GEO audit of a SaaS product — AI readiness 41/100

An anonymised report of a real site — SaaS product. The address, the company name and any identifying quotes are hidden.

This audit in brief

This is an audit of a SaaS product scoring 41 out of 100. The crawl read about 30 pages; 99% of the applicable criteria reached a verdict.

The strongest area is “AI Access & Crawlability” — 100 out of 100.

The three weakest areas: Schema.org / JSON-LD — 0/100, Trust Signals — 9/100, AI Summary Readiness — 28/100.

“Schema.org / JSON-LD” is only partly prepared: some criteria pass, others do not.

The report at a glance

Strengths

  • AI Access & Crawlability100/100
  • External Consistency100/100
  • Conversion Trust97/100

Main problems

  • Schema.org / JSON-LD0/100
  • Trust Signals9/100
  • AI Summary Readiness28/100
  • Entity Clarity33/100
  • Service Structure54/100

Anonymised example report: SaaS product. Addresses, names and quotes are hidden.

41of 100
Readiness for AI recommendations

~30 pages

criteria evaluated: 99%

criteria 3.8.0 · engine 1.34.0

Доступность для AI

100

11 checked · 11 passed · 0 issues

  • Главная страница возвращает HTTP 200

  • Финальный URL использует HTTPS

  • robots.txt присутствует

    • HTTP status: ≈200
  • XML sitemap присутствует

    • URLs indexed: ≈490
  • OAI-SearchBot разрешён

  • Политика для GPTBot ясна

  • Googlebot разрешён

  • YandexBot разрешён

  • Нет глобального Disallow: /

    • Global block: None
  • HTML-контент доступен

  • Страницы, закрытые от индексации

    • Homepage closed to indexing: no
    • Pages closed to indexing: 0
    • Share of read pages: 0%

Понятность компании как сущности

33

10 checked · 5 passed · 2 issues

  • Partial: Brand name is unclear

    Fix: Only one source confirms this name. Add it to a second independent source (e.g. WebSite JSON-LD or Open Graph og:site_name) to remove ambiguity.

  • Видимость юридического лица

    • Identifier value: ******3039
  • Понятность категории бизнеса

  • Partial: The «what we do» statement is unconvincing

    • Character count: ≈130
    • Subject signal: yes
    • Activity signal: yes
    • Structured corroboration: no
  • География оказания услуг

    • Reason: No local/geographic service signals (LocalBusiness, existing areaServed, or a service tied to a physical location) detected
    • areaServed found: no
  • Понятность целевой аудитории

  • Issue: About page says too little

    Fix: Add a substantive About page describing what you do, your history, your team, your legal details, and a link to contact.

    • About page found: no
  • Полнота страницы контактов

    • Contact form: yes
    • Channels count: 5
  • Внешние профили sameAs

    • sameAs count: 0
    • Visible profiles count: 2
    • Overlapping profiles count: 0
  • Согласованность сущности на страницах

    • Reason: Fewer than two independent strong name sources were found across the scanned pages
    • Independent sources: 1
  • Issue: A quotable company summary is missing

    Fix: Publish a company summary in your Organization JSON-LD: a "description" of at least 150 characters and two sentences that names the company, what it does and who or where it serves.

    • Summary source: none
  • Partial: Brand positioning is indistinct

    Fix: State what makes the company different in a way a reader could repeat: a named method, a measurable outcome, a specific focus.

Структура услуг

54

8 checked · 4 passed · 3 issues

  • Отдельная страница для каждой ключевой услуги

    • Reason: No service/business-provider signals detected
    • Core services detected: 0
  • Конкретное название услуги

    • Services detected: 3
    • Specific names: 3
    • Generic names: 0
    • Coverage percent: 100%
  • Понятный результат услуги

    • Services evaluated: 3
    • Services with outcome: 3
    • Coverage percent: 100%
  • Partial: Not every service says who it is for

    Fix: Add a \"Who it's for\" block to service pages and list the client types or tasks the offer suits.

    • Services evaluated: 3
    • Services with target audience: 1
    • Coverage percent: 33%
  • Issue: Not every service says who it is not for

    Fix: For complex or custom services, state limitations, requirements, and cases where the service is not a fit.

    • Applicable services: 3
    • Services with limitations/non-fit: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
  • Наличие цены или диапазона цены

    • Services evaluated: 3
    • Visible price coverage: 3
    • Structured-only coverage: 0
    • Coverage percent: 100%
  • Issue: Timelines are missing for some services

    Fix: State an approximate timeline or duration range for project and custom-delivery services.

