GEO audit of a service company site — AI readiness 41/100
An anonymised report of a real site — service company site. The address, the company name and any identifying quotes are hidden.
This audit in brief
This is an audit of a service company site scoring 41 out of 100. The crawl read about 30 pages; 100% of the applicable criteria reached a verdict.
The strongest area is “AI Access & Crawlability” — 100 out of 100.
The three weakest areas: External Consistency — 0/100, Proof Layer — 10/100, FAQ Quality — 19/100.
“External Consistency” is only partly prepared: some criteria pass, others do not.
The report at a glance
Strengths
- AI Access & Crawlability100/100
- Conversion Trust92/100
- Schema.org / JSON-LD60/100
Main problems
- External Consistency0/100
- Proof Layer10/100
- FAQ Quality19/100
- Service Structure22/100
- Entity Clarity33/100
This example was updated after a re-check (2026-09).
Anonymised example report: services site. Addresses, names and quotes are hidden.
~30 pages
criteria evaluated: 100%
criteria 3.9.0 · engine 1.43.0
Доступность для AI
10016 checked · 15 passed · 1 issues
Главная страница возвращает HTTP 200
Финальный URL использует HTTPS
robots.txt присутствует
- HTTP status: ≈200
XML sitemap присутствует
- URLs indexed: 93
OAI-SearchBot разрешён
Политика для GPTBot ясна
Googlebot разрешён
YandexBot разрешён
Нет глобального Disallow: /
- Global block: None
HTML-контент доступен
Страницы, закрытые от индексации
- Homepage closed to indexing: no
- Pages closed to indexing: 0
- Share of read pages: 0%
Фавиконка присутствует
- HTTP status: ≈200
Несуществующие страницы отвечают 404
- HTTP status: ≈400
Язык и кодировка объявлены
Canonical главной корректен
Issue: Root redirects diverge or loop
Fix: Redirect every spelling of the site root (http, www) to the one canonical address — a divergent variant is a second site competing for the same identity
Понятность компании как сущности
3312 checked · 5 passed · 4 issues
Ясность названия бренда
Видимость юридического лица
- Identifier value: ******5159
Понятность категории бизнеса
Чёткое описание «что мы делаем»
- Character count: ≈150
- Subject signal: yes
- Activity signal: yes
- Structured corroboration: yes
География оказания услуг
Issue: Target audience is unclear
Fix: Add a dedicated \"Who it's for\" section and explicitly list the types of customers, companies, or users the offering fits.
- Audience source: none
Partial: About page says too little
Fix: Expand your About page with more substance (at least a few short paragraphs) and add supporting details — company name, description, legal info, team, history/mission, and a contact link.
- Text length: ≈2420
- Supporting signals count: 2
Partial: Contact page is incomplete
Fix: You have multiple contact channels but no dedicated contact page. Create one that lists them together.
- Contact page URL: none
- Contact form: no
- Channels count: 3
Issue: sameAs profiles are incomplete
Fix: Add sameAs links to your official company profiles and duplicate those links visibly on the site.
- sameAs count: 0
- Visible profiles count: 0
- Overlapping profiles count: 0
Issue: Company details differ from page to page
Fix: Use the same brand and legal name everywhere — in Schema.org, Open Graph, and your main pages.
Issue: A quotable company summary is missing
Fix: Publish a company summary in your Organization JSON-LD: a "description" of at least 150 characters and two sentences that names the company, what it does and who or where it serves.
- Summary source: none
Partial: Brand positioning is indistinct
Fix: State what makes the company different in a way a reader could repeat: a named method, a measurable outcome, a specific focus.
Структура услуг
225 checked · 1 passed · 3 issues
Отдельная страница для каждой ключевой услуги
- Reason: No service/business-provider signals detected
- Core services detected: 0
Конкретное название услуги
- Services detected: 10
- Specific names: 10
- Generic names: 0
- Coverage percent: 100%
Partial: The result of the service is unclear
Fix: For each service, state the concrete outcome: what the client gets after the work is complete.
- Services evaluated: 10
- Services with outcome: 1
- Coverage percent: 10%
Issue: Not every service says who it is for
Fix: Add a \"Who it's for\" block to service pages and list the client types or tasks the offer suits.
