GEO audit of a SaaS product — AI readiness 66/100

An anonymised report of a real site — SaaS product. The address, the company name and any identifying quotes are hidden.

This audit in brief

This is an audit of a SaaS product scoring 66 out of 100. The crawl read about 30 pages; 95% of the applicable criteria reached a verdict.

The strongest area is “AI Access & Crawlability” — 100 out of 100.

The three weakest areas: Entity Clarity — 19/100, AI Summary Readiness — 27/100, Proof Layer — 29/100.

“Entity Clarity” is only partly prepared: some criteria pass, others do not.

The report at a glance

Strengths

  • AI Access & Crawlability100/100
  • Schema.org / JSON-LD92/100
  • Trust Signals72/100

Main problems

  • Entity Clarity19/100
  • AI Summary Readiness27/100
  • Proof Layer29/100
  • External Consistency30/100
  • Conversion Trust33/100

Anonymised example report: SaaS product. Addresses, names and quotes are hidden.

66of 100
Readiness for AI recommendations

~30 pages

criteria evaluated: 95%

criteria 3.8.0 · engine 1.37.0

Доступность для AI

100

11 checked · 11 passed · 0 issues

  • Главная страница возвращает HTTP 200

  • Финальный URL использует HTTPS

  • robots.txt присутствует

    • HTTP status: ≈200
  • XML sitemap присутствует

    • URLs indexed: ≈2950
  • OAI-SearchBot разрешён

  • Политика для GPTBot ясна

  • Googlebot разрешён

  • YandexBot разрешён

  • Нет глобального Disallow: /

    • Global block: None
  • HTML-контент доступен

  • Страницы, закрытые от индексации

    • Homepage closed to indexing: no
    • Pages closed to indexing: 0
    • Share of read pages: 0%

Понятность компании как сущности

19

10 checked · 3 passed · 5 issues

  • Issue: Brand name is unclear

    Fix: Multiple conflicting company/brand names were found with no single dominant one. Standardize on one name across Organization/WebSite JSON-LD, Open Graph, and your pages.

  • Partial: Legal entity details are incomplete

    Fix: A legal/company name is visible, but no registration identifier (VAT/tax ID/company number, or ИНН/ОГРН) was found. Add one.

  • Issue: Business category is unclear

    Fix: State your business category consistently in Organization/Service/Product JSON-LD, the homepage title, and your company summary.

  • Partial: The «what we do» statement is unconvincing

    Fix: Add a short paragraph to the homepage that directly explains what the company does and what services or products it offers.

    • Character count: 42
    • Subject signal: no
    • Activity signal: yes
    • Structured corroboration: yes
  • География оказания услуг

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Понятность целевой аудитории

  • Issue: About page says too little

    Fix: Add a substantive About page describing what you do, your history, your team, your legal details, and a link to contact.

    • About page found: no
  • Полнота страницы контактов

    • Contact form: yes
    • Channels count: 4
  • Внешние профили sameAs

    • sameAs count: 4
    • Visible profiles count: 7
    • Overlapping profiles count: 1
  • Issue: Company details differ from page to page

    Fix: Use the same brand and legal name everywhere — in Schema.org, Open Graph, and your main pages.

  • Issue: A quotable company summary is missing

    Fix: Publish a company summary in your Organization JSON-LD: a "description" of at least 150 characters and two sentences that names the company, what it does and who or where it serves.

    • Summary source: none
  • Чёткое позиционирование бренда

    • Reason: AI evaluation was unavailable for this run

Структура услуг

70

10 checked · 7 passed · 3 issues

  • Отдельная страница для каждой ключевой услуги

    • Core services detected: 10
    • Dedicated service pages: 10
    • Coverage percent: 100%
  • Конкретное название услуги

    • Services detected: 10
    • Specific names: 10
    • Generic names: 0
    • Coverage percent: 100%
  • Понятный результат услуги

    • Services evaluated: 10
    • Services with outcome: 10
    • Coverage percent: 100%
  • Issue: Not every service says who it is for

    Fix: Add a \"Who it's for\" block to service pages and list the client types or tasks the offer suits.

    • Services evaluated: 10
    • Services with target audience: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
  • Issue: Not every service says who it is not for

    Fix: For complex or custom services, state limitations, requirements, and cases where the service is not a fit.

