GEO audit of a property developer site — AI readiness 29/100

An anonymised report of a real site — property developer site. The address, the company name and any identifying quotes are hidden.

This audit in brief

An audit of a property developer site. The score is 29 out of 100; about 30 pages were read and 96% of the criteria evaluated.

The strongest area is “Answer Readiness” — 61 out of 100.

The three weakest areas: AI Access & Crawlability — 0/100, FAQ Quality — 0/100, Schema.org / JSON-LD — 0/100.

“AI Access & Crawlability” is only partly prepared: some criteria pass, others do not.

The report at a glance

Strengths

  • Answer Readiness61/100
  • Proof Layer55/100
  • Service Structure38/100

Main problems

  • AI Access & Crawlability0/100
  • FAQ Quality0/100
  • Schema.org / JSON-LD0/100
  • Trust Signals2/100
  • Entity Clarity22/100

Anonymised example report: real-estate site. Addresses, names and quotes are hidden.

29of 100
Readiness for AI recommendations

~30 pages

criteria evaluated: 96%

criteria 3.3.0 · engine 1.28.0

Доступность для AI

0

10 checked · 9 passed · 1 issues

  • Главная страница возвращает HTTP 200

  • Финальный URL использует HTTPS

  • robots.txt присутствует

    • HTTP status: ≈200
  • Issue: XML sitemap is missing or served wrong

    Fix: Add a sitemap.xml and reference it from robots.txt. A sitemap helps AI crawlers discover all pages.

  • OAI-SearchBot разрешён

  • Политика для GPTBot ясна

  • Googlebot разрешён

  • YandexBot разрешён

  • Нет глобального Disallow: /

    • Global block: None
  • HTML-контент доступен

Понятность компании как сущности

22

9 checked · 4 passed · 4 issues

  • Issue: Brand name is unclear

    Fix: Add a clear, consistent company or brand name to your Organization/WebSite JSON-LD, Open Graph tags, and main pages.

    • Detected name: none
  • Видимость юридического лица

    • Identifier value: *********8958
  • Issue: Business category is unclear

    Fix: State your business category consistently in Organization/Service/Product JSON-LD, the homepage title, and your company summary.

    • Category candidate: none
  • Чёткое описание «что мы делаем»

    • Character count: ≈390
    • Subject signal: yes
    • Activity signal: yes
    • Structured corroboration: yes
  • География оказания услуг

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Issue: Target audience is unclear

    Fix: Add a dedicated \"Who it's for\" section and explicitly list the types of customers, companies, or users the offering fits.

    • Audience source: none
  • Качество страницы «О компании»

    • Text length: ≈3030
    • Supporting signals count: 3
  • Полнота страницы контактов

    • Contact form: yes
    • Channels count: 4
  • Внешние профили sameAs

    • Reason: No Organization/LocalBusiness/Person entity or reliable company name found
    • sameAs count: 0
  • Согласованность сущности на страницах

    • Reason: Fewer than two independent strong name sources were found across the scanned pages
    • Independent sources: 0
  • Issue: A quotable company summary is missing

    Fix: Publish a company summary in your Organization JSON-LD: a "description" of at least 150 characters and two sentences that names the company, what it does and who or where it serves.

    • Summary source: none
  • Partial: Brand positioning is indistinct

    Fix: State what makes the company different in a way a reader could repeat: a named method, a measurable outcome, a specific focus.

Структура услуг

38

6 checked · 2 passed · 2 issues

  • Отдельная страница для каждой ключевой услуги

    • Reason: No service/business-provider signals detected
    • Core services detected: 0
  • Конкретное название услуги

    • Services detected: 8
    • Specific names: 8
    • Generic names: 0
    • Coverage percent: 100%
  • Partial: The result of the service is unclear

    Fix: For each service, state the concrete outcome: what the client gets after the work is complete.

    • Services evaluated: 8
    • Services with outcome: 1
    • Coverage percent: 13%
  • Issue: Not every service says who it is for

    Fix: Add a \"Who it's for\" block to service pages and list the client types or tasks the offer suits.

    • Services evaluated: 8
    • Services with target audience: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
  • Issue: Not every service says who it is not for

    Fix: For complex or custom services, state limitations, requirements, and cases where the service is not a fit.

    • Applicable services: 8
    • Services with limitations/non-fit: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
  • Partial: Price is not visible for every service

    Fix: For each service, state a price, price range, starting-from cost, or a clear custom-quote condition.