- Services evaluated: 10
- Services with target audience: 0
- Coverage percent: 0%
Кому услуга не подходит
- Reason: No project/custom-delivery service candidates detected
- Applicable services: 0
Issue: Price is not visible for every service
Fix: For each service, state a price, price range, starting-from cost, or a clear custom-quote condition.
- Services evaluated: 10
- Visible price coverage: 0
- Structured-only coverage: 0
- Coverage percent: 0%
Понятные сроки оказания услуги
- Reason: No project/custom-delivery service candidates detected
- Applicable services: 0
Этапы работы
- Reason: No project/custom-delivery service candidates detected
- Applicable services: 0
Доказательства или кейсы по услуге
- Reason: No reliable service candidates or service-provider signals detected
- Services evaluated: 0
Issue: Not every service has its own FAQ
Fix: Add service-specific questions and answers on each core service's own page.
- Services evaluated: 10
- Services with specific FAQ: 0
- Coverage percent: 0%
Слой доказательств
106 checked · 1 passed · 3 issues
Partial: Commercial claims are not backed up
Fix: Put the evidence next to the claim: a figure, a named client, a date, a certificate, a link to the source. A claim a reader cannot check reads as advertising.
Issue: Claims about experience are unsupported
Fix: Show what the experience consists of: since when, how many projects, in which industries. "Years on the market" without content is not experience, it is age.
Проверка заявлений о количестве клиентов
- Reason: The site makes no claims about how many clients it has
Issue: Claims about results are unsupported
Fix: Show the numbers behind the result: from what to what, over what period, for whom. A result without a baseline cannot be judged and will not be quoted.
Partial: The guarantee is promised but not explained
Fix: Tie the guarantee statement to distinct conditions: duration, scope, limitations, and the claims process.
- Source document found: no
- Structured warranty found: no
- Explanation signals count: 1
Видимость источников отзывов
- Reason: No visible or structured review/rating signals found
- Visible reviews found: 0
Фактическая глубина кейсов
- Reason: No case studies were found to read
Видимость сертификатов или лицензий
- Reason: No certificate/license/accreditation claim found
- Credential claims: 0
Issue: Too few links to proof outside the site
Fix: Add links to independent sources: review cards, registries, publications, certificates, or external case corroboration.
- Proof contexts found: yes
- External proof links count: 0
- Proof link types: none
Неподтверждённые превосходные заявления
Сигналы доверия
514 checked · 2 passed · 1 issues
Реальные контактные данные
- Corroborated values count: 2
- Independent sources count: 4
- Conflicting values: no
Partial: Legal company information is incomplete
Fix: Publish the legal company name and key registration details on a dedicated legal/company details page.
- Legal page URL: none
- Legal name found: yes
- Text length: 0
Физический адрес или зона оказания услуг
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Видимость экспертов или команды
- Reason: No service-provider/expert-business signals detected
- Usable Person count: 0
Указание авторов или экспертов
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Политика конфиденциальности
- Forms/data collection detected: yes
- Text length: ≈1450
- Linked site-wide: yes
Условия оказания услуг
- Reason: No order/payment/booking/contract signals detected
- Transaction signals: none
Issue: No reviews on the site
Fix: Add visible customer reviews or testimonials, and only mark up reviews that genuinely appear on the page.
- Visible reviews count: 0
- Structured Review count: 0
- AggregateRating found: no
- Review pages: 0
Кейсы
- Reason: No service-provider/business signals detected
- Case pages found: 0
Актуальность обновления контента
- Reason: No editorial/content pages or date signals detected
- Editorial pages: 0
Schema.org и JSON-LD
6011 checked · 7 passed · 4 issues
Наличие JSON-LD
- Pages scanned: 30
- Pages with JSON-LD: 30
- JSON-LD blocks found: 30
- Homepage JSON-LD: yes
Валидация JSON-LD
- Total blocks: 30
- Valid blocks: 30
- Invalid blocks: 0
- Pages with invalid JSON-LD: 0
Разметка Organization
Разметка LocalBusiness
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Разметка WebSite
Issue: WebPage markup is missing or incomplete
Fix: Add a WebPage JSON-LD entity (or a more specific subtype like AboutPage/ContactPage/FAQPage) to your pages so AI systems can understand what each page represents.
- WebPage type found: none
Issue: No BreadcrumbList markup
Fix: Add BreadcrumbList JSON-LD to your deeper pages (e.g. /services/consulting) so AI systems can understand where each page sits in your site's structure.