    • Applicable services: 3
    • Services with timeline: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
  • Issue: Process steps are missing for some services

    Fix: Describe the service delivery process in at least three sequential steps.

    • Applicable services: 3
    • Services with process: 0
    • Steps count: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
  • Доказательства или кейсы по услуге

    • Reason: No reliable service candidates or service-provider signals detected
    • Services evaluated: 0
  • FAQ по конкретной услуге

    • Services evaluated: 3
    • Services with specific FAQ: 3
    • Coverage percent: 100%

Слой доказательств

69

6 checked · 4 passed · 0 issues

  • Partial: Commercial claims are not backed up

    Fix: Put the evidence next to the claim: a figure, a named client, a date, a certificate, a link to the source. A claim a reader cannot check reads as advertising.

  • Проверка заявлений об опыте

    • Reason: The site makes no claims about its experience
  • Проверка заявлений о количестве клиентов

    • Reason: The site makes no claims about how many clients it has
  • Проверка заявлений о результатах

    • Reason: The site makes no claims about results achieved
  • Объяснение гарантий

    • Source document found: yes
    • Structured warranty found: no
    • Explanation signals count: 2
  • Partial: Reviews do not show where they came from

    Fix: Show the number of reviews and state where they come from: your own database, a company profile, or an independent platform.

    • Visible reviews found: 0
    • Structured reviews found: no
    • Review count: none
    • Review platform/source found: yes
  • Фактическая глубина кейсов

    • Reason: No case studies were found to read
  • Видимость сертификатов или лицензий

    • Credential claims: yes
    • Visible assets: 5
    • Document links: 5
  • Внешние ссылки на доказательства

    • Proof contexts found: yes
    • External proof links count: 20
  • Неподтверждённые превосходные заявления

Сигналы доверия

9

6 checked · 1 passed · 3 issues

  • Issue: Contact details are insufficient

    Fix: Publish consistent contact details in at least two independent places: your contact page and structured data.

    • Corroborated values count: 2
    • Independent sources count: 4
    • Conflicting values: yes
  • Юридическая информация о компании

    • Legal name found: yes
    • Text length: ≈6130
  • Partial: Address or service area is incomplete

    Fix: State a physical address on your contact page and duplicate it in PostalAddress JSON-LD.

    • Visible address: yes
    • Structured address: yes
    • Fields found: 4
  • Видимость экспертов или команды

    • Reason: No service-provider/expert-business signals detected
    • Usable Person count: 0
  • Issue: Authorship is missing in places

    Fix: State the author of your content and add a visible byline, profile link, or Person/author markup.

    • Editorial pages: 25
    • Attributed pages: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0
    • Source types: none
  • Partial: The privacy policy is missing or perfunctory

    Fix: Add an accessible privacy policy page and link to it next to data-collection forms.

    • Forms/data collection detected: yes
    • Text length: ≈27860
    • Linked site-wide: no
  • Условия оказания услуг

    • Reason: No order/payment/booking/contract signals detected
    • Transaction signals: none
  • Issue: No reviews on the site

    Fix: Add visible customer reviews or testimonials, and only mark up reviews that genuinely appear on the page.

    • Visible reviews count: 0
    • Structured Review count: 0
    • AggregateRating found: no
    • Review pages: 0
  • Кейсы

    • Reason: No service-provider/business signals detected
    • Case pages found: 0
  • Актуальность обновления контента

    • Reason: Editorial pages exist but no reliable publish/modified date could be found
    • Editorial pages: 20
    • Pages with reliable date: 0
    • Newest date: unknown
    • Oldest date: unknown
    • Pages older than 730 days: 0
    • Date coverage percent: 0

Schema.org и JSON-LD

0

7 checked · 0 passed · 7 issues

  • Issue: No JSON-LD markup at all

    Fix: Add at least one <script type=\"application/ld+json\"> block describing your organization so AI systems can read structured facts about your business.

    • Pages scanned: 30
    • Pages with JSON-LD: 0
    • JSON-LD blocks found: 0
    • Homepage JSON-LD: no
  • Валидация JSON-LD

    • Reason: No JSON-LD found anywhere on the scanned site — nothing to validate
  • Issue: Organization markup is missing or incomplete

    Fix: Add an Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD block with your company's name, url, logo and contact details so AI systems can identify who is behind this site.

    • Organization type found: none
  • Разметка LocalBusiness

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Issue: No WebSite markup

    Fix: Add a WebSite JSON-LD block (name and url, optionally a SearchAction) so AI systems can identify this as your site's canonical web presence.

