GEO audit of a local business — AI readiness 60/100
An anonymised report of a real site — local business. The address, the company name and any identifying quotes are hidden.
This audit in brief
This is an audit of a local business scoring 60 out of 100. The crawl read about 20 pages; 99% of the applicable criteria reached a verdict.
The strongest area is “Schema.org / JSON-LD” — 75 out of 100.
The three weakest areas: Trust Signals — 16/100, Proof Layer — 30/100, FAQ Quality — 50/100.
“Trust Signals” is only partly prepared: some criteria pass, others do not.
The report at a glance
Strengths
- Schema.org / JSON-LD75/100
- Entity Clarity72/100
- Answer Readiness66/100
Main problems
- Trust Signals16/100
- Proof Layer30/100
- FAQ Quality50/100
- Service Structure50/100
- AI Summary Readiness56/100
Anonymised example report: local business. Addresses, names and quotes are hidden.
~20 pages
criteria evaluated: 99%
criteria 2.2.0 · engine 1.24.0
Доступность для AI
—10 checked · 10 passed · 0 issues
Главная страница возвращает HTTP 200
Финальный URL использует HTTPS
robots.txt присутствует
- HTTP status: ≈200
XML sitemap присутствует
OAI-SearchBot разрешён
Политика для GPTBot ясна
Googlebot разрешён
YandexBot разрешён
Нет глобального Disallow: /
- Global block: None
HTML-контент доступен
Понятность компании как сущности
7211 checked · 7 passed · 1 issues
Ясность названия бренда
Видимость юридического лица
- Identifier value: ********9903
Partial: Business category is unclear
Fix: State your business category consistently in Organization/Service/Product JSON-LD, the homepage title, and your company summary.
Чёткое описание «что мы делаем»
- Character count: ≈180
- Subject signal: yes
- Activity signal: yes
- Structured corroboration: yes
География оказания услуг
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Issue: Target audience is unclear
Fix: Add a dedicated \"Who it's for\" section and explicitly list the types of customers, companies, or users the offering fits.
- Audience source: none
Качество страницы «О компании»
- Text length: ≈1960
- Supporting signals count: 4
Полнота страницы контактов
- Contact form: yes
- Channels count: 4
Внешние профили sameAs
- sameAs count: 0
- Visible profiles count: 2
- Overlapping profiles count: 0
Согласованность сущности на страницах
Partial: A quotable company summary is missing
Fix: Add a compact company summary to the homepage: name, what you do, who you help, and where or in what format you offer your services.
- Character count: ≈180
- Sentence count: 1
- Identity signal: yes
- Activity signal: yes
- Context signal: yes
Partial: Brand positioning is indistinct
Fix: State what makes the company different in a way a reader could repeat: a named method, a measurable outcome, a specific focus.
Структура услуг
508 checked · 4 passed · 4 issues
Отдельная страница для каждой ключевой услуги
- Reason: No service/business-provider signals detected
- Core services detected: 0
Конкретное название услуги
- Services detected: 4
- Specific names: 4
- Generic names: 0
- Coverage percent: 100%
Понятный результат услуги
- Services evaluated: 4
- Services with outcome: 3
- Coverage percent: 75%
Issue: Not every service says who it is for
Fix: Add a \"Who it's for\" block to service pages and list the client types or tasks the offer suits.
- Services evaluated: 4
- Services with target audience: 0
- Coverage percent: 0%
Issue: Not every service says who it is not for
Fix: For complex or custom services, state limitations, requirements, and cases where the service is not a fit.
- Applicable services: 4
- Services with limitations/non-fit: 0
- Coverage percent: 0%
Наличие цены или диапазона цены
- Services evaluated: 4
- Visible price coverage: 3
- Structured-only coverage: 0
- Coverage percent: 75%
Issue: Timelines are missing for some services
Fix: State an approximate timeline or duration range for project and custom-delivery services.
- Applicable services: 4
- Services with timeline: 0
- Coverage percent: 0%
Issue: Process steps are missing for some services
Fix: Describe the service delivery process in at least three sequential steps.