    • Services evaluated: 8
    • Visible price coverage: 1
    • Structured-only coverage: 0
    • Coverage percent: 13%
  • Понятные сроки оказания услуги

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Этапы работы

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Доказательства или кейсы по услуге

    • Reason: No reliable service candidates or service-provider signals detected
    • Services evaluated: 0
  • FAQ по конкретной услуге

    • Services evaluated: 8
    • Services with specific FAQ: 8
    • Coverage percent: 100%

Слой доказательств

55

7 checked · 2 passed · 1 issues

  • Partial: Commercial claims are not backed up

    Fix: Put the evidence next to the claim: a figure, a named client, a date, a certificate, a link to the source. A claim a reader cannot check reads as advertising.

  • Проверка заявлений об опыте

    • Reason: The site makes no claims about its experience
  • Проверка заявлений о количестве клиентов

    • Reason: The site makes no claims about how many clients it has
  • Partial: Claims about results are unsupported

    Fix: Show the numbers behind the result: from what to what, over what period, for whom. A result without a baseline cannot be judged and will not be quoted.

  • Partial: The guarantee is promised but not explained

    Fix: Tie the guarantee statement to distinct conditions: duration, scope, limitations, and the claims process.

    • Source document found: no
    • Structured warranty found: no
    • Explanation signals count: 3
  • Видимость источников отзывов

    • Reason: No visible or structured review/rating signals found
    • Visible reviews found: 0
  • Issue: Case studies carry no facts

    Fix: Write each case as task, approach and result, with numbers. A case that only names the client proves nothing an assistant can repeat.

  • Видимость сертификатов или лицензий

    • Credential claims: yes
    • Visible assets: 31
    • Document links: 2
  • Внешние ссылки на доказательства

    • Proof contexts found: yes
    • External proof links count: 18
  • Partial: Superlatives with nothing behind them

    Fix: Back a superlative with what makes it true — a ranking, an award, a measured figure — or drop it: an unproven "best" costs trust and gives an AI nothing to quote.

Сигналы доверия

2

5 checked · 1 passed · 3 issues

  • Issue: Contact details are insufficient

    Fix: Publish consistent contact details in at least two independent places: your contact page and structured data.

    • Corroborated values count: 4
    • Independent sources count: 3
    • Conflicting values: yes
  • Partial: Legal company information is incomplete

    Fix: Publish the legal company name and key registration details on a dedicated legal/company details page.

    • Legal page URL: none
    • Legal name found: yes
    • Text length: 0
  • Физический адрес или зона оказания услуг

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Видимость экспертов или команды

    • Reason: No service-provider/expert-business signals detected
    • Usable Person count: 0
  • Issue: Authorship is missing in places

    Fix: State the author of your content and add a visible byline, profile link, or Person/author markup.

    • Editorial pages: 1
    • Attributed pages: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0
    • Source types: none
  • Политика конфиденциальности

    • Forms/data collection detected: yes
    • Text length: ≈3190
    • Linked site-wide: yes
  • Условия оказания услуг

    • Reason: No order/payment/booking/contract signals detected
    • Transaction signals: none
  • Issue: No reviews on the site

    Fix: Add visible customer reviews or testimonials, and only mark up reviews that genuinely appear on the page.

    • Visible reviews count: 0
    • Structured Review count: 0
    • AggregateRating found: no
    • Review pages: 0
  • Кейсы

    • Reason: No service-provider/business signals detected
    • Case pages found: 0
  • Актуальность обновления контента

    • Reason: Editorial pages exist but no reliable publish/modified date could be found
    • Editorial pages: 1
    • Pages with reliable date: 0
    • Newest date: unknown
    • Oldest date: unknown
    • Pages older than 730 days: 0
    • Date coverage percent: 0

Schema.org и JSON-LD

0

5 checked · 0 passed · 5 issues

  • Issue: No JSON-LD markup at all

    Fix: Add at least one <script type=\"application/ld+json\"> block describing your organization so AI systems can read structured facts about your business.

    • Pages scanned: 30
    • Pages with JSON-LD: 0
    • JSON-LD blocks found: 0
    • Homepage JSON-LD: no
  • Валидация JSON-LD

    • Reason: No JSON-LD found anywhere on the scanned site — nothing to validate
  • Issue: Organization markup is missing or incomplete

    Fix: Add an Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD block with your company's name, url, logo and contact details so AI systems can identify who is behind this site.

    • Organization type found: none
  • Разметка LocalBusiness

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Issue: No WebSite markup

    Fix: Add a WebSite JSON-LD block (name and url, optionally a SearchAction) so AI systems can identify this as your site's canonical web presence.