- Deep pages found: 26
- BreadcrumbList pages found: 0
Разметка Service
- Reason: No service signals (service-page URL/heading match, Microdata Service, or offer catalog) detected on the scanned site
- Service type found: none
Разметка Product / Offer
- Reason: No product/catalog signals detected on the scanned site
- Product entities found: 0
- Offer entities found: 0
Issue: No FAQPage markup
Fix: Mark up your existing FAQ section with FAQPage JSON-LD (Question/Answer pairs) so AI systems can surface your answers directly.
- FAQ blocks found: 2
- FAQPage schema pages: 0
Разметка Person
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Разметка Review
- Reason: No review signals (reviews/testimonials page match, or existing Review/AggregateRating/review property) detected on the scanned site
- Review entities found: 0
Разметка AggregateRating
- Reason: No review signals detected on the scanned site — nothing to aggregate a rating from
- AggregateRating entities found: 0
Issue: No sameAs links in the markup
Fix: Add sameAs links to your Organization (or LocalBusiness/Person) JSON-LD pointing to your official profiles (social media, Wikipedia, Crunchbase, etc.) and other authoritative external listings.
- Valid sameAs count: 0
- Invalid sameAs count: 0
Зона обслуживания (areaServed)
Почтовый адрес (PostalAddress)
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Соответствие Schema видимому контенту
Риск спамной или вводящей в заблуждение разметки
Готовность AI Summary
408 checked · 2 passed · 2 issues
Partial: Homepage has no AI summary
Fix: Add a compact company description near the main heading: what it does, who it serves, and what it offers.
- Character count: 54
- Sentence count: 1
- Initial HTML region: no
- Identity signal: no
- Activity signal: no
- Context signal: yes
AI Summary на страницах услуг
- Service pages evaluated: 10
- Strong summaries: 8
- Weak summaries: 2
- Coverage percent: 80%
Partial: The key-facts block is missing or thin
Fix: Add a compact key-facts block: price, timeline, format, geography, audience, and key terms.
- Facts found: 10
- Fact types: none
- Heading: none
- Visible/structured-only: structured-only
Issue: "Why choose us" has no proof behind it
Fix: Tie the \"why choose us\" block to concrete evidence: case studies, reviews, ratings, certificates, or measurable facts.
- Why-choose section URL: none
- Heading: none
- Proof types near: none
- Proof types site-wide: 1
Issue: The «best for» block is missing in places
Fix: Add a dedicated \"Who it's for\" or \"Best for\" block to the homepage and key offer pages.
- Key offer pages: 27
- Pages with best-for block: 0
- Coverage percent: 0%
- Heading: none
Блок ограничений
- Reason: No project/custom/complex offer candidates detected
- Applicable offers: 0
Краткие выжимки кейсов
- Reason: No substantive case-study pages detected
- Case pages evaluated: 0
Partial: Wording is too abstract
Fix: Replace vague promises with checkable facts: what exactly you do, on what terms, with what result.
Partial: Too much empty filler text
Fix: Remove sentences that carry no information — an AI answer built from them says nothing about you.
Абзацы, которые легко цитировать
- Quotable paragraphs found: 4
Качество FAQ
197 checked · 1 passed · 5 issues
Partial: No FAQ on the site
Fix: Add a question-and-answer block on a dedicated FAQ page or on key service pages.
- Visible FAQ blocks: 2
- Unique questions: 2
- Pages with FAQ: 1
- Dedicated FAQ pages: 0
Issue: Buying questions are not answered
Fix: Add answers about pricing, timelines, ordering process, payment, or service availability.
- Commercial topic groups found: 0
Issue: Objections are not answered
Fix: Add answers to common objections: cancellation, refunds, guarantees, limitations, security, or support.
- Objection topic groups found: 0
Issue: Local questions are not answered
Fix: Add questions about service area, address, directions, parking, or local delivery.
- Local topic groups found: 0
Покрытие сравнительных вопросов
- Reason: Only one offering was found — nothing objective to compare
- Comparison question found: no
Вопросы выбора подрядчика или поставщика
- Reason: The site does not show service/solution provider signals
- Vendor-selection topic groups found: 0
Конкретность ответов
- FAQ pairs reviewed: 2
- Share of specific answers: 100%
Issue: FAQ has no FAQPage markup
Fix: Add FAQPage JSON-LD to every page where a question-and-answer block is visible to users.