    • Applicable services: 9
    • Services with limitations/non-fit: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
  • Наличие цены или диапазона цены

    • Services evaluated: 10
    • Visible price coverage: 9
    • Structured-only coverage: 0
    • Coverage percent: 90%
  • Issue: Timelines are missing for some services

    Fix: State an approximate timeline or duration range for project and custom-delivery services.

    • Applicable services: 9
    • Services with timeline: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
  • Этапы работы

    • Applicable services: 9
    • Services with process: 9
    • Coverage percent: 100%
  • Доказательства или кейсы по услуге

    • Services evaluated: 10
    • Services with specific proof: 9
    • Strong coverage: 9
    • Weak coverage: 1
  • FAQ по конкретной услуге

    • Services evaluated: 10
    • Services with specific FAQ: 10
    • Coverage percent: 100%

Слой доказательств

29

8 checked · 2 passed · 5 issues

  • Issue: Commercial claims are not backed up

    Fix: Put the evidence next to the claim: a figure, a named client, a date, a certificate, a link to the source. A claim a reader cannot check reads as advertising.

  • Issue: Claims about experience are unsupported

    Fix: Show what the experience consists of: since when, how many projects, in which industries. "Years on the market" without content is not experience, it is age.

  • Issue: Claims about client numbers are unsupported

    Fix: Name the clients, or say where the count comes from and as of when. A round number with no source is the first thing a reader discounts.

  • Проверка заявлений о результатах

    • Reason: The site makes no claims about results achieved
  • Объяснение гарантий

    • Source document found: yes
    • Structured warranty found: no
    • Explanation signals count: 4
  • Видимость источников отзывов

    • Visible reviews found: 20
    • Structured reviews found: yes
    • Review count: ≈360
    • Review platform/source found: yes
  • Issue: Case studies carry no facts

    Fix: Write each case as task, approach and result, with numbers. A case that only names the client proves nothing an assistant can repeat.

  • Видимость сертификатов или лицензий

    • Reason: No certificate/license/accreditation claim found
    • Credential claims: 0
  • Issue: Too few links to proof outside the site

    Fix: Add links to independent sources: review cards, registries, publications, certificates, or external case corroboration.

    • Proof contexts found: yes
    • External proof links count: 0
    • Proof link types: none
  • Partial: Superlatives with nothing behind them

    Fix: Back a superlative with what makes it true — a ranking, an award, a measured figure — or drop it: an unproven "best" costs trust and gives an AI nothing to quote.

Сигналы доверия

72

9 checked · 6 passed · 2 issues

  • Реальные контактные данные

    • Corroborated values count: 1
    • Independent sources count: 2
    • Conflicting values: no
  • Issue: Legal company information is incomplete

    Fix: Publish the legal company name and key registration details on a dedicated legal/company details page.

    • Legal page URL: none
    • Legal name found: no
    • Identifier types: none
    • Text length: 0
  • Физический адрес или зона оказания услуг

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Partial: The people behind the site are barely visible

    Fix: Add a team or experts page with names, roles, and their connection to the organization.

    • Dedicated team page: no
    • Usable Person count: 2
    • Usable ProfileBlock count: 1
    • Visible ProfileBlock count: 1
  • Указание авторов или экспертов

    • Editorial pages: 2
    • Attributed pages: 2
    • Coverage percent: ≈100
  • Политика конфиденциальности

    • Forms/data collection detected: yes
    • Text length: ≈7080
    • Linked site-wide: yes
  • Условия оказания услуг

    • Text length: ≈41600
    • Linked from transaction flow: yes
  • Отзывы

    • Visible reviews count: 20
    • Structured Review count: ≈260
    • AggregateRating found: yes
    • Review pages: 0
  • Issue: Too few case studies

    Fix: Add case studies describing the task, approach, and result for your core services.

    • Case pages found: 0
    • Substantive cases: 0
    • Section groups: 0
    • Text length: 0
  • Актуальность обновления контента

    • Editorial pages: 2
    • Pages with reliable date: 2
    • Pages older than 730 days: 1
    • Date coverage percent: ≈100

Schema.org и JSON-LD

92

14 checked · 13 passed · 1 issues

  • Наличие JSON-LD

    • Pages scanned: 30
    • Pages with JSON-LD: 30
    • JSON-LD blocks found: ≈100
    • Homepage JSON-LD: yes
  • Валидация JSON-LD

    • Total blocks: ≈100
    • Valid blocks: ≈100
    • Invalid blocks: 0
    • Pages with invalid JSON-LD: 0
  • Разметка Organization

  • Разметка LocalBusiness

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Issue: No WebSite markup

    Fix: Add a WebSite JSON-LD block (name and url, optionally a SearchAction) so AI systems can identify this as your site's canonical web presence.