    • WebSite type found: none
  • Issue: WebPage markup is missing or incomplete

    Fix: Add a WebPage JSON-LD entity (or a more specific subtype like AboutPage/ContactPage/FAQPage) to your pages so AI systems can understand what each page represents.

    • WebPage type found: none
  • Issue: No BreadcrumbList markup

    Fix: Add BreadcrumbList JSON-LD to your deeper pages (e.g. /services/consulting) so AI systems can understand where each page sits in your site's structure.

    • Deep pages found: 4
    • BreadcrumbList pages found: 0
  • Разметка Service

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Разметка Product / Offer

    • Reason: No product/catalog signals detected on the scanned site
    • Product entities found: 0
    • Offer entities found: 0
  • Разметка FAQPage

    • Reason: No FAQ/Q&A content detected anywhere on the scanned site
    • FAQ blocks found: 0
  • Разметка Person

    • Reason: No author/team signals (team/author-page match, Microdata Person, or author/creator/employee/founder/member property) detected on the scanned site
    • Person type found: none
  • Разметка Review

    • Reason: No review signals (reviews/testimonials page match, or existing Review/AggregateRating/review property) detected on the scanned site
    • Review entities found: 0
  • Разметка AggregateRating

    • Reason: No review signals detected on the scanned site — nothing to aggregate a rating from
    • AggregateRating entities found: 0
  • Ссылки sameAs

    • Reason: No Organization, LocalBusiness, or Person entity found on the scanned site
    • sameAs values found: 0
  • Зона обслуживания (areaServed)

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Почтовый адрес (PostalAddress)

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Соответствие Schema видимому контенту

    • Reason: The site carries no valid JSON-LD to compare with its pages
  • Риск спамной или вводящей в заблуждение разметки

    • Reason: The site carries no valid JSON-LD to compare with its pages

Готовность AI Summary

23

9 checked · 1 passed · 4 issues

  • Partial: Homepage has no AI summary

    Fix: Add a compact company description near the main heading: what it does, who it serves, and what it offers.

    • Character count: 92
    • Sentence count: 1
    • Initial HTML region: yes
    • Identity signal: yes
    • Activity signal: yes
    • Context signal: yes
  • Partial: Service pages have no AI summary

    Fix: Add a short summary under the H1 of each service page: what the service is, its outcome, and who it's for.

    • Service pages evaluated: 8
    • Strong summaries: 1
    • Weak summaries: 5
    • Coverage percent: 13%
  • Issue: The key-facts block is missing or thin

    Fix: Add a compact key-facts block: price, timeline, format, geography, audience, and key terms.

    • Fact block source: none
    • Facts found: 0
    • Fact types: none
    • Heading: none
    • Visible/structured-only: structured-only
  • Issue: "Why choose us" has no proof behind it

    Fix: Tie the \"why choose us\" block to concrete evidence: case studies, reviews, ratings, certificates, or measurable facts.

    • Proof types near: none
    • Proof types site-wide: 2
  • Issue: The «best for» block is missing in places

    Fix: Add a dedicated \"Who it's for\" or \"Best for\" block to the homepage and key offer pages.

    • Key offer pages: 1
    • Pages with best-for block: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
    • Heading: none
  • Issue: The «not for» block is missing in places

    Fix: For complex and custom offers, add a compact block covering limitations and applicability conditions.

    • Applicable offers: 8
    • Pages with not-for block: 0
    • Coverage percent: 0%
    • Heading: none
  • Краткие выжимки кейсов

    • Reason: No substantive case-study pages detected
    • Case pages evaluated: 0
  • Partial: Wording is too abstract

    Fix: Replace vague promises with checkable facts: what exactly you do, on what terms, with what result.

  • Partial: Too much empty filler text

    Fix: Remove sentences that carry no information — an AI answer built from them says nothing about you.

  • Абзацы, которые легко цитировать

    • Quotable paragraphs found: 6

Качество FAQ

0

1 checked · 0 passed · 1 issues

  • Issue: No FAQ on the site

    Fix: Add a question-and-answer block on a dedicated FAQ page or on key service pages.