    • WebSite type found: none
  • Issue: WebPage markup is missing or incomplete

    Fix: Add a WebPage JSON-LD entity (or a more specific subtype like AboutPage/ContactPage/FAQPage) to your pages so AI systems can understand what each page represents.

    • WebPage type found: none
  • Issue: No BreadcrumbList markup

    Fix: Add BreadcrumbList JSON-LD to your deeper pages (e.g. /services/consulting) so AI systems can understand where each page sits in your site's structure.

    • Deep pages found: 25
    • BreadcrumbList pages found: 0
  • Разметка Service

    • Reason: No service signals (service-page URL/heading match, Microdata Service, or offer catalog) detected on the scanned site
    • Service type found: none
  • Разметка Product / Offer

    • Reason: No product/catalog signals detected on the scanned site
    • Product entities found: 0
    • Offer entities found: 0
  • Issue: No FAQPage markup

    Fix: Mark up your existing FAQ section with FAQPage JSON-LD (Question/Answer pairs) so AI systems can surface your answers directly.

    • FAQ blocks found: ≈130
    • FAQPage schema pages: 0
  • Разметка Person

    • Reason: No author/team signals (team/author-page match, Microdata Person, or author/creator/employee/founder/member property) detected on the scanned site
    • Person type found: none
  • Разметка Review

    • Reason: No review signals (reviews/testimonials page match, or existing Review/AggregateRating/review property) detected on the scanned site
    • Review entities found: 0
  • Разметка AggregateRating

    • Reason: No review signals detected on the scanned site — nothing to aggregate a rating from
    • AggregateRating entities found: 0
  • Ссылки sameAs

    • Reason: No Organization, LocalBusiness, or Person entity found on the scanned site
    • sameAs values found: 0
  • Зона обслуживания (areaServed)

    • Reason: No geography signal (LocalBusiness, existing areaServed, or Service paired with an address/place) detected on the scanned site
    • areaServed found: no
  • Issue: The postal address in markup is incomplete

    Fix: Add a structured PostalAddress with streetAddress, addressLocality, addressRegion, postalCode and addressCountry so AI systems can identify your business location precisely.

    • Fields found: 0
  • Соответствие Schema видимому контенту

    • Reason: The site carries no valid JSON-LD to compare with its pages
  • Риск спамной или вводящей в заблуждение разметки

    • Reason: The site carries no valid JSON-LD to compare with its pages

Готовность AI Summary

28

9 checked · 1 passed · 3 issues

  • Partial: Homepage has no AI summary

    Fix: Add a compact company description near the main heading: what it does, who it serves, and what it offers.

    • Character count: ≈130
    • Sentence count: 2
    • Initial HTML region: yes
    • Identity signal: yes
    • Activity signal: yes
    • Context signal: yes
  • Issue: Service pages have no AI summary

    Fix: Add a short summary under the H1 of each service page: what the service is, its outcome, and who it's for.

    • Service pages evaluated: 3
    • Strong summaries: 0
    • Weak summaries: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
  • Partial: The key-facts block is missing or thin

    Fix: Add a compact key-facts block: price, timeline, format, geography, audience, and key terms.

    • Facts found: 3
    • Visible/structured-only: visible
  • Partial: "Why choose us" has no proof behind it

    Fix: Tie the \"why choose us\" block to concrete evidence: case studies, reviews, ratings, certificates, or measurable facts.

    • Why-choose section URL: none
    • Heading: none
    • Proof types near: none
    • Proof types site-wide: 3
  • Issue: The «best for» block is missing in places

    Fix: Add a dedicated \"Who it's for\" or \"Best for\" block to the homepage and key offer pages.

    • Key offer pages: 1
    • Pages with best-for block: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
    • Heading: none
  • Issue: The «not for» block is missing in places

    Fix: For complex and custom offers, add a compact block covering limitations and applicability conditions.

    • Applicable offers: 3
    • Pages with not-for block: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
    • Heading: none
  • Краткие выжимки кейсов

    • Reason: No substantive case-study pages detected
    • Case pages evaluated: 0
  • Partial: Wording is too abstract

    Fix: Replace vague promises with checkable facts: what exactly you do, on what terms, with what result.

  • Partial: Too much empty filler text

    Fix: Remove sentences that carry no information — an AI answer built from them says nothing about you.

  • Абзацы, которые легко цитировать

    • Quotable paragraphs found: 14

Качество FAQ

57

6 checked · 2 passed · 2 issues

  • Наличие FAQ

    • Visible FAQ blocks: ≈130
    • Unique questions: 96
    • Pages with FAQ: 22
    • Dedicated FAQ pages: 0
  • Покрытие коммерческих вопросов

    • Commercial topic groups found: 2
  • Issue: Objections are not answered

    Fix: Add answers to common objections: cancellation, refunds, guarantees, limitations, security, or support.