    • WebSite type found: none
  • Разметка WebPage

  • Разметка BreadcrumbList

  • Разметка Service

    • Reason: No service signals (service-page URL/heading match, Microdata Service, or offer catalog) detected on the scanned site
    • Service type found: none
  • Разметка Product / Offer

    • Product entities found: 21
    • Offer entities found: 22
    • Related pair found: yes
    • Price: 0
  • Разметка FAQPage

  • Разметка Person

  • Разметка Review

    • Rating: 5
  • Разметка AggregateRating

  • Ссылки sameAs

    • Valid sameAs count: 3
    • Invalid sameAs count: 0
  • Зона обслуживания (areaServed)

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Почтовый адрес (PostalAddress)

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Соответствие Schema видимому контенту

  • Риск спамной или вводящей в заблуждение разметки

Готовность AI Summary

27

6 checked · 1 passed · 2 issues

  • Partial: Homepage has no AI summary

    Fix: Add a compact company description near the main heading: what it does, who it serves, and what it offers.

    • Character count: ≈110
    • Sentence count: 2
    • Initial HTML region: no
    • Identity signal: no
    • Activity signal: no
    • Context signal: yes
  • Partial: Service pages have no AI summary

    Fix: Add a short summary under the H1 of each service page: what the service is, its outcome, and who it's for.

    • Service pages evaluated: 10
    • Strong summaries: 0
    • Weak summaries: 10
    • Coverage percent: 0%
  • Блок ключевых фактов

    • Facts found: 6
    • Visible/structured-only: visible
  • Partial: "Why choose us" has no proof behind it

    Fix: Tie the \"why choose us\" block to concrete evidence: case studies, reviews, ratings, certificates, or measurable facts.

    • Why-choose section URL: none
    • Heading: none
    • Proof types near: none
    • Proof types site-wide: 3
  • Issue: The «best for» block is missing in places

    Fix: Add a dedicated \"Who it's for\" or \"Best for\" block to the homepage and key offer pages.

    • Key offer pages: 23
    • Pages with best-for block: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
    • Heading: none
  • Issue: The «not for» block is missing in places

    Fix: For complex and custom offers, add a compact block covering limitations and applicability conditions.

    • Applicable offers: 9
    • Pages with not-for block: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
    • Heading: none
  • Краткие выжимки кейсов

    • Reason: No substantive case-study pages detected
    • Case pages evaluated: 0
  • Конкретность формулировок

    • Reason: AI evaluation was unavailable for this run
  • Низкий уровень пустых фраз

    • Reason: AI evaluation was unavailable for this run
  • Абзацы, которые легко цитировать

    • Reason: AI evaluation was unavailable for this run

Качество FAQ

65

7 checked · 4 passed · 2 issues

  • Наличие FAQ

    • Visible FAQ blocks: 19
    • Unique questions: 17
    • Pages with FAQ: 7
    • Dedicated FAQ pages: 1
  • Покрытие коммерческих вопросов

    • Commercial topic groups found: 2
  • Issue: Objections are not answered

    Fix: Add answers to common objections: cancellation, refunds, guarantees, limitations, security, or support.

    • Objection topic groups found: 0
  • Покрытие локальных вопросов

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Issue: Comparison questions are not answered

    Fix: Add questions about the differences between services, plans, products, or solution options.

    • Comparison topic groups found: 0
  • Вопросы выбора подрядчика или поставщика

    • Reason: The site does not show service/solution provider signals
    • Vendor-selection topic groups found: 0
  • Конкретность ответов

    • FAQ pairs reviewed: 20
    • Share of specific answers: 90%
  • Partial: FAQ has no FAQPage markup

    Fix: Add FAQPage JSON-LD to every page where a question-and-answer block is visible to users.