- Applicable services: 4
- Services with process: 0
- Steps count: 0
- Coverage percent: 0%
Доказательства или кейсы по услуге
- Reason: No reliable service candidates or service-provider signals detected
- Services evaluated: 0
FAQ по конкретной услуге
- Services evaluated: 4
- Services with specific FAQ: 3
- Coverage percent: 75%
Слой доказательств
306 checked · 0 passed · 3 issues
Issue: Commercial claims are not backed up
Fix: Put the evidence next to the claim: a figure, a named client, a date, a certificate, a link to the source. A claim a reader cannot check reads as advertising.
Проверка заявлений об опыте
- Reason: The site makes no claims about its experience
Проверка заявлений о количестве клиентов
- Reason: The site makes no claims about how many clients it has
Issue: Claims about results are unsupported
Fix: Show the numbers behind the result: from what to what, over what period, for whom. A result without a baseline cannot be judged and will not be quoted.
Partial: The guarantee is promised but not explained
Fix: Tie the guarantee statement to distinct conditions: duration, scope, limitations, and the claims process.
- Source document found: no
- Structured warranty found: no
- Explanation signals count: 3
Partial: Reviews do not show where they came from
Fix: Show the number of reviews and state where they come from: your own database, a company profile, or an independent platform.
- Visible reviews found: 0
- Structured reviews found: no
- Review count: none
- Review platform/source found: yes
Фактическая глубина кейсов
- Reason: No case studies were found to read
Видимость сертификатов или лицензий
- Reason: No certificate/license/accreditation claim found
- Credential claims: 0
Partial: Too few links to proof outside the site
Fix: Add links to independent sources: review cards, registries, publications, certificates, or external case corroboration.
- Proof contexts found: yes
- External proof links count: 1
Issue: Superlatives with nothing behind them
Fix: Back a superlative with what makes it true — a ranking, an award, a measured figure — or drop it: an unproven "best" costs trust and gives an AI nothing to quote.
Сигналы доверия
164 checked · 1 passed · 2 issues
Issue: Contact details are insufficient
Fix: Publish consistent contact details in at least two independent places: your contact page and structured data.
- Corroborated values count: 3
- Independent sources count: 3
- Conflicting values: yes
Partial: Legal company information is incomplete
Fix: Publish the legal company name and key registration details on a dedicated legal/company details page.
- Legal page URL: none
- Legal name found: yes
- Text length: 0
Физический адрес или зона оказания услуг
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Видимость экспертов или команды
- Reason: No service-provider/expert-business signals detected
- Usable Person count: 0
Указание авторов или экспертов
- Reason: No editorial content pages detected
- Editorial pages: 0
Политика конфиденциальности
- Forms/data collection detected: yes
- Text length: ≈22030
- Linked site-wide: yes
Условия оказания услуг
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Issue: No reviews on the site
Fix: Add visible customer reviews or testimonials, and only mark up reviews that genuinely appear on the page.
- Visible reviews count: 0
- Structured Review count: 0
- AggregateRating found: no
- Review pages: 0
Кейсы
- Reason: No service-provider/business signals detected
- Case pages found: 0
Актуальность обновления контента
- Reason: Editorial pages exist but no reliable publish/modified date could be found
- Editorial pages: 0
- Pages with reliable date: 0
- Newest date: unknown
- Oldest date: unknown
- Pages older than 730 days: 0
- Date coverage percent: 0
Schema.org и JSON-LD
759 checked · 7 passed · 2 issues
Наличие JSON-LD
- Pages scanned: 21
- Pages with JSON-LD: 21
- JSON-LD blocks found: 21
- Homepage JSON-LD: yes
Валидация JSON-LD
- Total blocks: 21
- Valid blocks: 21
- Invalid blocks: 0
- Pages with invalid JSON-LD: 0
Issue: Organization markup is missing or incomplete
Fix: Add an Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD block with your company's name, url, logo and contact details so AI systems can identify who is behind this site.