- Pages with visible FAQ: 1
- Pages with FAQPage schema: 0
- Coverage percent: 0
Issue: Questions are not worded the way clients ask them
Fix: Phrase questions the way customers actually ask them out loud — that is the wording AI systems match against.
- FAQ pairs reviewed: 2
- Share of naturally phrased questions: 0%
Согласованность со страницами услуг
- Reason: No reliable service/product candidates were found
- Services detected: 0
Готовность к AI-ответам
3510 checked · 4 passed · 4 issues
Контент под рекомендательные запросы
Покрытие интента «лучший исполнитель для…»
Issue: Problem-driven questions are not covered
Fix: Describe the problem the customer starts from, in their own words — not only the service you sell.
Issue: Local questions are not covered
Fix: Tie core services to service-area regions on the relevant pages and in areaServed.
- Geographic offers: 10
- Offers with local coverage: 0
- Coverage percent: 0%
- Geography signals: none
Issue: There is almost no comparison of options
Fix: Add a dedicated comparison of the options covering price, composition, outcome, limitations, and selection guidance.
- Comparable group type: yes
- Candidates: 0
- Comparison page URL: none
- Dimensions found: 0
- Strong/weak: none
- Heading: none
Partial: Too few pages for a reader who is choosing
Fix: Prepare decision-stage pages for core offers with terms, price, proof, FAQ, and a specific action.
- Offers evaluated: 10
- Decision-stage pages: 5
- Coverage percent: 50%
Partial: It is not clear how this differs from competitors
Fix: Name differences a reader can check — numbers, named methods, specific guarantees — instead of general claims.
Issue: Limitations are not admitted anywhere
Fix: Say plainly what you do not do and whom you do not suit — an honest limit is a strong trust signal for both people and AI.
Понятный следующий шаг
- Answer-oriented pages: 5
- Pages with specific next step: 5
- Coverage percent: 100%
Не шаблонный контент
Внешняя согласованность
01 checked · 0 passed · 1 issues
Видимость Google Business Profile
Согласованность названия бренда
Согласованность адреса
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Согласованность телефона
Согласованность описания услуг
Видимость внешних отзывов
Внешние ссылки и цитирования
Issue: Too few links to official profiles
Fix: Add links to the company's official profiles on the site and duplicate them in sameAs.
- Visible official profiles: 0
- Structured profiles: 0
- Overlapping profiles: 0
- Platforms: none
Упоминания бренда
Риск противоречий
Коммерческое доверие
9211 checked · 5 passed · 2 issues
Понятность оффера на первом экране
- Identity found: yes
- Offer found: yes
- Primary action found: yes
- Method: initial HTML source region
Видимость CTA
- Primary CTA count: 90
- Generic CTA count: ≈110
- Initial-region CTA: primary
Partial: Leaving a request is hard or impossible
Fix: Add a short lead-capture form with a clear submit button and a field for the visitor's message.
- Service-provider signal: no
- Quote/contact CTA: no
- Lead form found: no
- Contact page or channel: yes
Issue: Price and conditions are not visible
Fix: State a price, a range, a starting-from price, or a clear custom-quote condition on the offer page.
- Visible price/condition count: 2
- Structured-only count: 0
Partial: The guarantee is not explained
Fix: If you make a guarantee or refund claim, state its duration, conditions, limitations, and how to request it.
- Explanation signals count: 1
- Structured warranty: no
Issue: No proof next to the call to action
Fix: Place a review, rating, case study, or other verifiable proof near the primary action.
- Proof type: none
- Structurally near: no
- Proof source URL: none
- Proximity reason: not structurally near
Быстрый способ связи
- Reason: No provider/contact-oriented signals detected
- Fast contact types: n/a
Partial: Legal pages are missing
Fix: Add links to the privacy policy and terms near forms, checkout, or payment.
- Data collection: yes
- Transaction: no
- Terms page/link: none
- Linked near flow: no
Мобильная готовность к конверсии
- Viewport adapts to the device: The page declares itself usable on a phone
Низкий уровень отвлекающих элементов
Partial: No trust signals where the decision is made
Fix: Add trust signals near the form or button: reviews, contacts, guarantees, company details, or terms.
Понятный следующий шаг
- Key offer pages: 27
- Pages with specific CTA: 27
- Initial specific CTA: yes
- Generic CTA count: ≈110
Want to know which of these problems your own site has? Run an AIRA check.