    • Visible FAQ blocks: 0
  • Покрытие коммерческих вопросов

    • Reason: No visible FAQ content found
    • Commercial topic groups found: 0
  • Покрытие возражений

    • Reason: No visible FAQ content found
    • Objection topic groups found: 0
  • Покрытие локальных вопросов

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Покрытие сравнительных вопросов

    • Reason: No visible FAQ content found
    • Comparison question found: no
  • Вопросы выбора подрядчика или поставщика

    • Reason: No visible FAQ content found
    • Vendor-selection topic groups found: 0
  • Конкретность ответов

    • Reason: AI evaluation was unavailable for this run
  • Разметка FAQPage

    • Reason: No visible FAQ content found
    • Pages with visible FAQ: 0
  • Естественные формулировки вопросов

    • Reason: AI evaluation was unavailable for this run
  • Согласованность со страницами услуг

    • Reason: No visible FAQ content found
    • Services detected: 0

Готовность к AI-ответам

61

9 checked · 6 passed · 2 issues

  • Контент под рекомендательные запросы

  • Issue: "Best provider for…" questions are not covered

    Fix: Answer how to choose a provider for this task — selection criteria, comparisons, and where you fit among the alternatives.

  • Issue: Problem-driven questions are not covered

    Fix: Describe the problem the customer starts from, in their own words — not only the service you sell.

  • Покрытие локальных запросов

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Partial: There is almost no comparison of options

    Fix: Add a dedicated comparison of the options covering price, composition, outcome, limitations, and selection guidance.

    • Comparable group type: yes
    • Candidates: 6
    • Dimensions found: 1
    • Strong/weak: weak
  • Страницы для этапа выбора

    • Offers evaluated: 8
    • Decision-stage pages: 8
    • Coverage percent: 100%
  • Понятные отличия от конкурентов

  • Честные ограничения

  • Понятный следующий шаг

    • Answer-oriented pages: 8
    • Pages with specific next step: 8
    • Coverage percent: 100%
  • Не шаблонный контент

Внешняя согласованность

30

1 checked · 0 passed · 0 issues

  • Видимость Google Business Profile

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Согласованность названия бренда

  • Согласованность адреса

    • Reason: Does not apply to this type of site, per the detected site profile
  • Согласованность телефона

  • Согласованность описания услуг

  • Видимость внешних отзывов

  • Внешние ссылки и цитирования

  • Partial: Too few links to official profiles

    Fix: Add links to the company's official profiles on the site and duplicate them in sameAs.

    • Visible official profiles: 2
    • Structured profiles: 0
    • Overlapping profiles: 0
  • Упоминания бренда

  • Риск противоречий

Коммерческое доверие

25

10 checked · 6 passed · 1 issues

  • Issue: The first screen does not say what is on offer

    Fix: Place the name or a clear heading, a specific offer, and the main target action near the start of the homepage.

    • Identity found: no
    • Offer found: yes
    • Primary action found: no
    • H1: none
    • CTA label: none
    • Method: initial HTML source region
  • Partial: The call to action is hard to find

    Fix: Add a specific action button near the start of the page: order, book, get a quote, or get started.

    • Primary CTA count: 39
    • Generic CTA count: 23
    • Initial-region CTA: none
    • Label: none
    • Target: none
  • Наличие формы заявки

    • Service-provider signal: no
    • Quote/contact CTA: no
    • Lead form found: yes
    • Contact page or channel: yes
  • Видимость цены или условий

    • Reason: No offering/commercial signals detected
    • Visible price/condition count: 0
  • Объяснение гарантий

    • Explanation signals count: 3
    • Structured warranty: no
  • Доказательства рядом с CTA

    • Structurally near: yes
    • Proximity reason: same heading, same form, or nearby DOM position
  • Быстрый способ связи

    • Reason: No provider/contact-oriented signals detected
    • Fast contact types: n/a
  • Юридические страницы

    • Data collection: yes
    • Transaction: no
    • Terms page/link: none
    • Linked near flow: yes
  • Мобильная готовность к конверсии

    • Viewport adapts to the device: The page declares itself usable on a phone
  • Partial: Too much distracts from the action

    Fix: Leave one obvious next step on the page. Several different actions asking for the same attention means none of them is the next step.

  • Блоки доверия рядом с точками конверсии

  • Partial: The next step is not obvious

    Fix: Use specific actions such as \"Get a quote\", \"Book now\", \"Order\", or \"Start a check\" instead of a vague \"Learn more\".

    • Key offer pages: 0
    • Pages with specific CTA: 0
    • Initial specific CTA: no
    • Generic CTA count: 23
    • Label: none

Want to know which of these problems your own site has? Run an AIRA check.

Similar examples

GEO Audit Example: property developer site, minimal groundwork | AIRA