- Organization type found: none
Разметка LocalBusiness
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Разметка WebSite
Разметка WebPage
Разметка BreadcrumbList
Разметка Service
- Reason: No service signals (service-page URL/heading match, Microdata Service, or offer catalog) detected on the scanned site
- Service type found: none
Разметка Product / Offer
- Reason: No product/catalog signals detected on the scanned site
- Product entities found: 0
- Offer entities found: 0
Issue: No FAQPage markup
Fix: Mark up your existing FAQ section with FAQPage JSON-LD (Question/Answer pairs) so AI systems can surface your answers directly.
- FAQ blocks found: 16
- FAQPage schema pages: 0
Разметка Person
- Reason: No author/team signals (team/author-page match, Microdata Person, or author/creator/employee/founder/member property) detected on the scanned site
- Person type found: none
Разметка Review
- Reason: No review signals (reviews/testimonials page match, or existing Review/AggregateRating/review property) detected on the scanned site
- Review entities found: 0
Разметка AggregateRating
- Reason: No review signals detected on the scanned site — nothing to aggregate a rating from
- AggregateRating entities found: 0
Ссылки sameAs
- Reason: No Organization, LocalBusiness, or Person entity found on the scanned site
- sameAs values found: 0
Зона обслуживания (areaServed)
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Почтовый адрес (PostalAddress)
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Соответствие Schema видимому контенту
Риск спамной или вводящей в заблуждение разметки
Готовность AI Summary
569 checked · 2 passed · 2 issues
Partial: Homepage has no AI summary
Fix: Add a compact company description near the main heading: what it does, who it serves, and what it offers.
- Character count: 49
- Sentence count: 1
- Initial HTML region: no
- Identity signal: no
- Activity signal: no
- Context signal: yes
Partial: Service pages have no AI summary
Fix: Add a short summary under the H1 of each service page: what the service is, its outcome, and who it's for.
- Service pages evaluated: 4
- Strong summaries: 0
- Weak summaries: 4
- Coverage percent: 0%
Блок ключевых фактов
- Facts found: 3
- Visible/structured-only: visible
Partial: "Why choose us" has no proof behind it
Fix: Tie the \"why choose us\" block to concrete evidence: case studies, reviews, ratings, certificates, or measurable facts.
- Why-choose section URL: none
- Heading: none
- Proof types near: none
- Proof types site-wide: 3
Issue: The «best for» block is missing in places
Fix: Add a dedicated \"Who it's for\" or \"Best for\" block to the homepage and key offer pages.
- Key offer pages: 1
- Pages with best-for block: 0
- Coverage percent: 0%
- Heading: none
Issue: The «not for» block is missing in places
Fix: For complex and custom offers, add a compact block covering limitations and applicability conditions.
- Applicable offers: 4
- Pages with not-for block: 0
- Coverage percent: 0%
- Heading: none
Краткие выжимки кейсов
- Reason: No substantive case-study pages detected
- Case pages evaluated: 0
Partial: Wording is too abstract
Fix: Replace vague promises with checkable facts: what exactly you do, on what terms, with what result.
Partial: Too much empty filler text
Fix: Remove sentences that carry no information — an AI answer built from them says nothing about you.
Абзацы, которые легко цитировать
Качество FAQ
506 checked · 3 passed · 3 issues
Наличие FAQ
- Visible FAQ blocks: 16
- Unique questions: 6
- Pages with FAQ: 16
- Dedicated FAQ pages: 0
Issue: Buying questions are not answered
Fix: Add answers about pricing, timelines, ordering process, payment, or service availability.
- Commercial topic groups found: 0
Issue: Objections are not answered
Fix: Add answers to common objections: cancellation, refunds, guarantees, limitations, security, or support.
- Objection topic groups found: 0
Покрытие локальных вопросов
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Покрытие сравнительных вопросов
- Reason: Only one offering was found — nothing objective to compare
- Comparison question found: no
Вопросы выбора подрядчика или поставщика
- Reason: The site does not show service/solution provider signals
- Vendor-selection topic groups found: 0
Конкретность ответов
- FAQ pairs reviewed: 16
- Share of specific answers: 100%
Issue: FAQ has no FAQPage markup
Fix: Add FAQPage JSON-LD to every page where a question-and-answer block is visible to users.
