: none
    • Heading: none
    • Proof types near: none
    • Proof types site-wide: 4
  • Issue: The «best for» block is missing in places

    Fix: Add a dedicated \"Who it's for\" or \"Best for\" block to the homepage and key offer pages.

    • Key offer pages: 1
    • Pages with best-for block: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
    • Heading: none
  • Issue: The «not for» block is missing in places

    Fix: For complex and custom offers, add a compact block covering limitations and applicability conditions.

    • Applicable offers: 10
    • Pages with not-for block: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
    • Heading: none
  • Partial: Cases have no short summaries

    Fix: Add a brief block at the start of each case study: challenge, solution, result, and key metrics.

    • Case pages evaluated: 2
    • Cases with summary: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
    • Component types: none
  • Partial: Wording is too abstract

    Fix: Replace vague promises with checkable facts: what exactly you do, on what terms, with what result.

  • Низкий уровень пустых фраз

    • Text blocks reviewed: 40
  • Issue: Paragraphs are hard to quote

    Fix: Write self-contained paragraphs an AI can quote as a complete answer: one thought, concrete facts, no dependence on the rest of the page.

Качество FAQ

17

6 checked · 1 passed · 5 issues

  • Наличие FAQ

    • Visible FAQ blocks: 8
    • Unique questions: 8
    • Pages with FAQ: 1
    • Dedicated FAQ pages: 0
  • Issue: Buying questions are not answered

    Fix: Add answers about pricing, timelines, ordering process, payment, or service availability.

    • Commercial topic groups found: 0
  • Issue: Objections are not answered

    Fix: Add answers to common objections: cancellation, refunds, guarantees, limitations, security, or support.

    • Objection topic groups found: 0
  • Покрытие локальных вопросов

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Покрытие сравнительных вопросов

    • Reason: Only one offering was found — nothing objective to compare
    • Comparison question found: no
  • Вопросы выбора подрядчика или поставщика

    • Reason: The site does not show service/solution provider signals
    • Vendor-selection topic groups found: 0
  • Issue: FAQ answers are too vague

    Fix: Answer FAQ questions with terms, numbers and steps instead of restating the question or promising to discuss it individually.

    • FAQ pairs reviewed: 8
    • Share of specific answers: 25%
  • Issue: FAQ has no FAQPage markup

    Fix: Add FAQPage JSON-LD to every page where a question-and-answer block is visible to users.

    • Pages with visible FAQ: 1
    • Pages with FAQPage schema: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0
  • Issue: Questions are not worded the way clients ask them

    Fix: Phrase questions the way customers actually ask them out loud — that is the wording AI systems match against.

    • FAQ pairs reviewed: 8
    • Share of naturally phrased questions: 13%
  • Согласованность со страницами услуг

    • Reason: No reliable service/product candidates were found
    • Services detected: 0

Готовность к AI-ответам

43

9 checked · 4 passed · 2 issues

  • Issue: Nothing written for recommendation-style questions

    Fix: Write content an assistant could recommend you from: who you are for, what you do, on what terms.

  • Покрытие интента «лучший исполнитель для…»

  • Покрытие проблемных запросов

  • Покрытие локальных запросов

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Partial: There is almost no comparison of options

    Fix: Add a dedicated comparison of the options covering price, composition, outcome, limitations, and selection guidance.

    • Comparable group type: yes
    • Candidates: 0
    • Dimensions found: 0
    • Strong/weak: weak
  • Partial: Too few pages for a reader who is choosing

    Fix: Prepare decision-stage pages for core offers with terms, price, proof, FAQ, and a specific action.

    • Offers evaluated: 10
    • Decision-stage pages: 4
    • Coverage percent: 40%
  • Partial: It is not clear how this differs from competitors

    Fix: Name differences a reader can check — numbers, named methods, specific guarantees — instead of general claims.

  • Issue: Limitations are not admitted anywhere

    Fix: Say plainly what you do not do and whom you do not suit — an honest limit is a strong trust signal for both people and AI.

  • Понятный следующий шаг

    • Answer-oriented pages: 3
    • Pages with specific next step: 3
    • Coverage percent: 100%
  • Не шаблонный контент

Внешняя согласованность

0

1 checked · 0 passed · 1 issues

  • Видимость Google Business Profile

  • Согласованность названия бренда

  • Согласованность адреса

  • Согласованность телефона

  • Согласованность описания услуг

  • Видимость внешних отзывов

  • Внешние ссылки и цитирования

  • Issue: Too few links to official profiles

    Fix: Add links to the company's official profiles on the site and duplicate them in sameAs.

    • Visible official profiles: 0
    • Structured profiles: 0
    • Overlapping profiles: 0
    • Platforms: none
  • Упоминания бренда

  • Риск противоречий

Коммерческое доверие

31

8 checked · 1 passed · 0 issues

  • Partial: The first screen does not say what is on offer

    Fix: Place the name or a clear heading, a specific offer, and the main target action near the start of the homepage.

    • Identity found: yes
    • Offer found: yes
    • Primary action found: no
    • H1: none
    • CTA label: none
    • Method: initial HTML source region
  • Partial: The call to action is hard to find

    Fix: Add a specific action button near the start of the page: order, book, get a quote, or get started.

    • Primary CTA count: 31
    • Generic CTA count: 1
    • Initial-region CTA: none
    • Label: none
    • Target: none
  • Наличие формы заявки

    • Reason: No service-provider/lead-generation signals detected
    • Lead form found: n/a
  • Видимость цены или условий

    • Reason: No offering/commercial signals detected
    • Visible price/condition count: 0
  • Partial: The guarantee is not explained

    Fix: If you make a guarantee or refund claim, state its duration, conditions, limitations, and how to request it.

    • Explanation signals count: 1
    • Structured warranty: no
  • Partial: No proof next to the call to action

    Fix: Place a review, rating, case study, or other verifiable proof near the primary action.

    • Structurally near: no
    • Proximity reason: not structurally near
  • Быстрый способ связи

    • Reason: No provider/contact-oriented signals detected
    • Fast contact types: n/a
  • Юридические страницы

    • Reason: No data collection and no transaction signals detected
    • Privacy page/link: n/a
  • Partial: Hard to convert on a phone

    Fix: Fix what still does not fit a phone screen: fixed pixel widths, tables with many columns, an over-long form, a blocked zoom. The viewport is declared correctly — these are what is left.

    • Tables too wide for a phone screen: 1
  • Низкий уровень отвлекающих элементов

  • Partial: No trust signals where the decision is made

    Fix: Add trust signals near the form or button: reviews, contacts, guarantees, company details, or terms.

    • Trust types near: none
  • Partial: The next step is not obvious

    Fix: Use specific actions such as \"Get a quote\", \"Book now\", \"Order\", or \"Start a check\" instead of a vague \"Learn more\".

    • Key offer pages: 0
    • Pages with specific CTA: 0
    • Initial specific CTA: no
    • Generic CTA count: 1
    • Label: none

Want to know which of these problems your own site has? Run an AIRA check.

Similar examples

GEO Audit Example: media project, minimal groundwork | AIRA