    • Objection topic groups found: 0
  • Покрытие локальных вопросов

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Покрытие сравнительных вопросов

    • Reason: Only one offering was found — nothing objective to compare
    • Comparison question found: no
  • Вопросы выбора подрядчика или поставщика

    • Reason: The site does not show service/solution provider signals
    • Vendor-selection topic groups found: 0
  • Partial: FAQ answers are too vague

    Fix: Answer FAQ questions with terms, numbers and steps instead of restating the question or promising to discuss it individually.

    • FAQ pairs reviewed: 20
    • Share of specific answers: 65%
  • Issue: FAQ has no FAQPage markup

    Fix: Add FAQPage JSON-LD to every page where a question-and-answer block is visible to users.

    • Pages with visible FAQ: 22
    • Pages with FAQPage schema: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0
  • Partial: Questions are not worded the way clients ask them

    Fix: Phrase questions the way customers actually ask them out loud — that is the wording AI systems match against.

    • FAQ pairs reviewed: 20
    • Share of naturally phrased questions: 75%
  • Согласованность со страницами услуг

    • Reason: No reliable service/product candidates were found
    • Services detected: 0

Готовность к AI-ответам

66

9 checked · 6 passed · 1 issues

  • Контент под рекомендательные запросы

  • Issue: "Best provider for…" questions are not covered

    Fix: Answer how to choose a provider for this task — selection criteria, comparisons, and where you fit among the alternatives.

  • Покрытие проблемных запросов

  • Покрытие локальных запросов

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Partial: There is almost no comparison of options

    Fix: Add a dedicated comparison of the options covering price, composition, outcome, limitations, and selection guidance.

    • Comparable group type: yes
    • Candidates: 0
    • Dimensions found: 1
    • Strong/weak: weak
  • Страницы для этапа выбора

    • Offers evaluated: 3
    • Decision-stage pages: 3
    • Coverage percent: 100%
  • Partial: It is not clear how this differs from competitors

    Fix: Name differences a reader can check — numbers, named methods, specific guarantees — instead of general claims.

  • Честные ограничения

  • Понятный следующий шаг

    • Answer-oriented pages: 3
    • Pages with specific next step: 3
    • Coverage percent: 100%
  • Не шаблонный контент

Внешняя согласованность

100

1 checked · 1 passed · 0 issues

  • Видимость Google Business Profile

  • Согласованность названия бренда

  • Согласованность адреса

  • Согласованность телефона

  • Согласованность описания услуг

  • Видимость внешних отзывов

  • Внешние ссылки и цитирования

  • Ссылки на социальные сети и профили

    • Visible official profiles: 3
    • Structured profiles: 0
    • Overlapping profiles: 0
  • Упоминания бренда

  • Риск противоречий

Коммерческое доверие

97

11 checked · 9 passed · 1 issues

  • Понятность оффера на первом экране

    • Identity found: yes
    • Offer found: yes
    • Primary action found: yes
    • Method: initial HTML source region
  • Видимость CTA

    • Primary CTA count: ≈140
    • Generic CTA count: 20
    • Initial-region CTA: primary
  • Наличие формы заявки

    • Service-provider signal: no
    • Quote/contact CTA: no
    • Lead form found: yes
    • Contact page or channel: yes
  • Issue: Price and conditions are not visible

    Fix: State a price, a range, a starting-from price, or a clear custom-quote condition on the offer page.

    • Visible price/condition count: 52
    • Structured-only count: 0
  • Объяснение гарантий

    • Explanation signals count: 3
    • Structured warranty: no
  • Partial: No proof next to the call to action

    Fix: Place a review, rating, case study, or other verifiable proof near the primary action.

    • Structurally near: no
    • Proximity reason: not structurally near
  • Быстрый способ связи

    • Reason: No provider/contact-oriented signals detected
    • Fast contact types: n/a
  • Юридические страницы

    • Data collection: yes
    • Transaction: no
    • Linked near flow: yes
  • Мобильная готовность к конверсии

    • Viewport adapts to the device: The page declares itself usable on a phone
  • Низкий уровень отвлекающих элементов

  • Блоки доверия рядом с точками конверсии

  • Понятный следующий шаг

    • Key offer pages: 1
    • Pages with specific CTA: 1
    • Initial specific CTA: yes
    • Generic CTA count: 20

Want to know which of these problems your own site has? Run an AIRA check.

Similar examples

AI SEO Audit Example — a SaaS product, 41/100 | AIRA