- Pages with visible FAQ: 16
- Pages with FAQPage schema: 0
- Coverage percent: 0
Естественные формулировки вопросов
- FAQ pairs reviewed: 16
- Share of naturally phrased questions: 100%
Согласованность со страницами услуг
- Reason: No reliable service/product candidates were found
- Services detected: 0
Готовность к AI-ответам
669 checked · 6 passed · 2 issues
Контент под рекомендательные запросы
Покрытие интента «лучший исполнитель для…»
Покрытие проблемных запросов
Покрытие локальных запросов
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Issue: There is almost no comparison of options
Fix: Add a dedicated comparison of the options covering price, composition, outcome, limitations, and selection guidance.
- Comparable group type: yes
- Candidates: 0
- Comparison page URL: none
- Dimensions found: 0
- Strong/weak: none
- Heading: none
Страницы для этапа выбора
- Offers evaluated: 4
- Decision-stage pages: 3
- Coverage percent: 75%
Partial: It is not clear how this differs from competitors
Fix: Name differences a reader can check — numbers, named methods, specific guarantees — instead of general claims.
Issue: Limitations are not admitted anywhere
Fix: Say plainly what you do not do and whom you do not suit — an honest limit is a strong trust signal for both people and AI.
Понятный следующий шаг
- Answer-oriented pages: 3
- Pages with specific next step: 3
- Coverage percent: 100%
Не шаблонный контент
Внешняя согласованность
601 checked · 0 passed · 0 issues
Видимость Google Business Profile
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Согласованность названия бренда
Согласованность адреса
- Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
Согласованность телефона
Согласованность описания услуг
Видимость внешних отзывов
Внешние ссылки и цитирования
Partial: Too few links to official profiles
Fix: Add links to the company's official profiles on the site and duplicate them in sameAs.
- Visible official profiles: 1
- Structured profiles: 0
- Overlapping profiles: 0
Упоминания бренда
Риск противоречий
Коммерческое доверие
6010 checked · 3 passed · 2 issues
Partial: The first screen does not say what is on offer
Fix: Place the name or a clear heading, a specific offer, and the main target action near the start of the homepage.
- Identity found: yes
- Offer found: yes
- Primary action found: no
- CTA label: none
- Method: initial HTML source region
Partial: The call to action is hard to find
Fix: Add a specific action button near the start of the page: order, book, get a quote, or get started.
- Primary CTA count: ≈220
- Generic CTA count: ≈180
- Initial-region CTA: none
- Label: none
- Target: none
Наличие формы заявки
- Service-provider signal: no
- Quote/contact CTA: no
- Lead form found: yes
- Contact page or channel: yes
Видимость цены или условий
- Reason: No offering/commercial signals detected
- Visible price/condition count: 0
Объяснение гарантий
- Explanation signals count: 4
- Structured warranty: no
Issue: No proof next to the call to action
Fix: Place a review, rating, case study, or other verifiable proof near the primary action.
- Proof type: none
- Structurally near: no
- Proof source URL: none
- Proximity reason: not structurally near
Быстрый способ связи
- Reason: No provider/contact-oriented signals detected
- Fast contact types: n/a
Юридические страницы
- Data collection: yes
- Transaction: no
- Terms page/link: none
- Linked near flow: yes
Partial: Hard to convert on a phone
Fix: Fix what still does not fit a phone screen: fixed pixel widths, tables with many columns, an over-long form, a blocked zoom. The viewport is declared correctly — these are what is left.
- Fields in the longest form: 10
Issue: Too much distracts from the action
Fix: Leave one obvious next step on the page. Several different actions asking for the same attention means none of them is the next step.
Partial: No trust signals where the decision is made
Fix: Add trust signals near the form or button: reviews, contacts, guarantees, company details, or terms.
Partial: The next step is not obvious
Fix: Use specific actions such as \"Get a quote\", \"Book now\", \"Order\", or \"Start a check\" instead of a vague \"Learn more\".
- Key offer pages: 0
- Pages with specific CTA: 0
- Initial specific CTA: no
- Generic CTA count: ≈180
- Label: none
Want to know which of these problems your own site has? Run an AIRA check.