    • Pages with visible FAQ: 7
    • Pages with FAQPage schema: 4
    • Coverage percent: 57
  • Естественные формулировки вопросов

    • FAQ pairs reviewed: 20
    • Share of naturally phrased questions: 92%
  • Согласованность со страницами услуг

    • Reason: No reliable service/product candidates were found
    • Services detected: 0

Готовность к AI-ответам

71

8 checked · 6 passed · 2 issues

  • Контент под рекомендательные запросы

  • Покрытие интента «лучший исполнитель для…»

  • Покрытие проблемных запросов

  • Покрытие локальных запросов

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Issue: There is almost no comparison of options

    Fix: Add a dedicated comparison of the options covering price, composition, outcome, limitations, and selection guidance.

    • Comparable group type: yes
    • Candidates: 0
    • Comparison page URL: none
    • Dimensions found: 0
    • Strong/weak: none
    • Heading: none
  • Страницы для этапа выбора

    • Offers evaluated: 10
    • Decision-stage pages: 10
    • Coverage percent: 100%
  • Понятные отличия от конкурентов

  • Issue: Limitations are not admitted anywhere

    Fix: Say plainly what you do not do and whom you do not suit — an honest limit is a strong trust signal for both people and AI.

  • Понятный следующий шаг

    • Answer-oriented pages: 10
    • Pages with specific next step: 10
    • Coverage percent: 100%
  • Не шаблонный контент

    • Reason: AI evaluation was unavailable for this run

Внешняя согласованность

30

1 checked · 0 passed · 0 issues

  • Видимость Google Business Profile

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Согласованность названия бренда

  • Согласованность адреса

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Согласованность телефона

  • Согласованность описания услуг

  • Видимость внешних отзывов

  • Внешние ссылки и цитирования

  • Partial: Too few links to official profiles

    Fix: Add links to the company's official profiles on the site and duplicate them in sameAs.

    • Visible official profiles: 1
    • Structured profiles: 4
    • Overlapping profiles: 0
  • Упоминания бренда

  • Риск противоречий

Коммерческое доверие

33

12 checked · 3 passed · 1 issues

  • Partial: The first screen does not say what is on offer

    Fix: Place the name or a clear heading, a specific offer, and the main target action near the start of the homepage.

    • Identity found: yes
    • Offer found: yes
    • Primary action found: no
    • CTA label: none
    • Method: initial HTML source region
  • Partial: The call to action is hard to find

    Fix: Add a specific action button near the start of the page: order, book, get a quote, or get started.

    • Primary CTA count: ≈130
    • Generic CTA count: 0
    • Initial-region CTA: none
    • Label: none
    • Target: none
  • Наличие формы заявки

    • Service-provider signal: yes
    • Quote/contact CTA: no
    • Lead form found: yes
    • Contact page or channel: yes
  • Видимость цены или условий

    • Visible price/condition count: 44
    • Structured-only count: 22
  • Объяснение гарантий

    • Explanation signals count: 4
    • Structured warranty: no
  • Partial: No proof next to the call to action

    Fix: Place a review, rating, case study, or other verifiable proof near the primary action.

    • Structurally near: no
    • Proximity reason: not structurally near
  • Partial: Getting in touch quickly is hard

    Fix: Add a fast way to get in touch: a phone number, a messenger, or a prominent contact form.

    • Source URL count: 4
    • Visible phone/messenger count: 2
    • Phone (masked): none
  • Partial: Legal pages are missing

    Fix: Add links to the privacy policy and terms near forms, checkout, or payment.

    • Data collection: yes
    • Transaction: yes
    • Linked near flow: no
  • Partial: Hard to convert on a phone

    Fix: Fix what still does not fit a phone screen: fixed pixel widths, tables with many columns, an over-long form, a blocked zoom. The viewport is declared correctly — these are what is left.

    • Elements with a fixed width wider than a phone screen: 1
  • Issue: Too much distracts from the action

    Fix: Leave one obvious next step on the page. Several different actions asking for the same attention means none of them is the next step.

  • Partial: No trust signals where the decision is made

    Fix: Add trust signals near the form or button: reviews, contacts, guarantees, company details, or terms.

  • Partial: The next step is not obvious

    Fix: Use specific actions such as \"Get a quote\", \"Book now\", \"Order\", or \"Start a check\" instead of a vague \"Learn more\".

    • Key offer pages: 23
    • Pages with specific CTA: 23
    • Initial specific CTA: no
    • Generic CTA count: 0
    • Label: none

Want to know which of these problems your own site has? Run an AIRA check.

Similar examples

AI SEO Audit Example — a SaaS product, 66/100 | AIRA